User talk:Isarra/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Isarra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Thanks
Thanks for answering my questions regarding your candidacy for ArbCom. Thanking you here to avoid clutter at that page. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for bearing with me as I attempt to sort out where I stand on all of this. I am supposed to stand on it, right? Not sit, or take a nap, or... ah, whatever. -— Isarra ༆ 18:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Isarra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
De la bonne humeur, merci Isarra!
Gilles 11:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Cheers. -— Isarra ༆ 05:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Actually, I don't know why I hit you with this trout. Trout in pie would be disgusting and they would work terribly as baseballs. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Is this because I threatened to misuse my, ehrm, rights? Because I totally promise I will absolutely abide by all project, er, policies. Really. In practice. Yes. -— Isarra ༆ 05:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Very very important question.
I don't know if you remember me. It's been a while. But I have to ask about your palm tree. Do you still have your moldy palm tree in your basement?
That is all.
Frood 05:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm afraid it died. It has since been replaced by a much smaller palm tree of a totally different type that serves as a drainage system for a fern with hairy spider feet hanging off a light fixture. -— Isarra ༆ 20:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Oh no. I'm sorry to hear that. Is the new one moldy? Frood 22:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Nope. -— Isarra ༆ 23:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Please do not protect articles
Hi Isarra,
Because we have discussed this issue off-wiki via IRC and because the result of the discussion was unsatisfactory to me, I would like to add this message to document my disapproval on-wiki.
Please do not protect, or threaten to protect, articles in the main namespace (or talk pages and similar non-technical spaces). As a global interface editor, you do have access to the “protect” privilege, probably to allow you to edit cascade protected templates or do other work related to your interface editing duties. I would like to remind you that this privilege must “only be used for non-controversial maintenance, or by request of the local community.”
You are not a steward, and even if you were one, “(i)f there are any doubts as to whether or not an action should be performed, stewards should not act unless it is an emergency situation requiring immediate action or there are no active local users to do it.”
Meta also has a process called “Limited adminship”, which may be of the same nature as your global interface editor group. The meta page about administrators says: “Limited administrators should avoid using their administrator tools for tasks they have not been authorized, and doing so will be grounds for immediate removal.”
While the English Wikipedia’s Global rights policy says “Global interface editors can use their rights by default, provided they have not previously had the administrator or interface administrator right removed at the English Wikipedia.”, I believe this section to be about your interface editing duties, not about evading community consensus by doing administrative actions in the main namespace without a successful Request for adminship. Please also note that the local interface adminship, per a recent RfC, is strictly limited to local administrators.
I believe that using your global “Interface editor” privilege to do administrative actions in the main namespace is inherently controversial, as acknowledged by you in our discussion by referring to the threatened action as “drama”. I urge you to avoid doing so, and I would likely report the incident both locally and globally if you choose to test the limits.
Thank you very much for your understanding. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Additional note: To discuss the general issue in an editor-neutral, general way, you may like to join the discussion at WT:Global rights policy. Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed, 100%. Isarra's mention of unprotecting the main page on IRC is a clear violation of WP:SRSBSNS. Legoktm (talk) 08:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: To be clear, I was joking. I had thought at the time this should be apparent from the various other ridiculous and moderately evil remarks I was making, but perhaps not. I trust this confusion has now been emended by outright stating it here. -— Isarra ༆ 08:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Isarra, thank you very much for the clarification. While I did understand that the "main page unprotection" has never been seriously considered, you did raise an interesting policy issue and a believable threat when implying that you would single-handedly protect a specific BLP if an administrator does not do so quickly enough. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
...what? How did I miss this gem before?! Killiondude (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- I guess you're not that good of a stalker. -— Isarra ༆ 20:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
An Outrage
I just wanted to say how sorry and disappointed I was that you were not elected to ARBCOM after such a stunning campaign - it really makes you wonder about the misguided priorities of the electorate.
Nosebagbear (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- I think it was Isarra's stance on pie that did her in. --Izno (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oops. -— Isarra ༆ 02:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
re wikiproject x
Hi Isarra 
Just saw wikiproject x linked from an old issue of tech news. Are you still working on this? How do I test the latest version of this extension? Where does collaboration on coding take place? Do you need any translations of translatable strings to another language? I can translate to Russian.
--Gryllida (talk) 00:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Gryllida: Hey, I am still working on it, yes! If you want updates, I highly recommend signing up for the newsletter. They've a bit sporadic lately since I keep injuring myself, but work is ongoing. The extension is CollaborationKit, so you can download and test it on your own wiki or try it live on testwiki, or check gerrit, phab, and twn to see/contribute to all their respective aspects of development. -— Isarra ༆ 20:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Isarra. I've signed up to the newsletter.
- What about adding sister projects to the wikiproject X thing, Isarra? When making a new WikiProject, if the extension is installed at sister wikis or in other languages, it possibly should provide an opportunity to link to the relevant projects there. In my opinion this would balance things out as the {{sisterprojects}} are a part of the Wikimedia movement and if people know about them, they have an opportunity to publish their content under a free licence instead of not publishing it or publishing it under a inadequate licence on their personal blog.
- I would be glad if this information was shown on the page and not just in the sidebar which people rarely read.
- It could also be interesting to integrate a translator dashboard function so that at any given WikiProject, if the user speaks two languages and the extension knows this somehow, then it can offer them to translate articles from within this WikiProject to the relevant WikiProject at another language-wiki, where the page is missing.
- --Gryllida (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Filed as phab:T212328. -— Isarra ༆ 18:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Isarra. I've signed up to the newsletter.
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Congrats for nearly reaching a 40% support ratio on your ArbCom election. Sadly, it wasn't 1-to-3, like you wanted. Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 22:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC) |
- The people love me, what can I say? -— Isarra ༆ 18:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13
This month: A general update.
The current status of the project is as follows:
- Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
- I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
- If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
- Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.
Until next time,
-— Isarra ༆ 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear about your recent concussion, but glad to hear that it appears you have recovered from it. Happy holidays, North America1000 09:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, man. -— Isarra ༆ 22:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 at Women in Red
|
 January events:
|
Mobile responsive view question
Maybe I'm overlooking it, but I can't seem to find how to get back to the article from the talk page. If there's a more appropriate place for me to pose this question, let me know. Thank you, –xenotalk 18:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Xeno: Which skin are you using? Minerva, MonoBook, or Timeless? And are you on the mobile site (the en.m. prefix in the url) or desktop? -— Isarra ༆ 19:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Monobook. Not the mobile site, but the desktop site when in portrait viewing on a plus-size mobile device. –xenotalk 19:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Xeno: Ahah, it looks like the problem is that it is... broken. Probably a js issue, not properly checking the namespace, or something, and removing the tab that should be appearing. I'll file a bug/see if I can fix it. -— Isarra ༆ 19:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Much obliged! –xenotalk 19:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Any progress? It's a bit bothersome to have to rotate the screen when getting stuck on a talk page. –xenotalk 14:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Heh, you're right to nag. This is something I'd only get to fairly randomly as a volunteer, so that helps ensure it actually gets, you know, got to. Not bad timing, either - I'll see if I can fix it now. -— Isarra ༆ 16:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Xeno: All right, submitted a patch. That was roundabout and annoying, perhaps rather like having to deal with the issue itself. -— Isarra ༆ 17:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks again! It was one of my gripes about the mobile responsive view. But it was a bug all along! –xenotalk 00:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Xeno: All right, submitted a patch. That was roundabout and annoying, perhaps rather like having to deal with the issue itself. -— Isarra ༆ 17:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Heh, you're right to nag. This is something I'd only get to fairly randomly as a volunteer, so that helps ensure it actually gets, you know, got to. Not bad timing, either - I'll see if I can fix it now. -— Isarra ༆ 16:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Xeno: Ahah, it looks like the problem is that it is... broken. Probably a js issue, not properly checking the namespace, or something, and removing the tab that should be appearing. I'll file a bug/see if I can fix it. -— Isarra ༆ 19:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Monobook. Not the mobile site, but the desktop site when in portrait viewing on a plus-size mobile device. –xenotalk 19:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Women Writers
How does the "Women writers articles by quality and importance" table at WikiProject Women Writers get updated? It seems to be stuck on 32,595 articles for quite some time. The JL-Bot appears to only update recognized content, e.g. # of Featured Articles, etc. If I should be asking someone else (some bot operator), please let me know. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: Looks like it's done by JL-Bot, so if it's not updating properly, I'd say the operator, JLaTondre, would be the most likely one to be able to debug it. -— Isarra ༆ 18:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, wait, you already figured that. Hmm... -— Isarra ༆ 18:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: Okay, yeah, I dunno. It could be that the bot could/should also be doing that, but whatever the case, JLaTondre would probably at least have some idea how/where to follow up, if it's not in scope of what that bot should reasonably doing. -— Isarra ༆ 18:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll wait to hear back from JLaTondre. Thanks, Isarra. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, wait, you already figured that. Hmm... -— Isarra ༆ 18:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
|
 February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
|
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
Editing problems on Women in Red
Hi Isarra. I've just noticed it is no longer possible to edit the Press and Research sections on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/About us. Are you able to sort this out or should I seek assistance elsewhere?--Ipigott (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Ipigott: The issue was likely that they are both transcluded subpages, so you would have need to follow the {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Press}} to the actual page Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Press, and other one to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Research and edit those. For future reference, you should be able to paste the content of the {{}} into your search to get around this when you run into it. But I've also moved the headers to the subpages, so the editsection links should now just take you straight to the correct page if you use those. -— Isarra ༆ 16:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick work. Should now be easier for everyone.--Ipigott (talk) 16:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
April editathons at Women in Red
April 2019
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
General note
I seem to have completely overwhelmed myself between the two projects and travel and more side projects and as a result my brain appears to have shut down. I will get back to everything as soon as I can, but I don't know when that will be. I apologise for any inconvenience this causes. -— Isarra ༆ 03:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
WP:X WikiProject Modules
Hi Isarra! I'm using {{Load WikiProject Modules}} to format up a test combined WP:WikiProject Genetic, Molecular and Cellular Biology (see discussion) and it brought up a few ideas for tweaks to improve it:
- Can the menu icons be wrapped under the intro text, rather than under the image? I think it would look tidier.
- Is there any way to add a compressed version of #Discussions to the wikiproject's talkpage, or vice versa?
- Could Article alerts be added to the #Discussions section?
Overall though, the modules system is very good. Sadly I can't speak LUA, otherwise I'd love to help out in it (also posted at User talk:Harej for record). T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 13:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Evolution and evolvability: For the first one, yeah, you're not wrong - that would look better. Not entirely sure how to do it, though, with the whole top thing in a block (image, into, members all in the same div), and then the ToC in another block/div after... you could try editing the source of the module itself (the html/wikitext output, never even mind the lua itself), though, to make it a bit more flexible so you can set some floats in there? I'm not sure how much the whole thing is being used by other projects.
- Anything in a subpage can be included anywhere else, just do it all template-style and you should be able to get something along those lines, but if you want it to be smart you might need some bots involved... not sure. And... yeah, I don't really know lua either, so... I dunno. -— Isarra ༆ 20:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
WP:WPX--How is it coming along?
@Isarra:I just read through the newsletters for WPX and it seems like the entire thing has been placed in your lap and you are otherwise busy. I totally empathize and I don't mean to pry, but may I ask if there is an update newsletter in the pipeline? It has been some months.
I have an interest in revamping WP:BIOL and/or some of its daughter projects, and I'd like to do it somewhat snappy-like. I'd like to know more about the most recent state of affairs before I head down that road, though. Anyway, I'm just trying to follow through and check on things. If you need any help and/or if you'd rather continue this conversation on the WPX talk page, let me know. Prometheus720 (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Prometheus720: Sorry about that; I kind of gave up on writing the newsletters for a bit and just focused on the development side of it since that's really more my thing anyway. I kept getting in this ridiculous cycle where it would take me so long to write the newsletter that then I wouldn't have any time left to do anything, and then I'd have nothing to put in the next newsletter and take even longer to write that... it turns out I'm kind of bad at this stuff and there was a reason James was doing that part of the project before.
- Anyway, last week I sent in the midpoint report, if you want the really long version of where things stand. Travel around the hackathon in Prague over the weekend got a little weird, so I didn't get a chance to follow up with a newsletter version of that, but basically the extension is almost ready for testing and it's about time to start discussing if folks here would be willing to, well, actually have it deployed onwiki.
- What do you think about deploying CollaborationKit here for testing? Would you be willing to help start that discussion? -— Isarra ༆ 09:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, no problem! I understand. I don't have the deepest of technical backgrounds but I understand a little bit of coding. I regularly read progress reports from my favorite emulators and software devs and I generally get the gist of what's going on. I have done a tiny bit of work with HTML, CSS, and JS before, too. If you'd be interested in showing me the ropes (or even showing me where I could show myself the ropes), I'd be willing to help write those newsletters.
- As for "deploying CollaborationKit here," are you referring to WP:BIOL? I actually just sent out feelers today on the talk page. I'm basically deadset on a revamp of the page, and I heavily suggested we use some of the things that you all have developed. I like everything. I like the reports and requests and the layout and the members system. I say hell yes, and that is so far the only time I have sworn on Wikipedia so I hope you know I mean it! I really am sad about how Wikiprojects just die. We need to raise engagement significantly. So it isn't just up to me, especially as I am rather new. I personally would like to do it but I'm going to have to update you about how this goes. So far Evo and Evo is into it, which is good because he is one of the most active users in that project. I have seen a little support so far (but also nothing BUT support). It looks like they are also supporting merging some of the daughter projects so we are going to have a lot to talk about. Let's wait a few days and I'll send you an update. Thanks for the quick reply! I'll read over that link you sent me today. Have a good one! And hey, let me know if you want help on those newsletters!Prometheus720 (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Isarra and Evolution and evolvability: I was just attempting to put some old requests on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Biology/Assessment page into the requests system and I'm getting this page. Is there something wrong on my end? I was trying to make some proof-of-concept subpages to start getting the WPX stuff up-and-running but this is a serious issue. I'd appreciate some help here.
- Tom, I'm just pinging you to keep you posted on what I'm up to. I think I could finish setting up a requests page today for WP:BIOL if we can just get this solved. We still need to redo the front page to link to it, but we can cross that bridge once we have something to link to. Prometheus720 (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Prometheus720: Crap, I have no idea - I just do onwiki stuff and MediaWiki development - tools and bots and stuff are just completely outside my skills/knowledge. You might still try asking harej about the requests stuff specifically, though - he's not actively working on it anymore, but he might have a quick idea how to fix it, or some idea of someone else you might be able to ask to look into it if he doesn't have time. If that doesn't work I might be able to follow up by just asking random other people, though, so let me know... -— Isarra ༆ 07:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Isarra: So as it turns out, I started working on a little draft page for requests. And lo and behold, all of the requests did process. I actually had multiple copies of the same request under Wikiproject:Biology because I kept trying to process it. But the page itself kept telling me I had a 404 and all that. So...it works, but it doesn't LOOK like it works. I'll go talk to Harej about it though--this looks like something that needs to be fixed eventually anyway. Maintainers, my friend. It's not the innovators that run this world, but the damn maintainers. And when you can't find one, panic! Prometheus720 (talk) 07:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Prometheus720: Well, that's something, at least! Yeah. Or you badger get someone else to take over. Good luck! -— Isarra ༆ 08:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Isarra: So as it turns out, I started working on a little draft page for requests. And lo and behold, all of the requests did process. I actually had multiple copies of the same request under Wikiproject:Biology because I kept trying to process it. But the page itself kept telling me I had a 404 and all that. So...it works, but it doesn't LOOK like it works. I'll go talk to Harej about it though--this looks like something that needs to be fixed eventually anyway. Maintainers, my friend. It's not the innovators that run this world, but the damn maintainers. And when you can't find one, panic! Prometheus720 (talk) 07:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Prometheus720: Crap, I have no idea - I just do onwiki stuff and MediaWiki development - tools and bots and stuff are just completely outside my skills/knowledge. You might still try asking harej about the requests stuff specifically, though - he's not actively working on it anymore, but he might have a quick idea how to fix it, or some idea of someone else you might be able to ask to look into it if he doesn't have time. If that doesn't work I might be able to follow up by just asking random other people, though, so let me know... -— Isarra ༆ 07:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
@Isarra and Prometheus720: I've been working on wp:wikiproject GMCB (a merger of several existing, overlapping wikiprojects), similar to Prometheus720's work on the multicellular side of biology. I had a go at trying to edit the Module:Load_WikiProject_Modules to make the header and lead image layout more like WP:WPWIR, but didn't manage to get anywhere. I don't quite understand lua enough to get the css to behave as I expect it (i.e. putting the heading inf, image, toc image strip, and member list inside a flexbox). Any ideas? I'm happy to help out test the CollaborationKit over at wp:wikiproject GMCB. @Prometheus720:, I think it would be fine to be bold and overhaul the wp:BIO main page with the new formatting! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 06:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Evolution and evolvability and Prometheus720: Ideas? Not really - the way css and whatnot works onwiki here is a bit arcane even to me. I do like what you guys have done with it, though, and if you do run into any specific new problems now I might be able to take a look. -— Isarra ༆ 19:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Sister projects linking
Hi Isarra. :-) Have you got a chance to experiment with exposing sister projects in this tool? I think we discussed it previously and you were interested in discussing the design and purpose but we didn't get around to that point. --Gryllida (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Gryllida: Alas, no; I'm still working on some really stupid things like making sure if users have their interface language set to something else it doesn't break the content. Once the basics are sorted out we can move onto the, well, properly useful stuff. Development is fun like that. >.> -— Isarra ༆ 19:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I wish you good luck with your development. Gryllida (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Gryllida: Soon, SOON I will actually solve this stupid crap. I hope. (And, seriously, thanks, man.) -— Isarra ༆ 17:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I wish you good luck with your development. Gryllida (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 14
Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.
There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:
- A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
- We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!
Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:
- Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
- WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)
Until next time,
July events from Women in Red!
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Cross wiki prod
Your face. 63.227.47.180 (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
Since it seems I can't "publicly thank" you for the work discussed here using the "thank" button, I thought I'd just pass on my appreciation for your work on this here on your talk page. Way to go. Risker (talk) 01:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Risker: Thanks! MonoBook forever! -— Isarra ༆ 02:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Can you speak Bod or is it just stylistic?
Can you? TryKid (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- @TryKid: Just stylistic, I'm afraid. One of the markers amused me, so I decided to keep it forever. Not sure where the rest of it came from, but it is such a pretty script. -— Isarra ༆ 22:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Updating problem
Hi there, Isarra. Can you fix the Research section on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/About_us. I am no longer able to edit it.--Ipigott (talk) 09:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing it so quickly.--Ipigott (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Ipigott: You're very welcome! -— Isarra ༆ 20:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15
A final update, for now:
The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.
Regards,
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom
Besides you, who else should I vote for and against? Thanks. Benjamin (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Would I really recommend me? Would I?
- Whatever the case, there's some pretty fancy statements and responses up, and plenty of folks also seem to have some pretty solid track records even aside from their nominations, if you want to sort out who they are. There are some others I might really wonder why they're there, given... sentiment, but maybe they're just doing what I'm doing, I dunno. -— Isarra ༆ 23:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- I thought you might not answer, but I had to ask. Thanks anyway. Benjamin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry, I don't really follow things well enough to properly substantiate the particularly 'yikes' impressions, but others have done a pretty good job of explaining the actual issues, anyway. And I don't really want to bring anyone who I actually would recommend down by association, either. Like there's this one user who if I were taking this seriously, I would very much like to think my statement and responses and stuff would look like theirs... -— Isarra ༆ 02:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- I thought you might not answer, but I had to ask. Thanks anyway. Benjamin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
|
Belated holiday greetings
↠Pine (✉) 16:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Project
Hi Isarra Could you contact me about a project? Mdougla (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdougla: Could you please be less vague? -— Isarra ༆ 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Yes! contact me at: <redacted> Mdougla (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdougla: Is it a secret project? -— Isarra ༆ 02:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hired someone, thanks! Mdougla (talk)
- @Mdougla: Did your email intrigue them? It probably helps if they have the appropriate access to a Giant Gummy Lizard. -— Isarra ༆ 16:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Responsive Monobook
Hi Isarra, I heard you may know a bunch about responsive monobook? I mentioned you at Talk:Main_Page#Non-Mobile_minerva_and_responsive_monobook_issues, where you may be able to lend some insight if you have a moment. Also, do you know if there a main skin page on mw: that documents responsive monobook? — xaosflux Talk 00:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I agree with whatever Jon says. (But seriously, thanks for the heads up.)
- If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— Isarra ༆ 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Isarra: I don't see anything at mw:Skin:MonoBook. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Yeah, I don't know. Don't know that anyone would. At that point I'd probably just recommend taking a private tab, ?useskin=monobook, and resizing it to test and make sure it seems reasonable to you, like any of the others; if it tiles properly in minerva or timeless it'll probably be fine there too regardless. Content itself should be a full-width block in all of them; beyond that if it works in desktop it shouldn't be much different in mobile. Thanks! -— Isarra ༆ 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Isarra: I don't see anything at mw:Skin:MonoBook. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red
|
  Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging