Ion Zone

I tend to just write stubs as I have trouble understanding markup.

Ion Zone (talk) 14:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Revising "Religious Violence" Page

Hey Ion Zone,

Just wanted to encourage you to "clean up" whatever you think is necessary on Religious violence. I can help you a little bit if you want.

I already corrected two sections where I though that people were just being incredibly sloppy. The one I mentioned earlier and the "Conflicts and Wars" section. I balanced those out a few months ago.

There is lots of work to be done. There are a few things that can be removed such as Sam Harris comments on "Christianity" sections. He is NOT a good source for speaking on religion in violence sine his work is a polemic, not an academic or scholarly research book. He is not an expert on this issue.

You can edit it as much as you want.

Ramos1990 (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Ramos, I'll help however I can but I am a bit tied up at the moment with a project that is due next week. I'll have a quick look over the article now and come back to it more fully when I have time.

Ion Zone (talk) 21:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey Ion Zone, I made a few edits on the criticism of religion page today. I reduced much redundancy in the list of criticisms and made it more neutral. I also added a detail on Lucretius's views. What kind of things are you trying to add? I noticed you were reverted a few times. Have you posted your thoughts on the talk page? I think if you have solid points editors can reach a consensus there. Tell me what you need and I'll see what I can do to support you. Ramos1990 (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey Ion Zone,

Long time no see. I thought you may be interested in a new article that is quite controversial. Unscientific claims in religious scriptures. Some are considering deleting it and others keeping it. Want to provide your thoughts on it?--Ramos1990 (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)