This is the place to send messages to huwr:

64 bit MMU on the G5

edit

"a" huwr this is a about 64 or 42 bit mmu g5.... to have mmu 64+ and unneeded complexity to the design.... just imagin the processor having to internal move all memory on 64-bit data paths.... that may not be used in the life time of the processor. even cern supercollider doesnt create that much data.....so 42-bit it is ......thanks ....later oh..before if foreget PowerPC fore ever..sorry4this edit dont knowHowTosendMEssages...UPDATE.....just did a double-check..seen you wanted references did some research..were both right....ok here is 42-bit physical(real) address, 65-bit virtual address ...look at MMU ref=[1]


Canberra pronunciation

edit

Howdy. Welcome to Wikipedia. Edit Boldly. (p.s.: someday you might want to check WikiTravel:Canberra for accuracy). -- DavidCary 20:54, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Cheers, David. I have already read the newcomer's page, by the way. About the Canberra editing mistake, I realised I'd mucked up pretty soon after they changed my edit back, so I apologise for that, but thanks anyway. See ya round. --huwr 11:32, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

RAID diagrams

edit

OK, I like that RAID edit - I wasn't sure how to put it exactly, and that works for me. A1 A2 didn't, but A1 A1 looks good. --Sfoskett 11:21, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)


As a major contributor to the Ambrosia Software page, you may want to vote on a misguided effort to vote to delete the Andrew Welch entry as "vanity" and claims that only Maelstrom is known and even that's insignificant, etc. etc. DreamGuy 17:39, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

The reason I changed the link to read X Windows was for disambiguation for users that are only familiar with X.Org since it doesn't specifically mention anything about X11; but now thinking about what you said about X windows being similar to Microsoft Windows and reading your reference, that totally makes sense to me. Thanks for correcting it and clearing that up. -- Striker 04:50, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

User Friendly

edit

Thank you for taking an interest in this entry.

I have reverted your edit to the previous version. I feel that the contents is clearer in the manual form, and like the fact we can link directly to each regular character. I accept that more changes are necessary, and some of the changes you made (particuarly the changes in relation to menu levels) may be reincorporated.

I trust we can amicably resolve any issues which may arise. Epideme 23:47, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi Huwr, you put a delete tag on this image, but its currently used on House Anaticula. The image won't be deleted while in used. Once the image is an orphan (not used anywhere) then your request (as the uploader) can be completed.

Also, make sure you list on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion after adding a delete tag to an image, or it might not get taken care of. --Duk 03:53, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Apostrophe police

edit

Hooray for the apostrophe police! It's about time we had some law and order here! Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 00:42, 10 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

G'day Huwr

edit

Blog

edit

G'day Huwr,

I havn't used Wikipedia much, but it is certainly cool. You could be on the other side of the world, but your not:

It's a small world after all It's a small world after all It's a small world after all It's a small, small world

There is just one moon - And one golden sun And a smile means - Friendship to every one Though the mountains divide - And the oceans are wide It's a small world after all

It's a small world after all It's a small world after all It's a small world after all It's a small, small world

Oh and P.s. sorry for screwing around with your page, I should have read the instrutions at the top. So what can this Wikipedia thing do anyway?

User Categorization

edit

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Australia page as living in or being associated with the Australian Capital Territories. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in ACT for instructions. Rmky87 22:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

iMac article

edit

Hi there, nice to have that pic at the top of the article now. I'd like to put this up for featured-article status in the next month or two. Are you able to help? Tony 08:34, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I didn't move any pictures, but I did reorder some text and remove some text. I would like to see the article gain feature-article status. What do I do to help? --huwr 08:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I guess I'm a vandal now!

edit

Wow! Thanks for correcting that!

I see what happened now, I normally look all the diffs by anon users for pages on my watch list when I am logged in. In this case, the anon user was being nice and reverting some old vandalism (how often does that happen!). I just looked the diff, and saw vandalism, and reverted change without paying enough attention to the side of the page the diff was on.

Ooops, I feel dumb. Thanks again for catching it. - Trysha (talk) 05:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Canberra School Articles

edit

Hi, please do not revert redirects from school names to suburb articles. See discussion at Talk:List of schools in the Australian Capital Territory for reasoning. Most schools are not going to be notable enough to deserve their own article and therefore any information about them can be included under the relavent suburb article. --Martyman-(talk) 07:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Myna

edit

Mynas are well known as the most competent of all speaking birds (and it wasn't my edit) - it's like saying you need a source for parrots are colourful - I've reverted. jimfbleak 07:00, 6 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Waterfall model

edit

Hey, I've added some stuff to Waterfall model to try and explain the reasoning behind the model, what it actually is and to clarify its faults for those who haven't heard this stuff before. Can you please review my changes? I'd really appreciate it, thanks.

Nice to see a fellow (future) ANU student too.

GeorgeBills 04:49, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

lowercase

edit

Hi! Just wanted to let you know that {{lowercase}} would probably work better for you than {{wrongtitle}}. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hullo

edit
 
A robot with teeth. It may or may not bite..

Randomly wandered onto your userpage, and can't even remember quite what got me here. Anyway, I've done my wandering around now, found your interesting userpage, (which I apparently had visited some nine months ago, leaving a message..) and left you a robot with teeth in return. --Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 04:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism?

edit

Eh? Thanks for the catch, but what exactly did the vandalism consist of? I confess I missed it. :) Guapovia 11:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

You misspelled Greek god of war, you. :p Guapovia 17:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

iMac iSight

edit

The link doesn't say anywhere about an upgraded iSight in the new Intel iMac.

Hornblower Omnibusses

edit

Hey, thanks for fixing that up. I should have checked the actual composition of them, but my copies are in a box somewhere at the moment.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Am spotlight.png)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Am spotlight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Ambrosia logo.gif

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ambrosia logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

invite

edit

Graeme Bartlett 03:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ambrosia logo.gif)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Ambrosia logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Battle2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Battle2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invite to Canberra Meetup #2

edit
--.../Nemo (talkContributions) 16:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

{{subst:di-no spermission-notice|1=X-Chat Aqua screenshot.png}} –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010

edit
 

I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:

RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Invite

edit

You may be interested to come to the Wikipedia celebration on 15 January in Canberra. see http://ten.wiki.x.io/wiki/Canberra . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're invited to the Canberra WikiMeetup on 20 November 2011

edit

Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Canberra meetup invitation: January 2013

edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Canberra meetup invitation: February 2013

edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Canberra meetup invitation

edit

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 01:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Canberra meetup invitation (August 2016)

edit

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Huwr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Huwr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Huwr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:AdaRowlands.jpg needs authorship information

edit
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:AdaRowlands.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

  1. The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
  2. Where and how this particular version was obtained.
  3. When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Huwr}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.


If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Huwr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply