Speedy deletion nomination of Oakwood Law Group, llp

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Oakwood Law Group, llp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Goodvac (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2010

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Oakwood Law Group, llp. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakwood Law Group, llp

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Oakwood Law Group, llp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk | ☮✌☮ 03:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakwood Law Group, llp

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Oakwood Law Group, llp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk | ☮✌☮ 03:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakwood Law Group, llp

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Oakwood Law Group, llp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 06:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Oakwood Law Group, llp, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. —C.Fred (talk) 06:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • The problem was there were no secondary sources cited in the article that mentioned the subject at all. The word "Oakwood" did not appear in the news story or the press release. Accordingly, the article clearly met criterion A7 and was speedy deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 06:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

40 Wall Street tenant

edit

Nice to see someone trying but, eh? A law firm is notable because they put their office in a famous downtown skyscraper? Better to step back for a broader view. Even the building article doesn't have a tenant list, just as most building articles don't have one, and if it did, would you say that all the tenants on such a list, or every office space tenant on Wall Street, or every one below Chambers Street, is encyclopedically notable for that reason alone? Do you see a reason to make Wikipedia that big?

Not that there's any reason to get discouraged and feel that your efforts must go unappreciated. Most of the work of Wikipedia isn't making new articles; it's improving old ones. When an old article becomes large with good material, the time may come to split off a well organized part and create a new one. It's just that, when there isn't yet much reason to discuss a topic in old articles, there's seldom a need to make a new article about it. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Somehow, I feel that each building serves as a community unto itself by the tenants that reside there. Over the years, as one walks the halls of these great buildings much of the history is lost without making note of the tenants and if they did something that contributes to the history of the building. It's kinda like walking back through the halls of high school. Near the gym there's a trophy case and that calls out who was notable in the school in years gone by... They may not mean much in the pro sports world but probably hold a bit of meaning for whomever is standing in front of the trophy case itself. I would like to see the same experience for someone who reads about a building here on wikipedia. The building almost comes alive with stories of tenants and there notable contributions over the history of the building itself.... BTW, I remember Swensons ice cream way back in the day in the americana shopping center...Hotsummer 9 (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject

edit
 

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books, often referred to as "novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the coordinators or an experienced member of the project; we will be happy to assist in any way we can. Again, welcome, and we look forward to seeing you around! —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Conflicts of interest

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article 40 Wall Street, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Oakwood Law Group

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Oakwood Law Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

New WikiProject Novels initiative

edit

We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February

edit

Thank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members