Hopeful2014

Welcome!

Hello, Hopeful2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic London 16:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hackney Wick

Hackney Wick station is in Hackney Wick and not Hackney. I hope you haven't generalised other stations. 2A01:4C8:2D:D912:1:1:438A:8E4A (talk) 12:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Hopeful2014, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Hopeful2014! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hainault tube station without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 23:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Newbury Park tube station, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Barkingside tube station, you may be blocked from editing. If you have a reason for removing the tables and putting a line of text, please state it here or in the edit summary. 331dot (talk) 23:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Warwick Avenue tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Westbourne Park and Little Venice

Beckton DLR station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Greenway

Cambridge Heath railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victoria Park

Mile End tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victoria Park

Romford railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to LSP

West Ham station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victoria Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Tone

I re-wrote one of your additions to London Chest Hospital. Please see WP:TONE about the appropriate way to write in Wikipedia. Thanks! – Fayenatic London 16:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Victoria Park, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Stratford, Enfield, Liverpool Street and The Greenway

East London Transit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rainham

London Buses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IBus

Mile End Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Victoria Park

Romford railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stratford

Transport in London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to West London

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Happy Attack Dog (Bark! Bark!) 12:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tlesher. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on List of people from Tower Hamlets, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tlesher (talk) 13:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Inappropriate capitals

We don't scatter capital letters at random around an article. Please read the Manual of Style, and in particular WP:MOSCAPS. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bow and Stratford

Alperton tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to West London

National Cycle Route 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lincoln

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Generalisations

Please keep articles specific. Atopical generalisations stating that roads can be used by buses, cars, cycles, skaters and/or horseriders are not appropriate to encyclopedic articles. 19:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Walkers

Hi. I think it's fine to add connections to long-distance paths but I don't see why we need to say they are "for walkers" when you have already given it a "walkers" subheader AND said that it is a "long-distance footpath". The next bit feels like overkill. I hope you can agree and stop adding this. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

No, we should not pad out our articles on London stations with mentions of every long-distance path that might pass near them. Wikipedia is not a travel guide, but even if it was, the reader wishing to use a long-distance path would not seek through each station article to find one that connected to the path. These rapid additions of the same pieces of trivia to multiple articles, like the breaking of sections into one-line sunsections, are just giving fellow editors the trouble of studying Hopeful2014's contribution history to discover how many articles need cleaning. NebY (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Please talk

Wikipedia's a collaborative project. We build on foundations laid by other editors, we correct each other and we learn from each other. We don't do that, we can't do that, just by editing articles. We have to talk together on article talk pages and on user talk pages, like this one. We also leave edit summaries explaining our edits. @Hopeful2014:,you need to start doing these things. You could be a great contributor to the encyclopedia if you'd talk with other editors about what you're doing, about what needs doing and about what shouldn't be done. If you don't and other editors have to run after you cleaning up, then eventually you'll be seen as a problem, called "disruptive" and even prevented from editing. If you do discuss, you'll be welcomed, you'll be helped, and you'll have the pleasure of seeing other editors building on the foundations you've laid. So please, talk. NebY (talk) 13:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Camden Town tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hackney, Stratford and Richmond

Bow Interchange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stratford

Dartford railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fastrack

Tower Gateway DLR station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Circle Line

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. By re-making the same edits (to e.g. Royal Victoria DLR station and North Greenwich tube station) that others have previously reverted, you are clearly ignoring the advice previously offered on this page. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Guidance on links

We don't wikilink words and terms in section headers. Indeed, we take care to avoid confronting the reader with a sea of blue links. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking is worth reading, most particularly WP:LINKSTYLE and WP:OVERLINK. NebY (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Cycle Route 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Enfield

National Cycle Route 13 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blackwall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of active separatist movements in Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkmen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of active separatist movements in Africa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kabyle, Coptic and Somali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lakeside Shopping Centre may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Ensignbus]] and [[First Essex|First]] also providing regular bus services to the centre. Route X80]] operated by [[Ensignbus]] provides a link to [[Bluewater (shopping centre)|Bluewater]] across the [

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bow Road tube station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[London Buses route 25|25]] ([[Oxford Circus]]-[[Ilford]] ''High Street'' (24-hours service)
• *[[List of night buses in London#N205|N205]] ([[Paddington station]]-[[Leyton]] ''Temple Mills Lane''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Saints DLR station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[London Buses route N550|N550]] ([[Trafalgar Square]]-[[Canning Town bus station|Canning Town]]
• *[[London Buses route N551|N551]] ([[Trafalgar Square]]-[[Gallions Reach]] ''Retail Park''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blackwall DLR station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[London Buses route D6|D6]] ([[Cambridge Heath railway station|Ash Grove]]-[[Crossharbour]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tower Gateway DLR station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[London Buses route N15|N15]] ([[Trafalgar Square]]-[[Romford Market]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East London Transit

added links pointing to Go-Ahead and Ibus

List of active separatist movements in North America

added links pointing to Cascadia and Puerto Rican

Wimbledon station

added links pointing to Wimbledon and Rose Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

London Buses route 254

added a link pointing to Aldgate station

Stratford International station

added a link pointing to Clapton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aldgate bus station

added a link pointing to Holloway

Stratford City bus station

added a link pointing to Stratford

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Farringdon station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Farringdon

Smithfield, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Farringdon

South Hackney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hackney

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cambridge Heath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hackney

Farringdon station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Farringdon

Hackney Central (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hackney

Smithfield, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Farringdon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hopeful2014. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canary Wharf tube station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of night buses in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackwall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2018 Bow stabbing

The article 2018 Bow stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. Too early to say if this incident will have a lasting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Galvanisers Union

Hello Hopeful2014,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Galvanisers Union for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 16:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Hopeful2014. If you continue to make mass changes from 'Byzantine' to 'Roman' you will most likely be blocked. It may be your personal opinion that the Byzantines were actually Romans, but you can't put that in Wikipedia unless you can provide a source that confirms it in every case. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Unblocked Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hopeful2014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would love to be unblocked and be permitted to resume editing again in a respectful manner and start anew, I have reviewed the Wikipedia terms and conditions and gained an understanding on why I was blocked in the first place. I feel like I should be unblocked as I have learned what I did was a truly wrong and a mistake and harmful. Trying to edit while blocked was an mistake and also copying rights editing is not allowed on here and I now know that this was all an error and poor judgement and I am sorry for this. I also now understand also that speaking with other users is the best way forward. I really do promise not to do so again. I feel like I could if I was unblocked followed the rules be able to be a good editor and contribute to Wikipedia and improve on articles, the main focus if unblocked would be London based. I would not vandalised and abuse Wikipedia as has done before and explain each edit each time.

I will respect if the final decision is no and will move on from Wikipedia for good if this is the case and outcome. Hopeful2014 (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were using a confirmed sockpuppet just a couple days ago! Read the standard offer and follow that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User has engaged in continued ban evasion after the above unblock request was declined, as Globetownexists. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 14:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 10:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 14:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 22:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hopeful2014, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lord Belbury (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)