Welcome!

Hello, Hallovan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vaughn Patterson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Vaughn Patterson

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vaughn Patterson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mathtology

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mathtology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Carnivorous Bunny (talk) 04:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Phineas and Ferb (season 4), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. References, when used, must say something about the info they purport to support Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2014

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Disney Channel (Asia) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Gilkes (footballer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident was changed by Hallovan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954248 on 2014-01-14T21:16:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Walt Disney World, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Walt Disney World was changed by Hallovan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965693 on 2014-01-14T21:17:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 21:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply