Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Pinner

edit

Hello Haivri,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Pinner for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  M2Ys4U (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David Haivri-2015.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:David Haivri-2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:ARBPIA3

edit

Please read this: editors who have less than 500 edits/30 days tenure "are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict." This includes *all* Israeli settlements on the occupied Palestinian West Bank. Regarding your edits to David Ha'ivri: please read WP:COI, thanks, Huldra (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinchas Taylor (December 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Theroadislong Thank you for your input and advice. I will review and decide how to proceed with this project. Much appreciated. Haivri (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Haivri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Theroadislong Thanks. Haivri (talk) 13:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply