GreenCows

Some baklava for you!

For your help on the War in Afghanistan, and fixing my many mistakes :P have some baklava to keep you going! Its a beast of an article and much appreciated. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

List of anthropogenic disasters

Hello sir,

All of the edits made were either linked to Wikipedia articles with listed death tolls, or else had yet to have the university of Hawaii cited. Part of the problem was that I was in the process of cleaning up and completing the article.

With regards to Winston Churchill, I will make the Low estimate only the bombing of dresden while the high estimate with include the famine in Bengals highest death toll from its wikipedia article and also a set of citations claiming Winston's government was responsible for the famine.

For fdr and Harry Truman, I was referencing the Wikipedia articles which detailed the bombing of Japan by the US during World War II, as well as the no gun RI massacre.

None of this is original research save the mathematical process of adding together different death tolls. It probably bore the appearance of original research as I am not very skilled at the stylistic formatting side of Wikipedia editing.

I should also provide death toll citations for those who are referenced elsewhere in Wikipedia, this will take more time than citin get University of hawaii.

I hope this doesnt cause many problems. Hong kuslauski (talk) 19:46, 3 December 202Hawaii.

Once more we could potentially collaborate in verifying body counts for the events linked to other Wikipedia pages.

Nafeez Ahmed & Byline Times

Hello, GreenCows you have deleted the estimate regarding Nafeez Ahmed multiple times; stating he is not reliable.

How is he unreliable when he is an academic and former guardian journalist? Also, I am attributing the estimate to him. And there is no evidence for Byline Times as being unreliable as well. shadowwarrior8 ( talk ) 17 July 2022 18:11 UTC

Is this wording acceptable to you? "British investigative journalist and academic Nafeez Ahmed estimates that about six million deaths have been caused by the War."

Waiting for your response, GreenCows shadowwarrior8 ( talk ) 18 July 2022 19:34 UTC

Hello, it's unreliable and undue as it's a fringe estimate that is far higher than other epidemiological surveys on excess deaths for these conflicts. This estimate hasn't been quoted in any mainstream sources. Nafeez Ahmed is also not an expert in epidemiology and arbitrarily multiplies direct deaths by 4 to create his own estimate. His estimate of excess deaths in Iraq is much higher than PLOS survey and even the controversial Lancet survey. His calculations are also far higher than the United Nations' own estimate of excess deaths due to the Yemeni civil war. Nafeez Ahmed is also controversial because he has been accused of association with 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Additionally, what is the point of the second source? It's a duplicate of Ahmed's article from the first source but in a website for online teaching resources. GreenCows (talk) 10:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

References

September 2022 Iraq War

Hi GreenCows, can you explain your logic to me in saying that post invasion is more accurate than occupation..thanks Unnecessarily (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

re: "Texian immigrant would imply an immigrant from Texas." definition of immigrant, the word immigrant means a person who has come TO the place, emigrant is a person who has come FROM the place.GalantFan (talk) 18:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Mention at ANI ... in a good way

Hey, please see this ANI thread. Anything you have to add there would be appreciated. Graham87 10:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Stumink per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 14:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)