G-Toasty
Welcome!
edit
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan The Man (March 25)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan The Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dan The Man, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, G-Toasty!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 05:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
|
- @Liance Okay. I can work with this, but on the topic of YouTube, those videos are official, and are where the developer primarily provides information about the story. G-Toasty (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hey G-Toasty. At first glance I would say that the subject you are writing is notable considering coverage on Metacritic, and it would be able to pass WP:NGAME so I encourage you to keep working on the draft. Just make sure to cite those sources to meet the notability criteria.
- As for your question about YT videos, we tend to avoid citing YouTube as non-user generated sources are preferred but if the videos are reliable (in this case, published by the developer) then they are OK. Generally gameplay and plot summary does not need citations so long as they do not state any contentious material, but citing the videos is fine. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 01:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Liance It very much does, thanks you so much G-Toasty (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi G-Toasty! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan The Man (March 27)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan The Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dan The Man, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan the Man has been accepted
editCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)"Wanted articles" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wanted articles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 21#Wanted articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)