Fornax

Ways to improve Sauerkraut missions

Hello, Fornax,

Thank you for creating Sauerkraut missions.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

@Abishe:

Hello, Abishe, thank you for the message. In this respect I have a few questions and would like to make some comments.

First point: (This article needs additional citations for verification.) Since there is currently only one source available, it would only be possible to refer to the different sections of this one source. However, I do not think this approach makes much sense.

Second point:(This article needs more article-links to integrate with Wikipedia.) I cannot understand this. The article contains 30 or 40 links to relevant articles. Where should I place more? Of course you can link every word...

Third point:(This article relies largely or entirely on a single source.) Unfortunately there are apparently no other sources on this topic at the moment. However, it is obviously a very reliable source. Original documents and original photos are shown, which leaves little doubt about the authenticity of the story.

How many sources are necessary to satisfactorily document an article?--Fornax (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fornax

Thank you for creating Operation Periwig.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Overall ok but more sources needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 06:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)