Fannybandit

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Fraslet 19:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Fraslet 19:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fraslet 19:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fraslet 19:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Fraslet's user page [1] was unwelcome. I suggest you refrain from any further discussion with Fraslet about the incident and go on to edit constructively. —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

The edit I linked to above is the "vandalism" in question. It was an edit to a user page, so yes, it is vandalism by definition. —C.Fred (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for three hours for the continuous harassment of User:Fraslet‎. Owen× ☎ 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

WTF?

What did i do to "harass" him? --Fannybandit 20:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Harrasmant is defined by the actor ought to have known, or reasonably known, is wrong, that is the continuing of being rude, or discriminating. Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 20:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, i have done none of those things you have mentioned --Fannybandit 20:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes you have, do not argue with me, or your ban may be longer. Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 20:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

So, I gather, none of these are your edits: [2], [3], [4], [5], right? Play dumb and I'll gladly extend your block. Owen× ☎ 20:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, calm down, im sorry, im not trying to argue, i did do those, but they werent on any real pages, if anything he was rude to me by not replying --Fannybandit 20:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Userpage

I have removed the Hate comment:
I HATE Fraslet, could anybody else help me vandalise his user or talk page??? I am requesting page protection. If you will, Owen? Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 20:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok i'm sorry but, FUCK OFF, thats my userpage, surely i can write what i want on it? --Fannybandit 20:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Answer Me

Could somebody answer me? --Fannybandit 21:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi! Please can you tell us what question you would like answered? :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I wanted to know if i could write anything i want on my userpage? --Fannybandit 21:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi! See WP:USER. :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

None of our user pages are really our own, so you can not write anything on your user page. There is certainly a degree of latitude given to user pages compared to article pages, but there are some rules you have to follow. By the way, the sort of comments that you made in the previous section and go against the no personal attacks policy of wikipedia. If you continue in that fashion, you'll get blocked in no time. As wikipedia is a collaborative project, we all have to be civil to each other. - TwoOars 21:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Well to be honest, im only telling the truth, he's rude, he never replies to me --Fannybandit 21:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

No one is obliged to reply. This is a purely voluntary enterprise. - TwoOars 21:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

But I still hate him --Fannybandit 21:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

lol

Lol, Fraslet moved his account because of me. Get it up ye Fraslet.lol --Fannybandit 21:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a sockpuppet!

{{helpme}}

I've been blocked for being a sockpuppet when i'm not --Fannybandit 18:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see the above section on how to appeal a block. KTC 18:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fannybandit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been blocked for being a sockpuppet when i'm not

Decline reason:

Even if you were unblocked for not being a sockpuppet, you could still be blocked as a vandalism-only account, based on your history toward another user on here. Valid reason exists for a block, and it is preventative in nature (i.e. avoiding future harassment). Block sustained. —C.Fred (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, i know what your saying, but if you just give one chance i'll go and edit wikipedia in a positive manner, i promise, and if i break it you can block me again --Fannybandit 18:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Block

{{helpme}}

Could someone please inform User:C.Fred of my comment above --Fannybandit 18:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Sure. ~ Wikihermit 18:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, could somebody inform another admin about the block plea above. thanks --Fannybandit 19:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

No. Stop abusing the {{helpme}} template. ~ Wikihermit 19:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Based on your abuse of the {{helpme}} template, this talk page has been protected. —C.Fred (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)