User talk:FULBERT/Archive 183

Latest comment: 7 days ago by FULBERT in topic Week 6/ Myeon
Archive 180Archive 181Archive 182Archive 183

Week 4/Myeon

So this week I edited two articles on the Wikipedia platform.

The first one is 'Job Satisificition.' For the session of 'Influencing factors', I add a topic about 'The Influence of Remote Work and Digital Transformation on Job Satisfaction'. This could have enriched the article by providing information about yet another factor influencing job satisfaction as companies move to a phase of digital transformation after the epidemic. Here is the article, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Job_satisfaction&wvprov=sticky-header. And here is the difference, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Job_satisfaction&diff=prev&oldid=1255600837.

The second one is 'Educational technology'. I added a new paragraph to the "Benefits" section, introducing the advantages of generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education. This addition highlights AI’s role in supporting personalized learning, motivating students, and aiding in complex tasks, thereby expanding the article's coverage of educational technology's benefits. Here is the article, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Educational_technology&wvprov=sticky-header. And here is the difference, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Educational_technology&diff=prev&oldid=1255606625.

With practicing using Wikipedia, the process taught me to adhere to neutral language and reliable sourcing, ensuring that contributions meet Wikipedia's standards. I also developed a deeper understanding of how to structure information to make it accessible to a broad audience. Overall, this practice enhanced my ability to contribute to collaborative knowledge-sharing platforms and strengthened my critical thinking and writing skills.

MyeonD (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@MyeonD:, Why is it that the message you wrote above to your instructor, as well as the contents you're adding to articles are coming back as 100% AI in GPTZero? It returns "We are highly confident this text was ai generated 100%Probability AI generated" Please do not add undisclosed AI contents into articles, including one I just got done cleaning out AI trash out of a few days ago. Graywalls (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
@MyeonD Please schedule time with me to discuss the feedback @MyeonD provided here before doing any additional edits.
@Graywalls Thank you for your helpful feedback and ongoing editing in this area, one that will increasingly become more complex.
--- FULBERT (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk Done. Thank you for the reminder. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
907   Retrieval-augmented generation (talk) Add sources
180   527 organization (talk) Add sources
843   Thesis (talk) Add sources
587   Oklahoma State Cowboys football (talk) Add sources
17   Environmental sustainability of vintage fashion (talk) Add sources
149   Precancerous condition (talk) Add sources
39   Economics of climate change mitigation (talk) Cleanup
276   Theories about religion (talk) Cleanup
398   Hypnotherapy (talk) Cleanup
146   Climate change in Europe (talk) Expand
4,261   Parkinson's disease (talk) Expand
46   Politics of Honduras (talk) Expand
178   Spiritualism (beliefs) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3   BAD RAP (organization) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
55   Cowboy coding (talk) Unencyclopaedic
29   Political party committee (talk) Merge
34   Hill committee (talk) Merge
43   Amphetamine type stimulant (talk) Merge
110   Best Friends Animal Society (talk) Wikify
14   Gyalis (talk) Wikify
37   Environmental issues in Africa (talk) Wikify
5   Tracy Gray (investor) (talk) Orphan
8   Anas Kaliisa (talk) Orphan
24   Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay (talk) Orphan
8   FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life (talk) Stub
9   Ministry of Tourism (Zimbabwe) (talk) Stub
54   Mara (Hindu goddess) (talk) Stub
18   Laguiole cheese (talk) Stub
207   Ghana Freedom Party (talk) Stub
28   Yakima Valley AVA (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Philosophical pessimism and Talk:History of philosophical pessimism on "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 4/ Qiuyi Y

The first article I edited is Social anxiety disorder. This article is talking about social anxiety disorder is a condition characterized by intense fear of social situations, influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Treatment typically includes therapy, medication, or a combination of approaches to help individuals manage symptoms and improve their quality of life. I learned that social anxiety disorder is influenced by both genetics and environmental factors, with family history and observed behaviors playing significant roles. This insight emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to treatment that addresses both inherited tendencies and learned behaviors. And here is the diff.

The second article I edited is Test anxiety. This article is talking about Test anxiety is a condition where students experience stress and worry that can negatively impact their test performance. Key causes include fear of failure, parental pressure, and prior negative experiences with testing. Strategies such as cognitive-behavioral techniques and modifying the testing environment can help students manage and reduce anxiety. I learned that test anxiety stems from both internal fears and external pressures, affecting students physically and mentally. Managing it through cognitive-behavioral techniques and supportive testing environments can help improve student performance and reduce stress. And here is the diff.

Qiuyi Yang (talk) 01:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@Qiuyi Y Your edits were both reverted. Many parts of your writing feel like they were developed using Al, with the direct output here not being your own work. Per our course AI Policy, while AI tools can provide valuable assistance, it is crucial for students to understand that the final output and submission must be their own writing. While AI may be helpful for ideation, you must critically evaluate the suggestions provided by AI tools and make informed decisions about incorporating the ideas, and not the direct words, into your own work. Always contextualize your work to reflect your own understanding of the credible and reliable source you cite to support your statements. Please review the Wikipedia guidance at WP:LLM, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:PROOF. Please schedule time to meet with me and discuss before doing any additional Wikipedia edits. FULBERT (talk) 18:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 4 / Mak9991

The first article I edited is Dubai and here is the diff. The second article I edited is Smart City and here is the diff. Through these edits, I learned how to improve clarity and structure, and ensure that the content aligns with the intended message. Mak9991 (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

@Mak9991 Nice edits. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week4 / santi2727

The first article that I edited is Motorcycle helmet, here is the diff. The second article I edited is Self-driving car, here is the diff.This week, I learned that it's essential to periodically update the article to keep it current with new technology and terminology, ensuring it remains relevant. In the article I edited, the original text only included technologies from a decade ago, without mentioning any recent innovations. Santi2727 (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

@Santi2727 Nice edits. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 4 / DOSTPIDE

The first article I edited is Occupational injury, here is the diff. The second article I edited is Job satisfaction, here is the diff. I've added research findings to add factual information and value to the articles. DOSTPIDE (talk) 00:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

@DOSTPIDE Nice edits. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 4/ nutnutt12

The first article I edited is https://w.wiki/Buam, and here is the differ: https://w.wiki/Buao.

I included a statement that highlights how creativity without execution is only a concept, but innovation results in tangible effects, to further clarify the difference between the two. The argument that innovation entails the implementation of creative ideas was strengthened by the extra sentence, which served to highlight the practical relevance of innovation in comparison to creativity.

The second article I edited is https://w.wiki/Buaz, and here is the differ: https://w.wiki/Bua$.

I included information about the practical and emotional barriers of cultural adjustment, such mental fatigue from juggling many cultural identities, vulnerability, and difficulties with everyday tasks.I also emphasized the psychological effects, concentrating on identity uncertainty, loneliness, and possible despair, particularly among overseas students. I also provided a reference to back up the section on the psychological impacts of cultural adjustment.

Through this process, I discovered how crucial it is to properly cite sources for statements made in order to bolster the argument and provide a clear link to reliable sources. I was able to improve the content's academic integrity and provide a deeper comprehension of the subjects covered by using citations. Nutnutt12 (talk) 04:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

@Nutnutt12 Nice edits. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 18:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week4/zw2306

For this week, I choose to add citations to two articles. The first article I chose to edit is https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Marketing_strategy The article has multiple issues and I chose to make one edit in the “Marketing management versus marketing strategy” section. This section is highlighted as having excessive quotes so I rewrote the first paragraph into two, to remove the quotes/plagiarism. I also added two citations. Here is the Diff

The second article that I chose to edit is https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Organizational_culture. One of the problem the article has is that requires additional citations for verification. So, I choose to add two more citations. Here is the diff

This assignment helped improve my editing skills, especially adding citations and references. Zw2306 (talk) 01:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

@Zw2306 You should always be logged in when you make edits, as your edits did not connect with you. Also, I am not clear what happened with your citations or some specifics with your edits. Please schedule time to meet with me to discuss before doing any additional edits. FULBERT (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 4/ Qiuyi Y

I choose two new articles for my week 4.

The first one is Light Pollution. I learned how light pollution affects health. Here is the diff.

The second one is Packaging waste. I learned that the growth of e-commerce has greatly increased the complexity and volume of packaging waste, highlighting the need for sustainable solutions in the industry. Here is the diff.

Qiuyi Yang (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Your first edit was fine, but your second edit did not use a high-quality citation. OK for now, but please use a higher quality source in the future. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Week 5/Roger0731

The first ariticle is Agile management, here the diff.This article simply introduces the definition of agile management and its management method - Scrum.

The second ariticle is Innovation mangement, here the diff. This article describes the definition of innovation management and the directions in which it is used in enterprises. Technological changes bring many innovative capabilities to enterprises, and introduces ten major innovation management tools.

In these two articles, I learned about agile management methods and the importance of creativity in this area of ​​management.Roger0731 (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Many parts of your writing feel like they were developed using Al, with the direct output here not being your own work. Per our course AI Policy, while AI tools can provide valuable assistance, it is crucial for students to understand that the final output and submission must be their own writing. While AI may be helpful for ideation, you must critically evaluate the suggestions provided by AI tools and make informed decisions about incorporating the ideas, and not the direct words, into your own work. Always contextualize your work to reflect your own understanding of the credible and reliable source you cite to support your statements. Please review the Wikipedia guidance at WP:LLM, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:PROOF. Please either re-edit the Wikipedia article you edited with information in your own words while using a high-quality citation to a source you have read, or please schedule time with me to discuss. Ping me in a new post with a link to your edits when finished and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)


Week 5/BJ2352

My first article is E-commerce in China. Here is the diff. I added a short paragraph about how e-commerce in China is rising through mobile payment platforms.

My second article is QR code payment. Here is the diff. I added a paragraph about how Indonesia can use QR code payment methods in their public transport to promote a cashless society.

These two article all related about cashless payment and these consumption patterns influence consumer behavior and payment systems around the world. BJ2352 (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

BJ2352 Your second edit is fine, but related to your first edit, please be aware that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia WP:ENC, and as such it is important to maintain a neutral point of view WP:NPOV that avoids jargon, opinions, exaggerations, and any claims that are not represented fairly and proportionately. It may be helpful to review what Wikipedia is not WP:NOT. OK for now and current with Week 5. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Week 5 / nutnutt12

The first article I edited is https://w.wiki/C2dB, and here is the differ: https://w.wiki/C2dm.

I added a phrase to the topic on regional racism in Asia to highlight how historical conflicts, economic struggle, and geopolitical tensions contribute to stereotypes and prejudices. This addendum emphasizes the damaging impact such preconceptions have on collaboration and mutual respect among nations with cultural and ethnic similarities.

The second article I edited is https://w.wiki/C2en, and here is the differ: https://w.wiki/C2eo.

I extended the text by including a statement that stresses the historical relevance of the 1619 Thanksgiving celebration. The rewritten phrase emphasizes how this early commemoration created the groundwork for the current Thanksgiving holiday, highlighting the settlers' religious commitment and thanks. It also discusses how the celebration evolved from a local event in Virginia to a nationally known holiday throughout the United States.

Throughout this process, I discovered the importance of not just including relevant sources, but also ensuring that they provide depth and meaning to the conversation. Nutnutt12 (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Nutnutt12 (talk Nice edits. Current with Week 5. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Week 5/JANJAY10

I edited the articles Subsistence agriculture and Precision agriculture by citing sources to discuss the topics. Here are the diff [1] and [2]. I learned how to give information that is well put together, objective, and backed by credible sources. JANJAY10 (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

JANJAY10 Many parts of your writing feel like they were developed using Al, with the direct output here not being your own work. Per our course AI Policy, while AI tools can provide valuable assistance, it is crucial for students to understand that the final output and submission must be their own writing. While AI may be helpful for ideation, you must critically evaluate the suggestions provided by AI tools and make informed decisions about incorporating the ideas, and not the direct words, into your own work. Always contextualize your work to reflect your own understanding of the credible and reliable source you cite to support your statements. Please review the Wikipedia guidance at WP:LLM, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:PROOF. Please either re-edit the Wikipedia article you edited with information in your own words while using a high-quality citation to a source you have read, or please schedule time with me to discuss. Ping me here when finished and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)


Week 5 / Mak9991

  1. Edited the article BMW. Here is the diff.
  2. Edited the article Blockchain. Here is the diff.

With these edits, I appreciate the deeper insight I have gained into both topics. Mak9991 (talk) 02:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Mak9991 Your first edit did not add anything of substance to the article. I cannot locate your second edit based on your diff. Please re-edit these in a new section on my Talk page to adjust or further develop what you edited. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nation of Islam on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:William C. Roberts (pastor) on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Week 6/Sp7930

For this week, add citations to two articles. The first article I chose to edit is Security Management and here is the diff. In this article, I added a citation to define what security management entails. I learned that security management involves various types of risks that can be mitigated through effective security risk management strategies.

The second article I chose to edit is Risk Management and here is the diff. The citation I added highlights that risk management planning employs four essential techniques. I learned that these techniques form a comprehensive framework for businesses to manage and mitigate risks effectively. Sp7930 (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Sp7930 Your first edit does not fit into the lead per WP:LEAD, which states that the top, or lead, of an article should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points of the article, without including new information that is not covered in the remainder of the article. As instructed previously, do not add new information to the lead. Move your edit to where they will fit better and ping me in a new section. Your second edit is fine. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

Week 6/ Myeon

This week, I continued to edit two more articles. The first one is Job security, and here is the difference, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Job_security&diff=prev&oldid=1258261597. Base on the information I learned from a reference, I write a short paragraph about the influence of career adaptability on job security. Try to make the article more comprehensive. And the second one is https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Workforce_management&wvprov=sticky-header, and here is the difference, https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Workforce_management&diff=prev&oldid=1258297935.

After weeks of practice, I became proficient at editing articles using Wikipedia and tried to do a better job of it without the help of AI tools.

MyeonD (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

MyeonD Nice edits. Current with Week 6. FULBERT (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #654