Dorshil
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, Dorshil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Somerset Rural Life Museum. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
— Rod talk 08:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Date links
editHi, thanks for your contributions. Please note that WP doesn't normally link dates, years, months, etc. (Lionel Asbo: State of England) Tony (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. Dorshil (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Zone of interest cover.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zone of interest cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed by Theo's Little Bot. At least now I know how to tag book cover rationale.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Dorshil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editDaniel Dor moved to draftspace (Unsourced article about a living person)
editAn article you recently created, Daniel Dor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 17:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Of course. Thanks, will add refs shortly Shilton (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Joseywales1961: Can the review process be speeded up, given it is just one ref added? Shilton (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Dorshil, Thank you for creating this article. At the moment all of the references are from primary sources (himself and/or his university CV). It will need at least one reliable, third party source (such as a quality newspaper article) that confirms at least one of the statements in the article - see WP:BLP, WP:RS and WP:Primary. The article looks well and I see all the ISBNs in place so it should make the grade with the reliable source. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 20:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Joseywales1961. Added two external sources, one is from the Oxford University Press website. Shilton (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Dorshil, Moved and reviewed - happy editing JW 1961 Talk 21:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Joseywales1961. Added two external sources, one is from the Oxford University Press website. Shilton (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Dorshil, Thank you for creating this article. At the moment all of the references are from primary sources (himself and/or his university CV). It will need at least one reliable, third party source (such as a quality newspaper article) that confirms at least one of the statements in the article - see WP:BLP, WP:RS and WP:Primary. The article looks well and I see all the ISBNs in place so it should make the grade with the reliable source. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 20:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Daniel Dor
editHello, Dorshil,
Thank you for creating Daniel Dor.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Just the academic career and activism section, make sure the references in there are not from his own sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.