Don't use to eidet

Welcome!

Hi Don't use to eidet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! SunloungerFrog (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

1986 Oklahoma Roughnecks

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, 1986 Oklahoma Roughnecks, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:1986 Oklahoma Roughnecks where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. I really recommend that you work on the article in draftspace, making sure that it is properly sourced and referenced using reliable and independent sources, before you decide to move it back to mainspace. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 19:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:1986 Oklahoma Roughnecks

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:1986 Oklahoma Roughnecks, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Oklahoma roughnecks Vs Minnesota vikings

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Oklahoma roughnecks Vs Minnesota vikings, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Posting fiction and unverifiable information

• I have reviewed a sample of your editing, including deleted edits. I have not seen a single edit for which I could find any confirmation in any reliable source. I have seen some edits which I have been able to establish were certainly false, and I have found some which are similar to material on "fantasy" websites and similar sources.
• There are many websites where you can play around and post fiction if you wish to, but Wikipedia is not one of them.
• Wikipedia content should be supported by references to reliable sources. To some extent we may allow some leeway, but in view of your history, it makes sense to give you no leeway: from now on make sure that all edits you make are supported by references to reliable sources. To see how to do so, read the guides to citing sources and to reliable sources.
• To avoid any possibility of doubt, Wikipedia policy is that any article content not supported by suitable references may be removed without notice, and must not be restored without providing a citation to a reliable source.
• Editors who persist in making unconstructive edits may be blocked from editing by administrators. JBW (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

One other point. No Wikipedia page is to be used for storing content for private purposes, unrelated to work for the encyclopaedia. That includes user pages and sandboxes. JBW (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)