Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Dohhh22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter

edit

The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter

edit

The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Double_Indemnity_Cast.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Double_Indemnity_Cast.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use of images

edit

BTW, I see you haven't added a detailed fair use rationale for the screencaps you've uploaded. There needs to be a rationale specific to each article the image is used in. I believe there is a bot that checks the images for this, notifies the uploader, and eventually deletes the image if a valid rationale isn't provided. Just FYI... Yworo (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter

edit

The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 06:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Writer credits in the film infobox

edit

Hey there! :-) The discussion on the writer credits in the film infobox has really picked up in the last few days (basically all comments starting from July 30th), and we're now getting closer to a consensus. Currently, we are trying to determine if there are any objections to adding the fields "Screenplay by" and "Story by". The discussion is still located here. If you have read up on the suggestions and have any objections to these two fields, please post here. If some time goes by without objections, we will take these additions for granted and move on to the next solution. Thank you in advance! Prime Blue (talk) 16:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Dohhh22! We've had some updates on the talk page and it seems we are currently heading towards giving the original work title and the author in "easy" cases, and not to use that field for problematic cases like films based on multiple works (remakes, etc.). I just wanted to ask if this would be okay with you. Prime Blue (talk) 20:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Double Indemnity Project Part 5

edit

We're due for a new section. If you feel like your page is all cluttered up, I think it'd be fine to dump the old DI Project sections, rather than archive 'em. I always put a link in the title for easy, direct, hopping to the article. Whadda guy, eh?

I tried to find a Wilder photo at the Lib of Congress, where the photos are public domain, but no luck. I was also hoping to find a shot from the premiere of DI, but absolutely nothin'. I prefer the younger Wilder shots, in a sweater w/o glasses, to the older ones; they not only look more like 1944, they look more like studio publicity shots. A Wilder photo down at the end will really finish it off nicely, but should probably be the last one we argue fair-use for; too many and we're asking for trouble. I wish the screencaps were about 33% larger, but I don't want to get back into that bee's nest.

You really moved fast on those footenotes! I'm impressed. I really like the way this is shaping up. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Howdy. I went through the whole piece and made a few adds and a few cleans... but I think we're just a Wilder photo away from Miller Time. (Hope you're not too young to get that reference.) — HarringtonSmith (talk) 03:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Always looking for work for you to do. I think we could use a cite here after the list of actors who declined the Neff role. Also maybe here too, after the quoted phrase "useless camera instruction." These just strike me as spots where someone'll slug in a [citation needed] tag. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

My last tough subject to bring up: I usually see footnotes done with the full listing — with city and publisher and ISBN — in the first mention, then "Surname, p. xxx," in subsequent cites. When one author has more than one entry (we have one like this, Phillips), entries after the first mention would be: "Phillips, Creatures, p. 112" or "Phillips, Some Like, p. 153." The good news: I can do the clerical work on this, and would be delighted to do so if you give me the word. (I hope doing it the other way didn't cost you too much time.) Let me know and I'll do the legwork. If you prefer it the way it is now, that's fine, too. Just let me know. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:45, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

You mad at me about the footnotes? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, was computerless over the weekend (roughing it in the woods). Whatever looks good or is the standard on the footnotes is ok with me. If you want to knock that out, no problem. I will work on those other cites.Dohhh22 (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Great! I'll do it. How does the thing look to you after a weekend in the WILDERness? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wow. You have been busy! It looks great. Like you said, I think it is ready for prime time. That last photo would cap it off.Dohhh22 (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I didn't want to jump in because I don't know if you are editing right now and don't want to mess you up, but De Sylva was Paramount's artistic director at the time when the Rozsa/Lipstone incident occured and just happened to be producing Double Indemnity as well.Dohhh22 (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I was working off his wikipedia entry which had him as exec producer at Paramount in 1944, but I'll take your source any day! Fix it if you haven't already. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Switched it back to Artistic Director — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Have a look hereHarringtonSmith (talk) 04:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I like it! I think it really adds the right punch to the end. I will see if I can get my hands on those last two books today and finish off the citations. This article really does look great. Thanks for all the help!Dohhh22 (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, you knew it was coming. I don't know where you found the picture, but looks like we will have to justify it.Dohhh22 (talk) 01:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't the source of the photo or the use rationale the guy objected to — he didn't think there was enough "critical discussion" of it in the text. (The file is still up, he just removed it from the article.) If you check his contribs, you'll see that he just sits there and bounces photos, scores of 'em, one after another, never making a positive contribution, just being a bully. The text is nothing but Wilder, and that photo enhanced the readability of the page. Which is what really makes me sick about this place: improving the reading experience of the readers is the last thing on the minds of some editors; they're out to gratify their tough-guy egos as self-appointed nay-sayers and deleters. That's the fatal flaw of Wikipedia, and why it'll never be a great thing — because it doesn't care about its end-users. I understand the need to be careful about copyright issues, but I also know that that photo deletion was just a guy getting his rocks off. It hurt the article, and there's not a damn thing we can do about it. I'm this close to walking out of here and never coming back. I know my onions about publishing and I'm sick of being thwarted by editors who don't.
Thanks for listening. P.S.: it was a nice, touching caption, don't you think? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
The photo is now showing up as an orphan, which makes it a more prominent target for deletion. I tried putting it on my own page, but the system doesn't seem to recognize that as an article. Ah well. I'm getting to hate this place. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I take it back — s/he has started quite a few articles. There was a real jag of photo deletions, though. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kind of ridiculous, I agree.Dohhh22 (talk) 18:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I sent a respectful note to him/her, arguing that Wilder was central to the development of the film, but s/he was unmoved, saying that the picture didn't enhance readers' understanding, it only showed what Wilder looked like. No change of mind. That's why so many articles here are just vast wastes of gray. Pity. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Man, I just read the justification and I have to tell you, that argument just seems like opinion to me. There is no set of criteria that you can peg against to say it does or does not enhance the article for the reader, so how can it be argued that it does not?Dohhh22 (talk) 01:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
There hasn't been an edit since that one, so you could undo it. I don't feel I should undo it because it could be construed as starting an edit war. The choice is yours; you have my full backing (for all that's worth) whatever you decide. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hiya, Dohhh... No, I don't consider "our" article (don't let anyone hear that!) done, I'm just a little discouraged about that photo getting yanked. I poked around the Library of Congress looking for a public domain image — which we could dig in and keep reinstating because it's p.d. — but to no avail; the only Wilder photos they had were clearly Sunset or Some Like It Hot and wouldn't've worked like the one we had. I couldda sworn I once saw a Carl Van Vechten shot of him in the early '40s, and all those Van Vechtens are in the LOC and are p.d., but damned if I can find it. You still proud of the article? I am. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
WOW, Dohhh!!! Your music add is GREAT!!! Nice touch!!HarringtonSmith (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. I think it came out great! I don't think there is much else that could be added.Dohhh22 (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
That goddamn picture could be, goddamit. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I gave the article another look tonight and really liked what I saw. You do nice work, Dohhh! Despite what Wilder said about a collaboration needing lots of contention, working with you was my most enjoyable Wikipedia experience, bar none. Thank you for it! — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It was nice working with you as well. Maybe we will do another one sometime. I do like the way this came out despite not getting the pictures we wanted!Dohhh22 (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
You missed the fireworks tonight. An editor came in and rewrote the captions, in too many passes just to undo, so I had to try to fix 'em all by hand. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Unbelievable. Why do people feel the need to come in and make their stupid little preferential wording tweaks? Go work on an article that obviously has not had any effort put into it. There has to be a million of them out there.Dohhh22 (talk) 02:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It turned out okay. After batting it back and forth a couple times, s/he went elsewhere. Which is fine. When I realize I've stumbled upon an article someone has/is cultivating, I always defer to them. I was hot at the time, but it turned out fine. (Still wish the trailer-playing box was bigger, though... go look how big the one is at Bonnie & Clyde. That's the size I'm used to seeing around the place here.
You realize, of course, you and I are like some couple who've had a child... there'll always be this article holding us together. I ran here right away after fixing the captions to tell you all about it! Hahahahaha! — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply


>Standing, smiling, applauding...< HooRAY, hooRAY, hooRAY! ! ! [see below] — HarringtonSmith (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, thank you. As much yours as mine. Honestly, I never would have gotten this far without your help.Dohhh22 (talk) 16:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hey, Dohhh, how've you been? I got a note warning me that they're warming up to delete that Wilder photo which has been an unattached orphan. If we're going to try and get it back in, we — meaning you :) — need to try it in the next couple days before it gets deleted. I myself have been discouraged about this place. I've got an IP-account editor who's deleting stuff from my poor little hundred-hit-a-month Laurel & Hardy Silents articles, and it's gonna prove to be my tipping point. How you been doing? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC) http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/e/ef/BillyWilderParamountPubPhoto1942.pngReply

Double Indemnity

edit
  The WikiProject Films Award
I, for your all your hard work and wonderful improvements to Double Indemnity, hereby award Dohhh22 the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to WikiProject Films. Yworo (talk)
Awarded 14:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter

edit

The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open

edit

The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Infobox film

edit

Hey. It appears that the discussion of how to use the "Based on" field has died out completely. As many issues are still unresolved, I feel that we need to breathe new life into the discussion.–FunkyVoltron talk 10:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not sure it will matter. You can't say the sky is blue without getting an argument about what shade it is.Dohhh22 (talk) 02:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter

edit

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter

edit

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 00:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter

edit

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey, good to see you back in town!

edit

How you been? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 22:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good. How about you? Just dropped in to take a look. I see people still feel the need to add their little tweaks. One of the books I requested while I was doing the research on this finally came in, so I may add a thing or two if it looks interesting. Dohhh22 (talk) 23:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you're looking for reading matter, I gave "the treatment" to Strangers on a Train (film) and Notorious (1946 film) in your absence. Hope you like. And yeah, the thumbprinters are still around; User:Clarityfiend let Notorious languish incomplete, disorganized and inaccurate for years until I started working on it, then jumped right in and reverted most of my edits to the Plot section. Some things never change. Anyway, good to "see" you. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 23:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter

edit

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Continental divide.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Continental divide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter

edit

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter

edit

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter

edit

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 21:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter

edit

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 22:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter

edit

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Conspiracy.ogg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The Conspiracy.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter

edit

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter

edit

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter

edit

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election

edit

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter

edit

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter

edit

The November 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter

edit

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter

edit

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

An RfC that you may be interested in...

edit

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Double Indemnity Gas Chamber.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Double Indemnity Gas Chamber.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Raymond Chandler sitting.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Raymond Chandler sitting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:RunningScaredSoundtrack.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:RunningScaredSoundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

edit
 
 

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

edit
 
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Atomic Shakespeare episode.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Atomic Shakespeare episode.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ColdOpen.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ColdOpen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ML Mark Harmon.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ML Mark Harmon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ml Dream Seq.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ml Dream Seq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

edit
 

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Sixteen Candles Soundtrack.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Sixteen Candles Soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Sixteen Candles#Soundtrack and songs. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

edit
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

edit
 

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

edit
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

edit
 

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list