Doctorx0079

Talk:Muhammad

I reversed Muuneeb's changes to the talkpage where he put (S.A.W.) behind Muhammad's name in everyone elses comments. Why did you revert that to a state where most of the instances were still in place? I have re-reverted to the situation before Muuneeb made his alterations. Jarkeld (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

You BOTH changed other user's comments. You changed Muuneeb's but then you added your own. Just click undo, don't make your own changes.Doctorx0079 (talk) 23:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

As his sole contribution was to add (S.A.W.) to other peoples comments and to the FAQ I simply reverted all his changes. Please look at the diffs before accusing me of refractoring someone else's comments. Jarkeld (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

It's ok. It was confusing me too. --mboverload@ 23:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for undoing your refractoring of comments by 75.179.144.10 and HaterofIgnorance. Jarkeld (talk) 23:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Using undo is helpful to avoid this kind of confusion. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey doc... I saw who Watt was later... I removed the post on the talk page as well shortly after detecting it.. Amartya ray2001 (talk) 23:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, got it. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

amatulic

That's what he wrote:

Please review Talk:Muhammad/Archive 23 where this is discussed in several sections. Basically this is a problem of terminology. In the context of "Islam" meaning "Mohammedism", Muhammad is the founder, because there was no religion called "Islam" prior to Muhammad. In the literal meaning of "Islam" being "submission to God", Muslims would want everyone to believe that Allah is the founder of Islam, which would basically push a religious point of view in the article.

Personally I'd have no objection to calling Muhammad the "prophet" of Islam rather than the "founder". But strictly speaking, in English usage, "founder" is technically correct.

Did you read it? Kavas (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Please answer my question do you think this is correct: In the context of "Islam" meaning "Mohammedism"? Kavas (talk) 00:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't really care that much. I don't pay attention to the article on Islam. In my opinion Islam is the religion of Muslims. The main book of Islam is the Quran. That's my view. I don't care that much where the Quran is supposed to come from. Muslims believe that the angel Gabriel told it to Muhammad, as far as I know. But I'm not an expert and I'm happy to leave that article to people who care more. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Good for you, happy editing. Kavas (talk) 00:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Joy DIvision

You can mention it at the Administrator's noticeboard (I forget the exact link). There's another page I think issues like this can be brought up. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Analogue Bubblebath 5

Hello. I am Tagging all of the notable aphex twin pages in search for someone to help me with the creation of "Analogue Bubblebath 5". If you are interested, Please notify me on my user:talk page. thank you. Conkern65 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC).

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Allies of World War II. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Eh, what? I deleted some junk that appeared to be vandalism. Guess I should have explained that in the edit summary. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

My apologies: you were right, I was wrong. Thanks for pointing out my mistake (but yep, you're right that you should have included something in the edit summary.) "This been a learning experience for both of us" (as people who have actually made mutually embarrassing mistakes say to each other to put a happy spin on things). --Shirt58 (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shichimi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sansho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kōichi Mashimo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• later that year. Mashimo is particularly fond of the French movie ''[[Les aventuriers (1967 film))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Diskono seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 00:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Definitely not a mistake. Perhaps I should be explicit about my reasons. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 11:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Raimais

Brother these entries actually translations from Japanese sources. As far as I remember two main sources are Japanese wikipedia page and this one : http://sansesoftcatalog.blogspot.com.tr/2014/05/blog-post_9055.html

Hope that helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamilz (talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 18:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Any idea about the dialog?? -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, I'm pretty sure I saw the dialogs between bad guy and Midori somewhere on the net as Japanese. I'll try to translate it this weekend. Gimme your e-mail this wiki talk thing is cumbersome. This is mine: wyaaron@hotmail.com. Regards. Kamilz (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Psycho (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Aaron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Get a life

I don't know why you care so much what is on another user's own talk page, but I suggest you get over yourself, and get a life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.69.183.97 (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Don't post nonsense on a shared IP talk page. You are sharing that page with everyone else at your school. Posting a bunch of nonsense on there makes it hard to read and wastes space. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 23:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Yep, deleted it again. Let's see if the baby reverts it. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 00:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

No need to delete that. Also, per WP:OWNTALK, you are not free to delete messages from other people's talk pages. If the nonsense makes it 'hard to read', so be it: let it serve as a record of the IP's activity and attitude. That's also only a shared IP, and may very well be a work or home IP. If he gets out of hand, blocks will be applied as needed. Dschslava ^Δx parlez moi 05:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

FYI

Regarding 2600:1:C6E1:BDC1:A87F:C0E0:E4D:CAC (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I just opened the thread WP:ANI#Drinkreader IP edits: time for a community ban? —C.Fred (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Interesting. I'll check it out. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 19:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Removed your comment as it was a reply to a user evading a ban

Hi, I removed your comment with this edit [1] hopefully you don't mind. I'm fairly certain the commentator is User:Drinkreader who is WP:community banned [2] and who's comments are therefore subject to reversion. As your comment was only a reference to their inappropriate use of the talk page, it's no longer useful if the original comment is removed. Nil Einne (talk) 07:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

BTW, since it seems you're active on cocktail related pages, I'd just like to let you know in case you don't already that you're perfectly entitled to remove any ban evasion from Drinkreader you come across. Nil Einne (talk) 08:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for Abortion

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for climate change

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)