edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Listen to the Band (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Nichols (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Thing

edit

Greetings. Unfortunately I do have a source for the dog at the end it is my own original research. I saw The Thing in its original theatrical release in '82 and saw it again a few days ago on Netflix. On the talk page there was a discussion of the issue [1]. I don't happen to agree with it. If I had to guess there were multiple cuts released in 1982. I've run into things like this before for other films. I saw Star Wars in previews in 1977 and the final theatrical release had slight differences. I'll look for a source for the dog.--Wlmg (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the clarification. Carpenter probably did have a few alternate endings. Here's the link to you youtube I questioned http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xu2cFljkPw. Go to 3 min 23 seconds and watch the alternate ending. The camera work seems amateurish compared to the rest of the film. It doesn't make sense that MacReady or Childs (assuming that one or both were Things) would revert to a dog then run into the tundra at the onset of winter. Maybe that's why it was cut? Anyway, if you find a source, that would be great. I would be interested to hear about the different versions.Docob5 (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Listen to the Band single.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Listen to the Band single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radioactive (Gene Simmons song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and KISS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chris Scruggs

edit
 

The article Chris Scruggs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of the article lacks notability with only trivial coverage. Fails to comply with WP:GNG and doesn't have sources that are verifiable and reliable and support his notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiAviator (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Heirs to the Dare

edit
 

The article Heirs to the Dare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2021

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Movies Of The Mind.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Movies Of The Mind.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply