User talk:Deppty/Archives/2022/May

CSD G5

Note that I've declined your CSD G5 nomination of Draft:Pradip Dave. In order for G5 to be applicable, the editor who created the article must be evading a block or ban at the time of creation. That's not the case with this particular draft as the master was not blocked (nor were any of their sock accounts) when the draft was created.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

CSD G1

Please stop misusing WP:G1. I've seen you do it now repeatedly, the most recent example being Draft:Harshal singh. The G1 description is very clear: it is intended for gibberish, not just language that is silly or nonsensical from a rational perspective. The good news is that most of the pages you tag as G1 should in fact be deleted, but not per G1. This particular example I deleted per WP:G11, which, honestly, should have been obvious to you.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Deppty (talk) 11:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Re Issue with Speedy Deletion

Hey man, May I know why you requested my new article for speedy deletion?? Dj121e121 (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Dj121e121, you didn’t create any article. Deppty (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm into draft mode currently and it says you have requested for deletion.... Dj121e121 (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Are you talking about the userpage? Draft articles are not suppose to be on your main user page. Deppty (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

WP:G11

Please note that just because a draft is about a company or product does not mean it qualifies for speedy deletion under G11. G11 is for "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". A draft like this about a company or product that merely asserts that it exists is not developed enough to be "unambiguous advertising or promotion." Now, it's worth keeping an eye on that draft, as it could easily become promotional - but it's not there yet. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Santa Maria Liberatrice al Foro Romano moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santa Maria Liberatrice al Foro Romano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 03:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mysquard123

I saw that you have filed a SPI case. But your case doesn't contain any evidence or clarification as to why you think Andy.roddic23 to be a sockpuppet of Mysquard123. Please do note that for SPI cases, evidence is the most important thing. Otherwise, on which grounds are you request for a checkuser to be done. Please read how to file a good SPI and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guide to filing cases. In each of them, one main thing has been asked for - evidence, which is not at all present in your SPI case. Please provide clear and concise evidence in the SPI report that you have filed, or it is likely to be declined for CU. Hope that I could explain the issue to you. Best, Itcouldbepossible^Talk 07:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santa Maria Liberatrice al Foro Romano (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Santa Maria Liberatrice al Foro Romano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Santa Maria Liberatrice al Foro Romano, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 13:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Deppty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 13:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Giuseppe Alberghini moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Giuseppe Alberghini, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 05:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)