Davidfreesefan23

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!

Hello, Davidfreesefan23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Malinaccier (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to December 21, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Penn State Nittany Lions football. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiffany Springs waterpark

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiffany Springs waterpark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 04:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, page unavailable listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oops, sorry, page unavailable. Since you had some involvement with the Oops, sorry, page unavailable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). NYKevin @878, i.e. 20:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, page unavailable listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oops, sorry, page unavailable. Since you had some involvement with the Oops, sorry, page unavailable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 16:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duke (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Nebraska–Lincoln, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, Davidfreesefan23. You have new messages at Robert4210's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tiderolls 19:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 12:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

• The edit wasn't a test edit. I was adding a bunch of hidden text in order to get administrators not to delete my article, which has been nominated for AfD. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Comment on content not the motives of other editors please. Please remove or strike your last comment Mtking ^(edits) 22:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Mtking ^(edits) 23:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coen brothers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ready (talk~~contributions) 18:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game

WHY WAS MY ARTICLE DELETED???????? :(((((((((((((((((((((((((( User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Guidance

Hello. I believe you could use a little help and guidance to help understand a few of wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the useful template, below, to follow links to specifics that may help you to make more constructive edits in the future. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at User talk:Ready and I will assist you as best I can. Many thanks. Ready (talk~~contributions) 18:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Davidfreesefan23, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ready (talk~~contributions) 18:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Kopyright

A tag has been placed on Kopyright, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Juan Oviedo, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 18:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Kansas City Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. — National Archives in Kansas City This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, Dominic McDevitt-Parks, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere: Wichita Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — Central Riverside Park Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge! St. Louis Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — Forest Park Visitors' Center Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dooors

The article Dooors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of sources, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mifter (talk) 00:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 100 Floors

The article 100 Floors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of sources, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mifter (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 100 Floors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 100 Floors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CyanGardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 01:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sblounskched!

The article Sblounskched! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Sblounskched

A tag has been placed on Sblounskched, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baja Grill

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Baja Grill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - MrX 04:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is NOT a blog

Wikipedia is NOT a blog nor a place for your opinions. The following is NOT allowed on Wikipedia. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 02:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

• http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=University_of_Kansas&diff=539578002&oldid=537965770

Speedy deletion nomination of Kardashian (unit)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kardashian (unit), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association

Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Couch burning

Hello, Davidfreesefan23,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Couch burning should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Couch burning .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Steve9821 (talk) 03:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Looking at your edit history, it looks like you'd been editing productively for a while, but then you made this edit today to North Carolina State University. Since it's one-off, I'm not taking any action, but please, no opinions or personal accounts in articles. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of streets in Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulaski Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Repetition, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kofe Khauz may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melborp

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Melborp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Tentinator  22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miami Heat, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Dionne quintuplets. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. do not re-add the contested category without gaining consensus on the talk page. Your inability to provide a reliable source is indicative that your opinion does not carry enough weight to be included in the article. WP:BRD requires you to prove on the talk page that your edit should be in place. Just putting it back is considered edit warring and can lead to your being blocked from editing. noq (talk) 08:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dionne quintuplets, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A random blog is not a reliable source. As stated previously you need reliable sources and to gain consensus on the articles talk page - not just reverting and shouting in the edit summaries. As this is your final warning, if you again revert without gaining consensus you are very likely to be blocked from editing until you decide to play by the rules. noq (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Haplology because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barry Bonds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for persistent disruptive editing. Some of your edits are the sort of things which might, coming from a new user, be innocent mistakes due to lack of understanding of Wikipedia, but you are way beyond that stage. Some of your edits seem to be infantile "jokes", but, whatever may or may not be acceptable in talk pages or Wikipeida-space pages, joke edits of publicly visible articles are unacceptable. However, even if we make the maximum possible allowance for those two categories of disruptive edits, we are still left with a significant number of edits which are simply unadulterated vandalism, such as this, this, and many more. The length of the block, 1 week, is a compromise. It takes into account the fact that you have not been blocked before, but also the fact that you have received far more than enough warnings, including a "final" warning in February 2012. You should have been blocked after that, and if you continue in the same way you are likely to be blocked for far longer, perhaps indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davidfreesefan23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have made plenty of constructive edits and plan to make more when my block ends. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 03:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request does not address or even acknowledge the reason for your block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Purdon't, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MU Student Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Student union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR!, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
• It is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipizza

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipizza, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Southwest Swim Club has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

From your unblock request during the time when you were blocked in the past, it seems that you are of the opinion that making a number of constructive edits somehow makes it acceptable to also make vandalism edits. That is a view which is not generally shared by the Wikipedia community, and certainly not one that I share. I see that since that block you have continued to intersperse vandalism and "joke" edits among other, more constructive edits, and also that you still continue to create unsuitable articles, despite the numerous deletions and messages about doing so. You have therefore been blocked again, this time for three months. That is a large jump up from the length of the last block, but, as explained in your last block notice, it takes into account the fact that you have been receiving messages about your disruptive editing for a long time (since December 2010), and it also takes into account the fact that you were warned that any more vandalism would be likely to lead to a much longer block. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Structured Query Language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give SQL a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

• Well, here's what I wanted to ask you, Andy. I tried to do a conventional move in order to "swap" the two pages, but Wikipedia wouldn't allow me to for some reason. I was blocked for three months for vandalism earlier on, but my block expired on 19 December 2013 and I haven't been re-blocked (or even received a warning) for nearly a month since then. Could you get someone to please explain what's been going on with the page (or offer one yourself if you're an admin?) In any case, whenever we get to the bottom of this, just have whatever authority on the matter leave a message on my talk page. Thank you very much, User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, I'm not trying to block anyone, I used the warning template in the hope that its links would point you at relevant explanations.

There are two issues here: should it be moved?, how to move it? I would suggest that both of these are better addressed at talk:SQL.

Should it be moved? No and not yet. No, because of WP:COMMONNAME. Not yet, because making a substantial rename like this to a high-traffic page should always be discussed beforehand and only carried out with solid consensus behind it. In this case, I'd be amazed if such a consensus could be achieved.

How to move it requires the page to be moved by an admin. There are tags to request this. What we can't do is to copy-paste move it, as you did here, because that loses the page's edit history and copyright attribution trail. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointers. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Boundary of London

Hello, Davidfreesefan23,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Boundary of London should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundary of London .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Northern England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Carlisle, Scarborough, Sunderland, Salford and Lancaster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you as you are clearly not here to help build an encyclopedia. -- John Reaves 01:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davidfreesefan23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please tell me what I did wrong after my second block. Point out a few examples to tell me that your block is justified. Many of my edits have been reverted, but I received NO vandalism warnings on my talk page ever since the second block (as opposed to a whole bunch before). Most of my edits, at least to me, seemed to be of a non-vandal or otherwise good-faith nature, even if they didn't necessarily belong. This block is shocking, and frankly, I consider it a travesty. I had thought about "retiring" earlier (in a fit of angry rage displayed in the edit summary), but now I've calmed down and I'm willing to give this another shot, if the admins are ever to do likewise. If anything, you could at least look over my contributions for the last month. If you compare them to all the stuff before the second block, the contributions seem to be less disruptive, even if not all of them are exactly helpful. If you don't unblock me, at least I would like you to explain your reasoning for the block. That would make me feel much better.

Decline reason:

Reasons for the block, if I were the one considering whether to block you or not: This, this and this. None of them in any way productive edits. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Flamestinguisher listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flamestinguisher. Since you had some involvement with the Flamestinguisher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. noq (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City

Hello! I would like to invite you to a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Break Time logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Break Time logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Break Time (convenience store) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Break Time (convenience store) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break Time (convenience store) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fences&Windows 14:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)