Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:List of Puerto Rico hurricanes (2000–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Tropical Storm Danielle (2016). Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I accidentally did that, I have fixed it back. Cuises123 (talk) 07:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

No you didn't! Please do not make false claims like that! Your contributions do not lie! Jalen Folf (talk) 07:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I realized after many days that I actually added a null edit, and thought I reverted my deletion, sorry for the problem Cuises123 (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian on Florida

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian on Florida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page created sever weeks ago with only an infobox

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drdpw (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

IP Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cuises123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.160.93.250. Also, around the same time this IP got blocked, my main google account got compromised, so, I believe that it was believed as an open proxy because someone with another IP got in mine, so I hope you (the reviewer) understand. Cuises123 (talk) 03:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as, since your account is not directly blocked, I can't unblock and you could edit from other IPs. Yes, the IP is blocked as a proxy. Instead of trying to argue our way around that, let's have you go down to WP:IPECPROXY and follow those instructions to request IP block exemption. (Also, your Google account has nothing to do with this ... for privacy reasons we don't allow people to use Google to log in). — Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

edit

  It appears that you copied or moved text from 2014–15 Australian region cyclone season to Cyclone Olwyn. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I did give attribution in the draft (See: [here]). Do I still need to give attribution after adding to mainspace? Cuises123 (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it's still needed because right now the draft is not connected to the mainspace article. The point of providing attribution is to make it clear where the text originated, so that me (or any other reader) could look at the history of Cyclone Olwyn and be able to tell that the text was written by other people, not just you. So the easiest thing to do is to add the attribution in the edit summary when you copy it over. Alternatively, you could have used WP:RM/TR or a similar venue to request that the draft (with your original attribution) be directly moved into mainspace over the redirect, which would have worked as well.
All that being said, I appreciate that you did attempt to add the attribution when you created the draft. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Draft copying

edit

I have noticed that you have recently copied text from my "Not resubmitted" drafts. Please do not copy the text and move it into the mainspace; those drafts need to be expanded and instead of doing that, perhaps you could expand the drafts. (I have seen what you did at Chebi's article). Songda Talas 09:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok I am sorry, I just wanted to quickly add more pages to wikipedia, I won't do it again. Cuises123 (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok. If you want to help me, you can start with:
I will later after finishing my current drafts (will not take too long). Cuises123 (talk) 05:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
ok Songda Talas 05:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Joe Clark (Murderer)

edit

  Hello, Cuises123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joe Clark (Murderer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Joe Clark (Murderer)

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Joe Clark (Murderer), was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Cuises123. Thank you for your work on List of Puerto Rico hurricanes (2000–present). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ulysses Storm

edit

  Hello, Cuises123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulysses Storm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

2024 Afghanistan-Pakistan floods

edit

I have seen that you created 2024 Afghanistan-Pakistan floods. You are a new contributor, ok, but this still seems to have been done in great haste, without care. You did not look how prior (identical) pages have been written, named and constructed. I think you should go through article submission in the future. It is much harder to fix a pot that hasnt been thrown right, rather than crafting it ok in the first place. Wuerzele (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply