Cooler88

October 2011

Hello Cooler88 and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Do not create multiple accounts for the purpose of taunting other users. TNXMan 19:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

The reason for the removal of the two maps used for the article Climate of Spain

The reason for the removal of the two maps used for the article Climate of Spain: Climas de España.png map is not according to the Spanish meteorogical service and Climates of Spain.png map is inaccurate, because it ignores details. The first map should not be used at all because it totally ignores the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification and the second map although done according to the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification, needs to be redrawn by taking the more detailed climate data of Spain into account, rather than the world map.

The Spanish State Meteorological Agency Agencia Estatal de Meteorología and Portuguese Meteorological Institute Instituto de Meteorologia together have prepared and released an extensive climatological atlas about the climate of the Iberian peninsula. On page 18 of this climate atlas is a detailed map of the Iberian peninsula which was prepared according Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification about the climate types of this peninsula. The climate map(s) of Spain (and indeed the climate map of Europe) must be redrawn by taking this map as a source.

http://www.aemet.es/documentos/es/divulgacion/publicaciones/Atlas-climatologico/Atlas.pdf

Currently blocked user Saguamundi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.104.144.27 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

http://www.schweizerbart.de/resources/downloads/paper_free/55034.pdf

BTW, both maps are avaible.

Not currently blocked user. --Cooler88 (talk) 21:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cooler88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been "identified" as a Van de Kemp's sock. It is an error. Van de Kemp is a Turkish sock (still "alive" as Noraton), while I'm not turkish at all. If you look at my contribs, you will see that I've never started any edit-war or vandalism. And why is Saguamundi, one of his socks, not definitively blocked ?

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. TNXMan 20:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Cooler88 (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cooler88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The administrator has not answered my questions. The check user had mistaken : I can't be Turkish, because I'm French (Van de Kemp is a Turkish one as Menikure-Saguamundi-Maphobbyist...). Thus, I have never started any edit war or vandalism. And why is the Saguamundi sock (and his "brother" Noraton) still able to edit ?

Decline reason:

Checkusers use everything from Operating System, Browser, IP address, and behaviour. Besides, any unblock request with WP:NOTTHEM in them are going to be pretty much summarily declined (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cooler88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In which language must I say it ? I'm not Turkish ! Van de Kemp is ! Your system has problems...

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sock. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.