Work with people, not against them

edit

Please do not threaten other editors with blocks, especially if they are an administrator. It's a threat that you can't follow through on so it is meaningless and disruptive to other editors. I realize that editing on Wikipedia can be frustrating but you'll succeed more when you work with people, in cooperation, rather than threatening people. Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pretty Rhythm

edit

I'm notifying you that I undid your move from Pretty Rhythm: Aurora Dream to "Pretty Rhythm (TV series)" especially since you did not state a rationale in your edit summary. There are four Pretty Rhythm television series in total and all sources for the first one explicitly call it Pretty Rhythm: Aurora Dream. lullabying (talk) 18:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you separate Pretty Rhythm: Dear My Future?CuteDolphin712 (talk) 01:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you have enough sources, that's fine. But as of now, there currently are no enough sources to give its separate article. It's fine under the Sequels section where it is, as it explicitly shows that it is a sequel and keeps its own name. Pretty Rhythm: Dear My Future also redirects to that section. lullabying (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Second, why you separated all Pretty Rhythm series to individual pages (I don't know about King of Prism) CuteDolphin712 (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Each of them have separate stories and deserve separate articles, and the original article was getting too long. Pretty Rhythm was also changed to focus on the franchise and original games. Also, Pretty Rhythm: Rainbow Live follows an entirely separate story with little connection to the previous stories and therefore doesn't share the same plot, so it wouldn't make sense to have it on the same page as Pretty Rhythm: Aurora Dream. A good example to look at is Futari wa Pretty Cure, where there is no separate article for Max Heart despite having a new title. lullabying (talk) 11:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I guess you can say the same thing as the first 3 PreCure series (Futari wa Pretty Cure, Max Heart, Splash Star). If you look on some anime pages, a lot do not have independent articles for its sequel series. See below for example:

CuteDolphin712 (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of programs broadcast by Seoul Broadcasting System, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I used template:ill, which you reverted for no reason. The guidelines: Help:Interlanguage_links - Inline links.

If a red link is not appropriate locally for whatever reason, such as because the subject does not appear to be notable or because you are unable to supply an English translation of the title, then linking a page in another language may be useful.

The red link informs readers that the page does not exist locally, thus inviting its creation, and avoiding directing readers to a page that many of them will not understand. The disadvantage is that it conceals the existence of the foreign-language page, which might in itself be of interest to some readers, and may also be valuable to anyone wishing to create a corresponding English Wikipedia article. That is why template:ill is added. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 10:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

As The Banner said, "this is the English language Wikipedia. Not much people can read Korean here, so linking to Korean-language articles is useless." Can you do it yourself instead? CuteDolphin712 (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Banner said it, but it doesn't mean it is correct. We are currently discussing this. So, if you see any guidelines saying not to use Template:ill, please provide them. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Saki Yamakita

edit

Hi CuteDolphin712, If you want to create an article on this person, create in draft (WP:AFC) where it can be reviewed. At the moment, there is insufficient references to support a mainspace BLP article on this person. This article was reviewed as part of the WP:NPP process, so please do not revert it. It is a common pattern in NPP to see folk writing over redirect but to do that they must well-sourced or they are reverted per policy. scope_creepTalk 12:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • I found enough of her single notability outside I Ris, such as films. Acting IS outside their secondary activities besides being part of the group. User:Lullabying said that secondary sources are Oricon and Natalie. I think the group was made just for the anime, similar to Kirapika for example. See their talk page with "Un-did" section.CuteDolphin712 (talk) 13:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Blessing of the Sea

edit

Hello, CuteDolphin712,

Thank you for creating Blessing of the Sea.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this new article, but I recommend adding more sources to support the claims that have already been made, and adding material from any professional reviews or other media coverage the show may have received.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Desert Village Mobile Home Park, Arizona" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Desert Village Mobile Home Park, Arizona. Since you had some involvement with the Desert Village Mobile Home Park, Arizona redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Frood (talk) 23:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good luck

edit

"Complete Single Collection" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Complete Single Collection. Since you had some involvement with the Complete Single Collection redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Eimi Naruse

edit

I've courtesy-informed you because of this edit - the ping template doesn't work in edit summaries despite User:Lullabying attempting to use it there. ミラP 20:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sakura Gakuin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • This is to be more consistent with other group pages, such as Cute (Japanese idol group)#Members. We do not list them anymore, so that's why I removed them. Birthday of former members must never ever be listed. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • I don't think it was a necessarily bad change, myself, though I could understand why some regular readers and editors of that particular article might see it as a bad one. When you say "we", do you mean there was a consensus for a style change at an idol-related Wikiproject or the like? (Since it was reverted, maybe it'd be worth getting article-specific consensus on the article talk page? Though it might have gotten reverted because the edit summary was "removing all content" instead of something descriptive that doesn't sound like an autosummary for a vandalism edit? IDK.) - Purplewowies (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Editor's Barnstar
For pruning a reasonable amount of plot summary in List of School Rumble episodes ミラP 04:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. lullabying (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niji-iro Prism Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Lee Yeol-eum concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lee Yeol-eum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lee Yeol-eum

edit
 

Hello, CuteDolphin712. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lee Yeol-eum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, CuteDolphin712

Thank you for creating Philippe Goffin.

User:Majavah, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Majavah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Majavah (t/c) 18:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Creating redirects

edit

Hey, could you stop creating redirects for articles I planned to draft? I noticed you created Ensemble Stars! discography right after you looked at my page. I don't understand why you're doing this, because it kind of feels like you're trying to compete against me for article creations. I have no problems if you're creating the article yourself but please don't just create redirects for something specific I listed on my work page. lullabying (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Uh, I'm not competing against you. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Then please stop creating redirects on articles I planned to draft. Like I said, I have no problem if you were going to make these articles on your own but the fact that you made the redirect right after commenting on my talk page shows that you made redirects based on my work page and it comes off as competition. lullabying (talk) 16:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ojamajo characters

edit

On what basis are you removing half of the content? Fancruft? Also, i do think Nozomi is worth including since she's shown to be an ojamajo. Though, i guess so would Fami. Rctgamer3 (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fancruft CuteDolphin712 (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mei Yamazaki

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mei Yamazaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Abdotorg (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Age 12, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tsuri Bit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Saki Yamakita

edit

  Hello, CuteDolphin712. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saki Yamakita, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Template:Football squad start

edit

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 139#Fs start - template update question. GiantSnowman 10:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of Hug(tto)! Pre(tty )Cure episodes

edit

Hi, can you explain how both Hug! Pretty Cure and Hugtto! PreCure are "the fifteenth television anime series in Izumi Todo and Bandai's Pretty Cure franchise, produced by Asahi Broadcasting Corporation and Bandai and animated by Toei Animation", according to List of Hugtto! PreCure episodes and List of Hug! Pretty Cure episodes? --bdijkstra (talk) 02:58, 16 January 2022

Hello!

edit

Hi~ I just want to say I want to appreciate your editing efforts, especially around Aikatsu-related and Pretty Series-related topics (including Pripara ofc) You can call me Nyan, im a huge fan of these series but I always refrain from editing the article about them myself mostly because Im not experienced on fiction-related articles. I mostly edit on history articles, administrative divisions, and cities. It makes me happy to realize that there are several editors that are familiar or know about them, considering the fanbase themselves are small and seems nonexistant most of the time. Nice to meet you~

That's all I have to say. Again, thanks and happy editing! Nyanardsan (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

IP Address

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clariniie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 118.137.204.65; it suddenly got blocked. However, there is no block log on my contributions page. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are correct that there is no block on your account, so I can't unblock anything. You are also correct about the IP being blocked. I can't unblock that either, at least not just like that. What I can do is tell you to a) edit from a different device, a different range in the short term and b) in the longer term, go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. You have done enough productive editing that I think you'd get it without much checking. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Acqua Lete moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Acqua Lete, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:32, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Yūka Morishima" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yūka Morishima and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26#Yūka Morishima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Acqua Lete

edit
 

Hello, CuteDolphin712. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Acqua Lete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, CuteDolphin712. Thank you for your work on Milan Majerský. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marian Jurečka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rokytnice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

IP Address (2)

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clariniie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 31.4.242.52. It's the second time I've been blocked this way. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please follow the guidance you were given the first time. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CS1 error on Jan Chvojka

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jan Chvojka, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard Heger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page For the People.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I noticed at the page's edit summary, thank you for notification. I've been trying to reformat references so mistakes may happen. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Alena Schillerová

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Alena Schillerová, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removal of redlink in Jiří Havlíček article

edit

Hi! You removed a red link from the Jiří Havlíček article, with the comment "Page does not exist". Red links are actually a deliberate feature of Wikipedia, intended to encourage the creation of new articles, and should not be removed just because the target article does not exist. For more information, please see WP:REDLINK. — The Anome (talk) 08:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

edit

  Hi CuteDolphin712! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2024 Slovak presidential election that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Manticore 01:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah, sorry! I don't know why this sometimes happens with my edits, and am aware of that. Thank you for noticing! CuteDolphin712 (talk) 11:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recent AfD nominations

edit

Hello! You must have noticed that I regularly participate in Czech Republic-related AfD debates. Please, be aware that debating nominations takes away time and energy that could be invested elsewhere. For example Jaroslav Kopřiva took me an hour. Quite a lot of your recent nominations have been unsuccessful – out of your last ten nominations, only two ended as 'delete' (redirect), six of them were 'keep' and two ongoing ones are also close to 'keep'. Your last nomination of Pavel Šulc almost felt like trolling to me, and even you yourself admit that you don't follow Czech football. Many articles need to be reworked, not deleted. It would be better to improve the quality of nominations instead of the quantity. Thanks. FromCzech (talk) 11:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, sorry if I do not talk well too much. I also have been working hard on football-related articles recently, especially players with international career at senior level. I am aware of this, and I do not believe in disturbing other users in any silliness. I completely agree with the fact that all we can do with articles like you mentioned are improving them. In further case, I will try to be even more aware with the status of such articles and improve them. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Jan Kliment

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jan Kliment, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pak Chol-jin

edit

Hey, not sure what happened with your signature there, but please have a look at the dates. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I already updated my signature. Clara A. Djalim (talk) 11:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removing archive URLs from references with live URLs

edit

Hi CuteDolphin712! I noticed on this edit you made on the article "Robert Fico" that you removed the archive URLs of references that had live URLs with the edit summary "These sources still exist!" In general, it is "suggested" that references add an archive URL to status when the URL status is live per "Template:Cite web". When this is done, the "url-status" parameter can be set to indicate whether the original URL is "live" or "dead". I went ahead and reverted your edit (but was sure to restore the fix you made per WP:CURLY). Thanks! 11:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, but I find it unnecessary to add archive dates in live URL whereas we usually do so in dead ones, that's why I removed them. Clara A. Djalim (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Editor's Barnstar
For good work at sportspeople AfDs Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radosław Sikorski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Ďurica (July 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Clariniie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Politics of Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Democratic Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bellingham's debut

edit

Hello. To clarify, I don't think it was actually necessary to add the BBC ref in the first place. Although the Sky ref doesn't use the actual word "debut", it's clear from the wording "Bellingham's introduction to become the third-youngest player after Theo Walcott and Wayne Rooney to play for England - aged 17 years and 136 days" that it was his debut. Had he played before, he would have become the third-youngest (or maybe second-youngest or even youngest) at a younger age. However, it did no harm.

I moved it because the BBC ref doesn't verify him replacing Mount after 73 minutes. Probably placing it after the comma in the first sentence, before the mention of Mount, would have been preferable to having both refs after the second sentence. But as it stood, and stands again since you restored it, the second half of the first sentence isn't verified by the BBC ref. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

There was no source after the sentence: He made his debut in a friendly match against the Republic of Ireland at Wembley on 12 November, replacing Mason Mount after 73 minutes of a 3–0 win. that's why I restored it. You may revert my last restoration again, but should we use this reference repeated from Sky Sports below following the sentence: At 17 years, 136 days, he became England's thirdyoungest full international; only Theo Walcott and Wayne Rooney had appeared at a younger age. ? (<ref name="SkySports2020"/>) or just leave it per before my first edit.
⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 10:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
We're not obliged to have a source after each sentence, so long as all the intervening content is covered by the next source(s), which it was. However, WP:TSI does advise keeping citations close to the content cited, to avoid the risk of breaking text-source integrity if content gets rearranged or expanded. The BBC ref does explicitly state its being his debut, so I'd leave it in, placed after the first comma. Don't think there's much danger of any content being added between the two sentences, so there's no real need to repeat the Sky ref, but it does no harm. So:
He made his debut in a friendly match against the Republic of Ireland at Wembley on 12 November,<BBC ref> replacing Mason Mount after 73 minutes of a 3–0 win.<Sky ref> At 17 years, 136 days, he became England's third-youngest full international; only Theo Walcott and Wayne Rooney had appeared at a younger age.<Sky ref>
Hope this is OK with you. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
That looks fine. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 15:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Trout

edit
 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

The Kip (contribs) 20:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Non-attributed translations

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from cs:Vít Šimral to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Vít Šimral

edit

Hello Clariniie, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vít Šimral, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vít Šimral.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit
  Saw your user page and had to go through your instagram profile. I must say, you are such a beautiful lady. Have a lovely day ahead. Gabriel (……?) 00:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I love that cookie. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I know you will. cheers. Gabriel (……?) 11:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Marek Střeštík

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Marek Střeštík, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cabinet of Petr Fiala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Non-attributed translations

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from cs:Eva Decroix to Eva Decroix. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I just don't know how to add ContentTranslation to tags. I'd be fine to add the wiki markup statement on edit summary, though. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Andrej Segeč

edit

Umm, I don't see anything to do with football, so unsure why you included it in the football delete queue. Govvy (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I changed it to Olympics, but doesn't work. Can anyone please help me? ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quotation marks

edit

Hello – I noticed you have been changing single quotation marks to regular quotation marks within quotes and citation titles. This is not correct per MOS:QINQ and Template:Cite web: For titles containing quotation marks, convert regular quotation marks (") to single quotation marks ('). Please keep this in mind with your future edits. Thanks. Random86 (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! On "I Got You" page, I noticed such mistakes like the titles capitalized against MOS:ALLCAPS (e.g. Twice instead of TWICE). The Oricon reference is written in Japanese per page title, that's why I changed from title=Oricon Top 50 Combined Singles: 2024-02-19 to script-title=ja:週間 合算シングルランキング. The latter makes sense so people won't believe the source is written in, say, English... for English Wikipedia. For the quotation marks, I've always thought they should be written in regular quotation marks, but want to make sure they are not curly. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 15:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox/lead images

edit

Hello. Noticed you removed the infobox image from Oscar Dertycia with the edit summary Regarding lead image... Unless the person is deceased, it's silly to provide the photograph of a 22-year-old young adult in the lead of the biography for a 59-year-old middle-aged. The infobox documentation takes quite the opposite view: A picture of the player, ideally on the pitch in the strip of their most recent team (or the team the player is most well known for, in the case of retirees). The rationale is that the reader of an encyclopedia article expects to see what the subject looked like when doing what made them notable, in this case playing football (or at least dressed for playing football). I'll restore it. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't know that. For retired ones, does that mean we should put an image of that person in their playing days even if they're still alive? Otherwise, my guess is just the fact that no editor has wanted to take a more recent picture of the footballer to their Wikipedia article yet. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
It does mean that. Thing is, we're writing an article about a sportsperson for an encyclopedia. The person became notable because of their sporting career, the infobox is about their sporting career, and the image (where possible) ought to be relevant to their sporting career.
It's different if the sportsperson had a notable career in later life; then we'd need to make a choice as to what aspect of their career to favour. Same applies to people in other walks of life. Jimmy Carter's infobox image shows him as president rather than as centenarian, George Weah's shows him as president rather than footballer.
For most footballers, we're lucky to have a free image relevant to their career at all... Some 15 years ago I took a photo of Alex Govan, who played football in the 1950s. I didn't put it in the infobox at the time, because it seemed daft to me, having a picture of an elderly man wrapped up in scarf and overcoat illustrating an article about a speedy winger. It's in there now, because we haven't yet got anything better, but it still looks wrong.
Please feel free to seek other opinions. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Václav Klaus Jr.

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Václav Klaus Jr., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Adam Ďurica

edit

  Hello, Clariniie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adam Ďurica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Václav Černý (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willem II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nice to meet you; have some images

edit

Nice to meet you on Talk:Karolína Huvarová - in appreciation, I found/made some free licensed images for your articles. I do that occasionally.

I also added a couple of images to your articles that were already on Commons. (So I guess I found them on Commons. But I didn't upload these unlike the previous ones; not quite as much work.)

I hope you like them. --GRuban (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Sorry for being offline yesterday, because... I was away. By the way, are those images free? ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Romanization of Korean

edit

I just noticed this change: [1] We have guidance on how to romanize the names of Korean people, see WP:KOREANNAME. I'll have to revert a lot of these edits to align it with WP:KOREANNAME; please don't make ad-hoc romanizations like this. seefooddiet (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

On A Love So Beautiful (South Korean TV series) article, are characters' Romanized names based on official website? I didn't know that it should be Romanized per WP:KOREANNAME, but since this is an English Wikipedia, would there mispronunciation? For example: English speakers may pronounce i in "Sol-i" like the letter instead of ee as in seen). You also may notice on Blue Birthday article that Sin U was changed to Shin Woo for the same reason.
What are some examples for number 2? If the person's preferred English name or Latin spelling is known, use that.
⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think official website spellings would count under number 2; I may reword 2 to account for fictional characters. Preferrably should put official website ref next to the spellings to indicate that the spellings are verified.
If official website spellings are not known, then unfortunately "Sin U" and "Sol-i" are what we prefer. We default to these spellings because they're more consistent than ad-hoc spellings, which can be irreversible (impossible to derive original Hangul term from the romanization). Furthermore, different Wikipedians may write different ad-hoc spellings; this results in multiple spellings being attached to a single person, often within the same article. This issue to be relatively common; I've fixed several hundred articles to avoid that problem.
Romanizing Korean is a bit of a nightmare; spent the last 6 months or so immersed in it. Current procedure is a result of the immersion. seefooddiet (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply