ChaoticTexan
Welcome!
editHello, ChaoticTexan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Christianity in Indonesia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for participating in the Texas wikiproject by helping fix articles. TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 21:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks! ChaoticTexan (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your cooperation in editing Texas articles. TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 21:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC) |
Requesting copy edit support
editHi,
Season's greetings
I am looking for proactive copy edit support/input help any of the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.
Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Muslim Women
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Bookku: Hello! I would be glad to help, although I work primarily on mobile which is very inconvenient for editing. I am not able to access similar tools as PC. I always have to revert edits manually because of this.
- I appreciate you contacting me, although I am unable to proactively assist you, I can drop by every now and then and assist. I wish you the best of luck! ChaoticTexan (talk) 04:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind attention :) and many greetings
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christianity in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex has been accepted
editCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Wikipedia and copyright
editHello ChaoticTexan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Christianity in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
@Dianna: My apologies, thank you for the information! ChaoticTexan (talk) 19:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Technical Request
editNot done I have sent your technical request to be discussed at Talk:Synagogue_architecture#Requested_move_14_August_2020. Thank you. Kadzi (talk) 10:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! ChaoticTexan (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Editor's Barnstar | |
I commend you for the Christianity in the DFW Metroplex article. Your contributions are greatly appreciated, and trust me, that have not gone unnoticed! Keep up the wonderful work!!! TheLionHasSeen (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from University of al-Qarawiyyin into Education in Islam. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information! ChaoticTexan (talk) 00:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
== Welcome! ==
Hi ChaoticTexan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is certainly related to the conflict between Palestine and Israel. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info! I was a bit confused on how to request an edit as I was trying to follow the rules. Hence the talk page edit rather than trying to edit the article itself. I noticed that I currently have 503 edits and my account is 5 years old. Is there something else I must do to be able to edit such articles or write in the talk pages? I tried two different talk page requests which both got deleted. One was about the synthesizing of material for tying Peleset, Phillistine, and other historical names as being equated to Palestine. As I noticed the main reference point was the British interpretation of certain terms into Palestine. The other was about renaming the State of Israel to Israel to match the wikipage, and Palestine to the "State of Palestine" as is the title on that wikipage. Thanks once again for the help! ChaoticTexan (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
editYour edit to National myth has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, could you please explain to me how to avoid this in the future? Even if someone is properly given attribution via citation, and even if the statement says that "According to X," what could I do to properly include the information without running into copyright issues? I read the Wikipedia article on copyright and the only thing I can suspect is that linktree possibly links to other material that is copyrighted, or that the source itself uses other copyrighted marerial? I would appreciate if you could clarify. ChaoticTexan (talk) 21:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Replied on my talk page. — Diannaa (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, could you please explain to me how to avoid this in the future? Even if someone is properly given attribution via citation, and even if the statement says that "According to X," what could I do to properly include the information without running into copyright issues? I read the Wikipedia article on copyright and the only thing I can suspect is that linktree possibly links to other material that is copyrighted, or that the source itself uses other copyrighted marerial? I would appreciate if you could clarify. ChaoticTexan (talk) 21:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)