Chaddy

Image:AcdcAngusYoung.jpg now on Wiki Commons

File:AcdcAngusyoung.jpg

Image:AcdcAngusYoung.jpg

Hi there!

I uploaded AcdcAngusYoung.jpg on Wikimedia Commons, but it is named AcdcAngusyoung.jpg, and my commons name is ACDCDude718. It is now okay to upload the image on German Wiki. (Note: I don't know much German.) Ac-dcfreak785 07:19 22 May 2006.

Ok, thank you! -- Chaddy2 ?! 16:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Lodgeparade.JPG

In answer to your questions, yes, and yes. --Helenalex 20:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

All right. Chaddy 13:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Force India logo.jpg

No, that one is as big as they have released, I think. Any larger and you risk running foul of the Fair Use police, as the resolution would be too high to justify using under US law. How German law handles this, I'm not sure. Sorry about that. Pyrope 14:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Under German law, a high resolution version wouldn´t be a problem, because this logo is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain. But ok, if there isn´t any bigger version, I´ll take this one. Chaddy (talk) 22:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Images

WTF are you doing in deleting images, I have posted copy right links.... FFS are you some f***g ignoramus or what...

All images have copy right issued on them.. all of them...

Croatian MOD agreed to use all its images on wiki... Are you taking a piss or being a real cunt or try to vandalize articles... You must be some Serb or something, that could explain the thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mic of orion (talk • contribs)

Watch your language please.

"To use all its images on wiki" is incompatible with the GFDL. We accept only images that are completely free. So it must be allowed to use the images for every purpose not only on wiki. If you don´t know what is allowed or not then let help you but don´t upload unfree images. Chaddy (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Look images are free, Croatian MOD owned images are free, and are free to be used on wiki, do not tag images, if you have questions ask me, and I'll try to help otherwise I get angry bc I have to re-upload the same images... and you seem to have gone only for my images... Of course I am angry, perhaps I used wrong tagging, happens, I use standard licensing, you are free to ask me and correct me if I used wrong tagging...

License - Croatian MOD permission to use MOD's images on wiki. - read... [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mic of orion (talk • contribs)

I told you, it´s not enough when Croatian MOD only gives permission to use the images on wiki. They must be completely free so that they can be used everywhere.

You don´t have to reupload the same images. You even must not reupload them because they are not compatible with Wikipedia:Copyrights.

And by the way, your link doesn´t help me because I don´t understand this language. Chaddy (talk) 03:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, than you ask, images are free, that is what the MOD says, they are free to be used on Wiki... and you should not remove images, also everyone has rights to edit wiki, everyone, and if you delete the images I'll just upload them again, and if you have issues with that, tough, MOD gave permission to use the images, if you have problem with that, not my problem, MOD issues license for the use of images, you don't like it, I can always talk to the owners of wiki and let them adjudicate, but if you going to make mess of wiki articles bc you are to ignorant and can't understand English or don't know about licensing it is not my problem, BTW you ought ot understand what rules apply to the images, and if I used wrong license you should point this out, btw, application of proper licensing is what is needed with each image, you make wiki rules yet you have no clue about wiki rules on image licensing.

U can use any image, ANY, as long the owner agrees to the use of the image, and proper licensing needs to be applied, image does not need to be free to be used on Wiki, you need to use proper licensing tags that is all. I am not sure how you became editor on Wiki, not knowing that, but than you are just a kid, what do you expect from a child.

You did such mess in a workplace, say where I work, or in publishing, you'd be out of work for ever, no one would hire incompetent workers, as this is what you are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mic of orion (talk • contribs)

Ok, EOD. A further discussion with you is useless. Chaddy (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Benutzer:Chaddy/Editcounter

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Axmann8 (Talk) 22:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I've moved this page to User:Chaddy/Editcounter. Happy editing. MuffledThud (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry mates, that´s not my day... :( And thank you MuffledThud! Chaddy (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Korean War Memorial Picture Transfer

I sent this message to User:Jastrow and he sent me here:

I know that the transfer of Korean War Memorial pictures from the US to Germany Wikipedia page happened a while ago, but I just found out about it. Can you please explain to me how German Freedom of Panorama applies to pictures taken in the United States under U.S. law? I would understand if they were being used as fair use images, but they are being used in a gallery and are licensed as free images: DE:Diskussion:Korean War Veterans Memorial.

So my question is the same for you.--Jorfer (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

According to the Schutzlandprinzip (approx. “principle of national protection” - I don´t know why there is no article about this in English Wikipedia) every works from countries that signed the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works are treated as if they were from the mentioned country. E. g. in Germany US works are treated as German works and hence protected under German law (and the other way round). This applies also in all other countries that signed the Berne Convention.

The key article for this is art. 5 of the Berne Convention:

“(1) Authors shall enjoy, in respect of works for which they are protected under this Convention, in countries of the Union other than the country of origin, the rights which their respective laws do now or may hereafter grant to their nationals, as well as the rights specially granted by this Convention.”

“(2) The enjoyment and the exercise of these rights shall not be subject to any formality; such enjoyment and such exercise shall be independent of the existence of protection in the country of origin of the work. Consequently, apart from the provisions of this Convention, the extent of protection, as well as the means of redress afforded to the author to protect his rights, shall be governed exclusively by the laws of the country where protection is claimed.”

Chaddy (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Very interesting, but there are two problems:

• First, what evidence is there that the photos transferred were taken by German Nationals? I believe most if not all of them had English text originally, so the evidence would be against it (e.g. DE:Datei:US Korean War Memorial 5.jpg where User:Kubina appears to be an American citizen.)
• Second, what evidence is there that the rights allotted in the treaty to German Nationals usurp those granted to an American National over derivatives? From a U.S. Law perspective, Freedom of Panorama in regard to artworks is not the right of the photographer over their own work as it may be in Germany, but a deprivation of the rights of the original artist. Since, their is no consensus in "the Union" on whether Freedom of Panorama in regards to artworks is the photographer's right, the U.S. legal definition as a deprivation of another author's right would apply, and thus would make these provisions not apply. This is different from a copyright length, for example, where "the Union" would all define it as an author's right regardless of how long they feel it should be for.--Jorfer (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

That's irrelevant. The cited article does not only apply to Germans but to all citizens of these countries. If my link to Schutzlandprinzip has confused you: I have only linked to the German article because there is no one about this topic here in English Wikipedia (at least I did not found anyone...). But that topic is part of the Berne Convention and applies to all member countries.

And that's why we can use Central European law (German/Austrian/Swiss law) for all files hosted in German Wikipedia. Thus in German Wikipedia freedom of panorama also applies to the images of the Korean War Veterans Memorial.

By the way, in Central Europe there is no such principle of law as "fair use". So we can't use fair use in German Wikipedia (but anyway that's unnecessary in this case). Chaddy (talk) 21:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

OK, my mistake; I misread "their" in the first clause as referring to "authors" rather than "countries of the Union other than the country of origin". A pronoun reference can change everything. This conversation has not been in vain, however. In researching answers to this I found out that the Wikipedia Foundation classifies Freedom of Panorama photos taken in countries where the image would be non-free as non-free images and requires a fair use rationale in addition to the free license of the photo (see File:Atomium 20-08-07.jpg). Based on the wording "Wikipedia Foundation", this should mean it applies equally to the German Wikipedia. This also includes all the requirements in WP:NFCC, which means while the images are properly licensed in Germany, they do not meet Wikipedia guidelines for contextual significance, low resolution, etc. .--Jorfer (talk) 00:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Where did you find this guideline relating to freedom of panorama? Only with that image of the Atomium? That's English Wikipedia, they follow US and British law as I think. And at least in the States there is no freedom of panorama any longer (there was but it has been abolished). Thus fair use is needed to proberly use images of the Atomium.

On Commons it's similar (but there fair use is not accepted). There applies US law and the law of the country of origin (which varies from image to image of course). Thus freedom of panorama is not possible there.

In German Wikipedia applies Central European law as I have already said. Thus there we can use images of the Atomium or the Korean War Veterans Memorial without fair use.

By the way, in German Wikipedia we can't use many other files because we don't have fair use. So every legal system has it's advantages and disadvantages. ;) Chaddy (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It requires a fair use rationale in America for these pictures (even though it is not; they use the same template in this case, I am sure, because it is easier), but maybe they would have to make a special "non-free in location country rationale" template in the case of Germany for this. The United States has Freedom of Panorama in regards to buildings and before 1990 buildings couldn't even be copyrighted in the United States (see Commons:Freedom of Panorama#United States; great, we both learned something out of this). The US has no Freedom of Panorama with regards to artistic works. I was referring to this template: {{Non-free architectural work}}.

--Jorfer (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Millencolin

Your claim that "Millencolin is a very typical example for this genre" (melodic hardcore) is entirely your own point of view. The genre is not mentioned anywhere in the article, nor are any sources cited to support it. If you can cite reliable sources that describe Millencolin as a melodic hardcore act, then you can add content to the article using those sources. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Request for Help, please

Greetings Chaddy ,

Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate these passages into the awesome Austro-Bavarian language? please.

Content

"Dass wir den Heiligen Geist empfangen, wie er sich in der Zungenrede offenbart, ist Gewähr dafür, dass wir das Himmelreich erben."

"Die Wassertaufe ist das Sakrament, dass dem Erlass der Sünden und damit der Erneuerung dient. Die Taufe muß im natürlichen, lebendigen Wasser, also etwa in einem Fluß, im Meer oder in einer Quelle stattfinden. Der Taufende, der bereits selbst die Taufe mit dem Wasser und dem Heiligen Geist empfangen hat, führt die Taufe im Namen des Herrn Jesus Christus aus. Und die Person, die die Taufe empfängt, muss im Wasser vollständig untergetaucht werden mit gebeugtem Kopf und dem Gesicht nach unten."

"Das Sakrament der Fußwaschung ermöglicht es einem, Anteil am Herrn Jesus zu haben. Er dient auch als ständige Mahnung daran, dass man Liebe, Heiligkeit, Demut, Verzeihung und Dienstbereitschft üben sollte. Jede Person, die die Wassertaufe empfangen hat, muss seine bzw. ihre Füße im Namen Jesu Christi waschen lassen. Gegenseitige Fußreinigung kann praktiziert werden, wenn dies angemessen ist."

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 01:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll have to prewarn you. There is no "standard Bavarian" but there are many different regional variantions. I'm from the border area to the Franconian and the Swabian language area. Thus "my" Bavarian has many influences from these two dialects...

Anyhow I'll try to help you and to keep out those impacts of foreign dialects. ;)

"Dass mia an Heilign Geischt empfangan, wia er si in da Zungaredn offenbart, is Gwahr dafia, dass mia des Himmlreich erbn."

"D'Wossataufn is des Skrament, des dem Erlass vo de Sindn und domit der Erneierung deant. D'Taufn muaß im natirlichn, lebendign Wossa, oiso etwa in oam Fluß, im Meer oda in oana Quelln stattfindn. Da Taufende, der scho seiba d'Taufn mitm Wossa und dem Heilign Geischt empfangan hod, fihrt d'Taufn im Nama vom Herrn Jesus Christus aus. Und dia Person, dia d'Taufn empfangt, muaß im Wossa vuistendig untertaucht werdn mit gebeigtm Kobf und dem Gsicht nach untn."

"Des Sakrament vo da Fuaßwaschung ermeglicht es oam, Anteil am Herrn Jesus zu hom. Er deant o ois ständige Mahnung do dro, dass ma Liabe, Heiligkeit, Demut, Vazeiung und Deanstbereitschaft übm soit. A jede Person, dia d'Wossataufn empfangan hod, muaß sei bzw. ihre Fiaß im Nama vo Jesus Christus waschn lassn. Gegnseitige Fuaßreinigung ko praktiziert werdn, wenn des ogmessn is."

Chaddy (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Gratitude

Thankyou so much Chaddy for your Outstanding translation effort!

I very very Grateful.

May God Bless you!

(If you want your favorite article(s) to be translated into the Chinese language, then I would be glad help you.)

Yours Sincerely, --Jose77 (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

No matter, I'm helping willingly. ;)

And thanks for your translation offer. But a whole article is much more work than simply nine sentences... :) Chaddy (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Request for Help 2

Greetings Chaddy,

Could you kindly help me translate these passages into the brilliant Austro-Bavarian language? please.

Content

"Jesus Christus ist das fleischgewordene Wort, er ist gestorben am Kreuz für die Vergebung der Sünder, auferstanden am dritten Tag und aufgestiegen in den Himmel. Er ist der einzige Erlöser der Menschheit, der Schöpfer des Himmels und der Erde und der einzige Wahre Gott."

"Die heilige Bibel, bestehend aus den Alten und Neuen Testament, von Gott inspiriert, ist die einzige niedergeschriebene Wahrheit und das Maß für ein christliches Leben."

"Die Erlösung wird durch die Gnade Gottes und durch den Glauben geschenkt. Gläubige müssen dem Heiligen Geist vertrauen, wenn sie nach einem heiligen Leben streben, Gott ehren und die Menschlichkeit lieben ".

"Die Wiederkunft Christi wird am Jüngsten Tag stattfinden, wenn Er vom Himmel hinabsteigt, um die Welt zu richten: Die Gerechten werden das ewige Leben empfangen, während die Bösen auf ewig verdammt werden."

Your help would be Appreciated with Full Gratitude, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 01:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Here your are!

"Jesus Christus is des fleischgwordene Wort, er is gstorbn am Kreiz fia d'Vagebung vo de Sinda, auferstandn am drittn Dog und aufgstiegn in Himml. Er is da oanzige Erlesa vo da Menschheit, da Schepfa vom Himml und vo da Erdn und da oanzige Wahre Gott."

"D'heilige Bibl, dia ausm Oitn und dem Neia Testament besteht, vo Gott inspiriert, is d'oanzige niedergschribene Wahrheit und des Maß fia a christlichs Lebn."

"D'Erlesung wird durch d'Gnadn Gottes und durch den Glaubn gschenkt. Gleibige meassn am Heilign Geischt vertraun, wenn se nach oam heilign Lebn strebn, Gott ehrn und d'Menschheit liabn."

"D'Wiederkunft Christi werd am Jüngschtn Dog stattfindn, wenn Er vom Himml hinobsteigt, um d'Welt zu richtn: D'Gerechtn werdn des ewige Lebn empfangn, während d'Besn auf ewig verdammt werdn."

Chaddy (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou so much Chaddy for your superb translation effort!

May you prosper and succeed in life! --Jose77 (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar Award

		The Original Barnstar
		For your many months of service to Wikipedia, I, Jose77, hereby award you this barnstar. --Joseph, 21:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

--Jose77 (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, many thanks! :) Chaddy (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chaddy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chaddy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chaddy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yomi Scintu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)