User talk:Caeciliusinhorto/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating CIL 4.5296.

User:Cwmhiraeth while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for Brothers Poem, "about a poem by the ancient Greek poet Sappho, discovered in 2014. It is the most recently-discovered of Sappho's poems, one of the best-preserved, and generated considerable excitement when it was first published both in academia and in the press."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Caeciliusinhorto, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@*Treker: Thank you, and best wishes to you too! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 14:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theresa Goell

The article Theresa Goell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theresa Goell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Great work!

Great work with your expansion of Theoris of Lemnos, which I started. Thanks! Prioryman (talk) 08:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 13:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision to my own role

Hi. I have revised my own role at Wikipedia:WikiProject History. I have added a note at the talk page to reflect this. Just wanted to let you know. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Caecilius?

Just happened to notice your username for the first time. If you're at all familiar with Caecilius, either Lucius Caecilius Iucundus or Caecilius of Calacte, then the forces of rationality could use another voice at User talk:Charlie292929. It's probably just trolling, or at the least, the angriest bit of misunderstanding ever, and it's hardly worth the effort to waste time on, but still, anyone familiar with Caecilius is scarce enough. Thanks, Andy Dingley (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@Andy Dingley: Oh, gosh, that looks like a mess. Yes, my name is a reference to L. Caecilius Iucundus, or at least his fictionalised self. I've not heard of Caecilius of Calacte, but he's pretty clearly a different person – I will see if I can add another voice of rationality to the mix... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for all your excellent editing on women in antiquity! We'd love you to become more involved in the Women's Classical Committee on Wikipedia, if you would like; you would be very welcome. But in any case, thank you!!!

Srsval (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Srsval! I do watch WP:WMCC, but my impression of it is that it is mainly focused on women classicists, whereas I mainly edit around women in antiquity (with a few exceptions more up WMCC's alley). But if I find myself editing on women classicists, I will definitely remember to make a note on the WMCC page. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

:D With WP:WMCC, we do all sorts of women, and we'd love to diversify more so feel free to join us! We'll be editing together remotely on 22 January, 13.00-15.00 (GMT) if you're around; follow #WCCWiki on Twitter. Or feel free to get involved with the WP:WMCC project page. Srsval (talk) 15:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poetry of Sappho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eustathius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Request help with new Council for WikiProjects

Hi. I am trying to create a forum where various WIkiProjects can exchange ideas and information about their best ideas, efforts, methods, and accomplishments. I am the Lead Coordinator at WikiProject History. I tried to create an active exchange at WikiProject Council, but did not get very far when I tried to do so.

I would like to get some interested editors together who might be interested in helping with this idea, either with getting WikiProject Council moving again, or creating a whole new WikiProject to do so.

You can sign up to help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editors Forum/Members. Right now, this page is a redirect to a draft in my user space; we will move it to the project space as soon as we have ten people signed up.

eventually, the goal would be to have a few people from a wide variety of WikiProjects and varioous topical areas, working together at WIkiProject Council, to help us create a forum and an exchange for ideas and information.

Would you be interested in helping with this? Please let me know. If you wish, you can simply comment on my talk page to let me know any comments or thoughts on this. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theoris of Lemnos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Theoris of Lemnos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Erinna

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Erinna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ma nam is geoffrey -- Ma nam is geoffrey (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theoris of Lemnos

The article Theoris of Lemnos you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Theoris of Lemnos for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Erinna

The article Erinna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Erinna for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ma nam is geoffrey -- Ma nam is geoffrey (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Theoris of Lemnos

The article Theoris of Lemnos you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theoris of Lemnos for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Theoris of Lemnos

The article cites "Parker 2005" but no such work is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Thanks, Renata (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Renata3: Good spot, thanks! I haven't been on wikipedia recently, but I've just noticed this and chased down the citation Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

need reference work for the "Classics" article

Hi- In your edit here, the Dyson 1993 reference was added to the footnotes, but there is no work cited. I've not been able to figure out where the citation is coming from. Would you be able to look into it? Thanks! Funandtrvl (talk) 01:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I believe I found the reference here, thanks Funandtrvl (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@Funandtrvl: I've checked my notes, and that is the correct reference. Thanks for fixing this! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Funandtrvl - fixing ping Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Terrific, thanks! Funandtrvl (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed Women in Green Editathon

Hello Caeciliusinhorto -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Coinissuer

I've taken Coinissuer to wp:ANI.--Ermenrich (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ermenrich: ugh, I was hoping that they would engage productively on the talkpage, but so much for that. What a clusterfuck. Thanks for letting me know – I'll have a look over there Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure they're probably either the original person who added the section or else just really into this weird synth interpretation, likely for ideological/religious reasons. He's also speaking disparagingly of an admin for some reason. Some people just can't be reasoned with.--Ermenrich (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Stuff like this actually strikes me as quite possibly being Vandalism, especially if you follow they link they provided (which does not support the form of the name they've added): [1]. The other weird name form "Pphsappho" is cited to the Attic Kalpis painting of Sappho by the Sappho Painter (c. 510 BCE), currently held in the National Museum, Warsaw ([2]). Looks like fake referencing to me.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

They're right that the Sappho painter's kalpis does indeed spell her name like that, but they aren't right that this demonstrates that it is the standard attic spelling: there are four classical attic vases which have her name inscribed, and at least three different spellings (yet more WP:OR, I note!). I've reverted that particular change. (In fact I think all of their edits to Sappho are at best pointless, and I'm sure it's a complete coincidence that after almost a year of editing pretty much only on the subject of Phanes, they've branched out into my most-edited article (with one attempt at reverting me on the topic of Sappho on another article, incidentally restoring text which contradicted the cited source)... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I take that back. Their rendering was "Πφσαπφώ", but the Sappho painter's is the rather more economical "Φσαφω"; they have a couple of extra π for no apparent reason. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Might be worth mentioning your suspicions as to why they suddenly started editing Sappho at ANI.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Hi,

Shifting comment from User talk:Caeciliusinhorto-public, sincere apologies if you have already gone through this and happens to be repetitive in that case feel free to ignore.

I am Bookku. I do promote content expansion in topics having information gaps. Requesting your visit to Draft:Sexual politics, Draft:Women, conflict and conflict zones and help content expansion if you find the topic interested in.

It seems you focus mainly on women in the ancient Greek. I have worked on Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları an article focusing on non-elite common women slavery in ottoman times. I know it is not ancient enough, one Greek Wikipedian has helped out with Greek sources, but you seem to be a good reader and by chance you are having any more sources you may help the article with inputs.

Last but not least I am looking for inputs to know how far an article on topic Draft:Female slavery in Al-Andalus would be feasible.

Looking forward to your inputs

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 02:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Bookku. I've had a look, and I'm afraid it's all a bit modern for me! If I'm active when you're ready to move Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları into mainspace drop me a note and I'll do a bit of a copyedit if that would be helpful, though Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Sally Hemings fix

Thanks for the fix! I'm not entirely familiar with categories creation (I've done some but not a whole lot), so thanks for catching my mistake! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome! The relevant guideline is hidden away in WP:Subcat:

Category chains formed by parent–child relationships should never form closed loops; that is, no category should be contained as a subcategory of one of its own subcategories.

I was surprised at how much we have on Hemings! Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

• I didn't realize myself until I made an article on a novel about her and Jefferson, honestly. There's more out there but it's more descendants - those would typically be covered by the overall family category, right? I'm using Jefferson's categories as a bit of a guideline as far as what I should have or add it to. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sulpicia (satirist)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sulpicia (satirist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sulpicia (satirist)

The article Sulpicia (satirist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sulpicia (satirist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crispus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zosimus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Caeciliusinhorto, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 11:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

So...

...who was that? Drmies (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

• Found it: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tounom/Archive. Drmies (talk) 01:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Well, that was a hell of a watchlist to find this morning! Thank you, Drmies, for spotting it so promptly!
  • Good to know that they have graduated from V, OR and NPOV problems to straight-up vandalism. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Your GA nomination of Philinna Papyrus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philinna Papyrus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 20:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philinna Papyrus

The article Philinna Papyrus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Philinna Papyrus for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CIL 4.5296

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CIL 4.5296 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eritha -- Eritha (talk) 09:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Salve

Salve Caeciliusinhorto! Just wanted to let you know that your username made me snort coffee all over my laptop. Very funny. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Salve! Glad I could provide some entertainment! Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your username made me laugh as well, I remember Caecilius from my Latin classes in high school. Optime! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Olive Morris

Thanks for the helpful comments at the peer review for Olive Morris. I wanted you to know I have now closed the review and submitted the article to FAC. Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@Mujinga: You're welcome! It's been a while since I did an FA review, but I may drop by there and have another look over the article. (And if you want the opportunity to be picky about one of my articles, I've [shameless plug] put Corinna up for a pre-FAC peer review here...) Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 14:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Kottabos

Dear Friend,

thank you for your edit. But you did not give me time to create a dp, and a further page on the journal. So I will continue, and reverse your edit. Many greetings, --Dick Bos (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

@Dick Bos: even if you create a page for the journal, a simple search for "kottabos" demonstrates that the game is the clear primary topic; even googling kottabos "journal" gets me results about the game rather than the journal! Per WP:ONEOTHER, in such cases there is no need for a disambiguation page. At any rate, there is no need to disambiguate Kottabos until any ambiguous article exists, so at the very least you need to create Kottabos (journal) before you start moving Kottabos around. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 10:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Internet Archive Scholar vs. JSTOR

Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70 % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

@Nemo bis: I vaguely knew that IA Scholar existed, but I have never used it. Trying it out quickly looking for sources for an article on my to-do list, I find that I get somewhat worse results than Google Scholar - more irrelevant results, more outdated articles, and several microfilm scans of articles where you don't get told the article title or author in the search results, which is rather less helpful than the metadata given on g!scholar. On the other hand, I do get some good results on the first page which don't come up on the first page of g!scholar's results, so I'd certainly consider it as a supplement. Based on the (single!) search I have tried so far, though, it isn't ready to replace g!Scholar as my first port of call yet. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for trying. I see where you're coming from: Google Scholar has a very comprehensive index and its full text searches tend to be quite good most of the time. I often use it as first stop, but sometimes when I'm looking for something very specific it's infuriatingly hard to make it do what I want, for instance if you ask for two exact search terms it may return results containing only one and you have to go through a bunch of irrelevant results. Maybe it's just me though! Nemo 21:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll definitely have to spend a bit more time with the IA scholar search and see how it works in other situations – when I've tested it more thoroughly I might have more thoughts! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Wicked GA nom

Just reminding you that the GA nomination for Wicked is still open. Last week, you had discussed doing a more thorough review within the next day and nothing since. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Natalie Clifford Barney Featured article review

I have nominated Natalie Clifford Barney for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alice Kober

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alice Kober you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 22:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

GA for Wicked!

Thanks for all your help on this article. I await the appearance of my little green plus sign! How long does that take? Hasn't shown up yet... Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

@Just Another Cringy Username: the bot is supposed to run every 20 minutes; I don't know whether I messed something up or it is just behaving weirdly, but I've asked for advice at WT:GAN#Wicked (Maguire novel) Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Washington Square

Last night, I looked up Henry James' Washington Square and saw it needs a LOT of work. Thought it might be up your alley. I've only read the book once and I'm more familiar w/ the film. Take a look and LMK. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You're right that it doesn't look great. I'm afraid I know almost nothing about Henry James, and have never even heard of Washington Square, though, so I'm in no position to help! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philinna Papyrus

The article Philinna Papyrus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Philinna Papyrus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Article endorsed by subject

Since finishing Wicked, I've been working on other related articles, including the one for Gregory Maguire himself. In the process, I discovered that the bio page of Maguire's own website points to his Wikipedia article! I made a new talk page section admonishing future editors to be mindful of this, but could that also make his article a candidate for protection? I feel like we have something of a responsibility now. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 04:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't have any experience with page protection, but my understanding is that we don't protect articles preemptively - there needs to be an active problem to justify it. I wouldn't expect the fact that Maguire links to it on his website is sufficient to justify it - but for a definitive answer, you'd have to ask an admin. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 12:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

I've submitted it for a Class B evaluation. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

CLODO review

@Caeciliusinhorto:, I've been on hiatus for the last few months due to a mix of school and stress. I've returned now and seek to finally finish my work on the CLODO article. Would you be free to give it a second pass? (ping me if you want a full GA review opened, its really up to you). It appears I misinterpreted 2 of the sources and it messed up a good chuck of the article.

On a different note, going forward with GA reviews, can you please give the reviewee an opportunity to respond before failing a page (the concerns raised in the first review only required about 2-3 hours to correct). This is merely a suggestion however, I know it is not required and I disappeared for a few months anyway. The image concern may require elaboration since it appears to be a 'copy-left' release. I may do some more clean-up but the page has been substantially improved. Thank you for reviewing the page the first time, you caught a some major (and frankly, very obvious in hindsight) errors that the pre-review and myself had missed. Cheers Etriusus 03:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Etriusus: I'm busy at the moment, so I'm not about to give it a full review right now, but if nobody has taken up the GA review by next month I will try to find time to look at it. I've glanced over it and given it a quick copyedit in the meantime. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CIL 4.5296

The article CIL 4.5296 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CIL 4.5296 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eritha -- Eritha (talk) 19:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Nadezhda Alliluyeva at FAC

I wanted to let you know that I've nominated Nadezhda Alliluyeva for FAC. As you had participated in the Peer Review, I wanted to see if you'd like to give it a second review at this time, and if so any comments would be much appreciated. Kaiser matias (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Green - July GA Editathon

Hi Caeciliusinhorto -- just touching base about the July WiG editathon, which is now open to signups. The 20-minute article assessments (or "mini-reviews") are intended to help less experienced editors avoid quick-fail scenarios with their GA nominations. When replying to an assessment request, all you need to focus on is whether an article has any major issues remaining that might pose problems (you're not required to do a full in-depth article review!). If you like, you can add the assessment requests page to your watchlist for convenience, but you can also respond to requests via the main July editathon event page. Let me know if you have any questions -- you can of course also sign up as a regular editathon participant. Thanks for your help! Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Alanna! I have watchlisted the requests page :)

I probably won't nominate anything for a GA during the editathon due to a combination of out-of-wikipedia commitments and my wikipedian projects at the moment not being super GA-focused, but I will consider signing up. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alice Kober

The article Alice Kober you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alice Kober for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alice Kober

The article Alice Kober you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alice Kober for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your spelling and citation corrections on some articles I rewrote. Sometimes the details get missed and it's good to know someone is catching them. Ifly6 (talk) 16:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ifly6: No worries – I know how easy it is to miss a detail here or there! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Discuss disputed image:Battle of kedah.jpg

 I invite you to please join the discussion at the nomination page.

Notice

The file File:Battle of kedah.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of several problems found about it.

I asked you to discuss it because I see that you have a concern about the factuality of the information presented on the page Chola Navy. Surijeal (talk) 05:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Corinna

Congratulations, Caeciliusinhorto! The article you nominated, Corinna, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon

Hello Caeciliusinhorto:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Username :)

I like the reference to Caecilius est in horto. I started a novel about Caecilius. I may finish it some day. Btw thank you for your input. I seem to have unintentionally wandered into a nest of vipers ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mogh Roith (talk) 00:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Sappho's music

I hope you don't feel that my addition blindsided you. I have been an admirer of your work on the article for a while and was excited to add to it. Does the content seem okay to you? Aza24 (talk) 03:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Corrina scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 2 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

November songs

Thank you today for the article, introduced: Corinna is, after Sappho, the ancient Greek woman poet with the most surviving fragments, so we know almost nothing about her, rather than absolutely nothing. Three fairly substantial fragments of her poetry survive, and her works preserve versions of Greek myths not otherwise attested. Despite this, the main scholarly interest in Corinna over the past century has been the surprisingly contentious debate about when she actually lived – despite this being the one fact about her life which is unanimously agreed upon by the ancient sources! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Nazi monuments in Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nazi monuments in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nazi monuments in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦Україні🇺🇦Героям🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦(talk)🇺🇦 20:32, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phryne

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phryne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phryne

The article Phryne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Phryne for comments about the article, and Talk:Phryne/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anyte of Tegea

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anyte of Tegea you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anyte of Tegea

The article Anyte of Tegea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anyte of Tegea for comments about the article, and Talk:Anyte of Tegea/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1800, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coronis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Telesilla

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Telesilla you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Urve -- Urve (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cities founded by Alexander the Great/archive1

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of cities founded by Alexander the Great/archive1. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC).

Why are you deleting Witches Reel page? It's fine!

I am not sure who you are, at all, but please leave my page alone. The Witches Reel is an excellent dance that we do every night at Scottish ceilidhs. Thank you. Iain 82.69.27.177 (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

It may very well be an excellent dance (in fact, it may very well be several excellent dances: I found at least three different dances under the name "Witches Reel"), but there are many excellent dances which do not have and do not need wikipedia articles. I have nominated it for deletion for the reasons explained in the nomination. If you think that the dance is notable and the article should be kept, the best thing for you to do would be to find evidence of in-depth coverage of it in reliable secondary sources, and make an argument in the AfD discussion that it meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Signups open for The Core Contest

The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Penhallow Hotel fire

Nice work, thank you. You may notice similar problems at all the articles edited by User:Classic Middlesex (e.g. Colin Campbell & Steve Wright) and the various associated sockpuppet accounts. Just an editor to be aware of.... 10mmsocket (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

@10mmsocket: Hah, yes, I am aware of BarehamOliver/ClassicMiddlesex, and trawling through their contribs looking for easy fixes is exactly how I found this article! There's plenty of crap to be cleared out of wikipedia's coverage of recent crime, and at least in the UK BO/CM is responsible for way too much of it... Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 11:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I think there's some serious COI with the crime author that they keep pushing - in fact I might go so far as to say his is them! 10mmsocket (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Caeciliusinhorto! Your work on Diocletian has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Telesilla

The article Telesilla you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Telesilla for comments about the article, and Talk:Telesilla/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Urve -- Urve (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

FAR for Henry Moore

I have nominated Henry Moore for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Unsolved murders

Why did you remove Plomo Mummy and Momia Juanita from the list and claim that they are not unsolved murders? Clearly they were murdered and it is not known who did so. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: It's not at all clear that either was murdered. Both were apparently victims of human sacrifice. State-sanctioned killings are not usually considered murders. Neither article describes the killing as a murder. The sources cited in the List of unsolved murders article didn't describe them as murders.

As for "unsolved": it is unsolved only in the sense that we don't know the names of the people who killed them. It's not a mystery: we know that it was a state organised ritual carried out by priests. We know who in general carried out the killing, how, and why. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification

Hello Caeciliusinhorto:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)