Blueshiftofdeath

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gia Woods has been accepted

Gia Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

• Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siena Liggins has been accepted

Siena Liggins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reyna (musical group) has been accepted

Reyna (musical group), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JSFarman (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Xana (musician)

Hello, Blueshiftofdeath,

Thank you for creating Xana (musician).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Xana_(musician)#

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sagotreespirit}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 22:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hannah Jadagu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hannah Jadagu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hannah Jadagu

Hello, Blueshiftofdeath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hannah Jadagu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Jadagu (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FeralOink was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannah Jadagu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FeralOink (talk) 11:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Blueshiftofdeath! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FeralOink (talk) 11:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Berber languages

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions on Berber languages.

These articles aren't in great shape unfortunately and they may need to be rewritten. It would be amazing to bring some of them to WP:GA or even WP:FA. If that's something you want to do, I would be happy to help, although I don't know much about these languages.

Best, a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Antoine,

I'm legitimately thrilled to hear this!! It's pretty surprising to me how little attention these pages seem to get. I have no background in Berber languages / Berber studies in general either, and haven't found it to be much of an issue so far, other than the amount of reading I have to get through to rewrite a section. It's still been very slow going for multiple reasons, and it doesn't seem like anyone else is actively adding to them (information, sources, etc.), so having another person on the case would be amazing.

I'm waiting until we resolve the current population dispute to continue editing the main Berber languages page (I want to rewrite the Subclassification section next, then put the sections in a more standard order, then go through and do a general passover/edit). There were two other pages I left some discussion on, that I'd love to hear your input for:

- The Tifinagh/Libyco-Berber script pages are oddly named and divided; I mention this in the Libyco-Berber talk page. I'd love to get your input on that, and overall I think those two pages definitely need to be reorganized and overhauled.

- If you have a linguistics background, I have some confusion regarding Zenaga phonology (mentioned in the talk page).

Also, all the individual language pages definitely could be updated; most of these pages have uncontested Ethnologue citations from over 2 decades ago for the population, so I was planning on updating them to the Ethnologue 2022 numbers. Since I think you mentioned having access to the latest Ethnologue edition, updating those would already be a huge improvement.

Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you get started; I do have a bunch of reading material that's been very helpful (and interesting!), if that's something you'd like me to share. And of course let me know if you have suggestions for what could be improved. (I also have a growing list of my own, which I'm also happy to share if it's ever of interest.)

Thanks for reaching out about this! :-) Blueshiftofdeath (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

It's not only Berber languages: articles about languages in general are of poor quality. You can look at "major" languages and see that they're often not in better shape.

I think you would benefit from an access to Ethnologue, I recommend joining their Contributor program to enjoy a free access.

I improved Levantine Arabic from a terrible article in June 2021 to Featured article. It was a long process. I'm happy to help on the process, to provide peer review on any article you want and participate in discussions (feel free to ping me), but I won't contribute to the core content. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Sounds good! Should I ping you on your talk page, or directly on the article talk page? And should I additionally ping your about the Libyco-Berber and Zenaga Phonology discussions, or should I consider you already pinged for those? Blueshiftofdeath (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Whatever you prefer. I'm not that interested in phonology but feel free to ping me and if I don't answer, consider that I'm not interested in the discussion ;) a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Awesome! :-) Thanks again!! And thank you also for letting me know about the Ethnologue Contributor program, I will definitely get on that. Blueshiftofdeath (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Alex the Astronaut

Hi Blueshiftofdeath

As someone close to Alex, I'm just jumping in to correct a few of your additions to the Alex the Astronaut Wikipedia page. Alex uses she/they pronouns - her bio on her website may use "they" however it isn't evidence in itself that Alex uses exclusively they/them pronouns. Please see her Instagram bio if you want confirmation.

Additionally, Alex does not identify as non-binary. She is on a journey and currently has not reached a definitive spot on that journey to identify or not identify as one label or the other. That's exactly what the article you linked reiterates as well.

Please correct these when possible, and thanks for your contributions regardless! 60.242.18.158 (talk) 06:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! I can see upon rereading how I misinterpreted the article. I also see you made the changes in question yourself, which is great! As you probably have already figured out, "reliable" sources are basically the most important thing on Wikipedia; since I couldn't see any information on pronouns on Alex's general Instagram page, I changed the source for Alex's pronouns to be a specific post.

Just so you know, nobody owns any given Wikipedia page. Alex's page doesn't seem to be getting much traffic, so it may not change very often, but eventually people will probably change the page to reflect their understanding of whatever press is out there about Alex. Since the content of Wikipedia pages is based basically entirely on the content of reliable sources, rather than primary sources (including the person herself in a biographical page), if Alex doesn't want her page to say she's nonbinary, the best way to ensure that would be to specify that in an interview somewhere, as I believe most people (including myself) would typically automatically categorize anyone that explicitly says they use gender neutral pronouns as nonbinary. Blueshiftofdeath (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Jadagu has been accepted

Hannah Jadagu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Indoor fishing

Hello, Blueshiftofdeath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indoor fishing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Indoor fishing

Hello, Blueshiftofdeath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indoor fishing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indoor fishing has been accepted

Indoor fishing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

She was ^afairy 05:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

New article Douiret language

Hi Blueshiftofdeath! Yesterday, Fdom5997 created the article Douiret language based on a dissertation that covers a few Tunisian Berber dialects. I have found some additional mentions of this inland variety, but it's hard to bring these varieties into the big picture of the easternmost Zenati varieties, especially since the whole treatment of Tunisian Berber in Ethnologue is a big mess (see User_talk:Austronesier#New_language_page). Maybe you can help out here with some additional literature that I'm not aware of. Austronesier (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

I took a look and unfortunately couldn't find anything either... I will keep an eye out though as I go through sources for related pages! Blueshiftofdeath (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)