Bildersindtoll
July 2024
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 - WP:INFOBOXFLAG says: "Situations where flag icons may be used in infoboxes include: Representing the nationality of participants in sporting events where this practice is otherwise common, such as at the FIFA World Cup or Olympic Games" Bildersindtoll (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems you don't understand, let's take an example: Template:Infobox international football competition or 2022 FIFA World Cup. Flag icons should only be inserted in infoboxes in those cases where they convey information in addition to the text, such as the country the team represents or the nationality of players. The country field (host country) already states the country name so a flag icon is unnecessary. Annh07 (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 I quoted from the guideline and it says that the icons can be used, for example, at the FIFA World Cup or the Olympics. The Icons should not be used in the info boxes in particular if too many flags would appear there and this could lead to confusion. This is not the case. So I still see no official reason why the icons should not be used. Bildersindtoll (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- In general, your edits goes against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I encourage you to post your question at the Tea House. Annh07 (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 Rather than questioning the accuracy of my edits in principle, you should provide specific guideline points that justify your reverts. Bildersindtoll (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Since you don't understand MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and what I explained, I encourage you to go to the Tea House. If you continue to make edits based on your views, they will also be reverted by others because there is no consensus, for example here: [1], [2]. Annh07 (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 So you are not able to name a specific point within the guideline that justifies your reverts. Instead, you refer to the guideline in general. Not a good style and wrong. Bildersindtoll (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- The reason I reverted your edit is because it does not comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. If you have questions about policies, please post a question at the Tea House, not here. Annh07 (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 I certainly don't have any questions. You can't just revert by referring to a guideline in general terms. You have to name the specific point within the guideline and you obviously can't do that. Bildersindtoll (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I explained above but it seems you don't understand so I recommend you go to the Tea House to get more specific help, so let's end the discussion here. Annh07 (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 As I said before, you can't name a specific point in the guideline that justifies your reverts. It is not enough to refer to a guideline in general and you know that. You're obviously interpreting the rules as you see fit and that's not a good style. Bildersindtoll (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your edits are clearly not WP:MOS compliant and Annh has explained above but you still don't understand. If you've read MOS:FLAG, MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and don't understand, then post a question at the Tea house or Help desk, where the community will explain it to you. 14.242.0.2 (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh an “anonymous user” who also can't name a single concrete point in the guideline. This is ridiculous and once again illustrates what I said. Go out and touch some grass. Bildersindtoll (talk) 10:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your edits are clearly not WP:MOS compliant and Annh has explained above but you still don't understand. If you've read MOS:FLAG, MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and don't understand, then post a question at the Tea house or Help desk, where the community will explain it to you. 14.242.0.2 (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 As I said before, you can't name a specific point in the guideline that justifies your reverts. It is not enough to refer to a guideline in general and you know that. You're obviously interpreting the rules as you see fit and that's not a good style. Bildersindtoll (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I explained above but it seems you don't understand so I recommend you go to the Tea House to get more specific help, so let's end the discussion here. Annh07 (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 I certainly don't have any questions. You can't just revert by referring to a guideline in general terms. You have to name the specific point within the guideline and you obviously can't do that. Bildersindtoll (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- The reason I reverted your edit is because it does not comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. If you have questions about policies, please post a question at the Tea House, not here. Annh07 (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 So you are not able to name a specific point within the guideline that justifies your reverts. Instead, you refer to the guideline in general. Not a good style and wrong. Bildersindtoll (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Since you don't understand MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and what I explained, I encourage you to go to the Tea House. If you continue to make edits based on your views, they will also be reverted by others because there is no consensus, for example here: [1], [2]. Annh07 (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 Rather than questioning the accuracy of my edits in principle, you should provide specific guideline points that justify your reverts. Bildersindtoll (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- In general, your edits goes against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I encourage you to post your question at the Tea House. Annh07 (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Annh07 I quoted from the guideline and it says that the icons can be used, for example, at the FIFA World Cup or the Olympics. The Icons should not be used in the info boxes in particular if too many flags would appear there and this could lead to confusion. This is not the case. So I still see no official reason why the icons should not be used. Bildersindtoll (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- It seems you don't understand, let's take an example: Template:Infobox international football competition or 2022 FIFA World Cup. Flag icons should only be inserted in infoboxes in those cases where they convey information in addition to the text, such as the country the team represents or the nationality of players. The country field (host country) already states the country name so a flag icon is unnecessary. Annh07 (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
How did you upload the Bumble logo?
editYou uploaded Bumble logo to WP Commons. What tool/mechanism did you use for the upload? UploadWizzard or something else? Drifting in Music (talk) 09:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:One Piece Anime Logo.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:One Piece Anime Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
edit Hi Bildersindtoll! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)