Your submission at Articles for creation: Alberto Rey (April 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ArtistofWNY! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alberto Rey has been accepted

edit
 
Alberto Rey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Amkgp 15:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Alberto Rey

edit

Hi @ArtistofWNY: I reviewed this article as part of WP:NPP. I noticed there is dozens of green links in the body of the article. The crappy software we use allows this, even thought they are illegal. This is an example. Orvis-endorsed in the lede. Please remove them all, as soon as possible, or the article will need to go back to Draft. scope_creepTalk 07:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Scope creep: Sorry about that! I will delete those as soon as possible! ArtistofWNY (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Scope creep: The external links in the text have now been deleted. Thanks for the insight!ArtistofWNY (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ArtistofWNY: You have missed a couple or three. Can you do them as well. Thanks. 16:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@ArtistofWNY: I think your were looking to cite properly. I will do for you. scope_creepTalk 16:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Scope creep: Hi, thanks for your help on removing those links and fixes those sources. Do you have any advice on how to improve the article to get the following notices removed? Do they have to be removed by another editor? This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (June 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Unbalanced scales.svg A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)"ArtistofWNY (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply