Arijit Kisku

Ways to improve Siromonipur

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Arijit Kisku, thanks for creating Siromonipur!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources; at the moment it is at risk of being tagged for deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Arijit Kisku. Thank you for your work on Dukhu Majhi. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!. you may expand it bit more. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you.

Arijit Kisku (talk) 23:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Uttar Bangla College moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Uttar Bangla College. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital rape and murder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital rape and murder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital rape and murder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ZimZalaBim ^talk 11:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from 2024 R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital rape and murder. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @ZimZalaBim, Arijit Kisku (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I fully understand and respect the policy that Wikipedia is not censored. However, in this particular case, my intention in removing the victim's name was to protect their identity in accordance with ethical journalism standards and the potential legal implications in many jurisdictions. Publicizing the name of a victim in a rape and murder case can cause further harm to the victim’s family and is generally discouraged by major news outlets and legal frameworks worldwide.

I believe it is important for Wikipedia to balance its commitment to providing comprehensive information with the need to protect individuals’ privacy, particularly in such sensitive cases. Perhaps we could discuss an approach that maintains the article's integrity without compromising the victim’s privacy.

I also read several existing articles about same topic where victim's name mentioned nowhere. Some articles are mentioned here 2007 De Anza College rape investigation, 2009 Richmond High School gang rape, Steubenville High School rape case & Glen Ridge rape.

Arijit Kisku (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

If you want to make a case for removing the victim's name, then do so on the article's talk page. Creating a pseudonym is not a viable solution, however. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you.

Arijit Kisku (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

R.G. Kar case

Hey, I mentioned the name of the victim because it was widely released in social media and few national media outlets. Even in 2012 Delhi Gang rape case the victim's name Jyoti Singh has been mentioned in the wikipedia article primarily because the family was pro-awareness regarding such crimes. Either way, as it has been mentioned in various articles and social media platforms, I have added the victim's name in the wikipedia article as wikipedia is primarily a knowledge-based platform, we cannot just ingore that piece of information which is aleady in circulation. Indian laws should be followed but here i am not seeing any objection to the use of the victim's name. What is your opinion?

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 17:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in One Nation, One Election, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 10:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uttar Bangla College has been accepted

Uttar Bangla College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Major Radhika Sen 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Major Radhika Sen 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 19:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Major Radhika Sen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Major Radhika Sen.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)