Akakakalal

Welcome!

Hi Akakakalal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! El_C 15:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Rewrite Anjana Chaudhari Page considering census of india 1921 volume 8 bombay presidency part 1 page 180-184 & census of india 1931 and topic anjana chaudhari......in fact chaudhari suffix first applied to anjanas only in 1931........plz read and rewrite this page please....... Akakakalal (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Misleading Edit Summaries

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari, you may be blocked from editing. At [[1]], you removed content on the cl. However, the sourced references does indeed support the previous statement, nor does it support the statement about "Kurmi" that you added. Hind ji (talk) 05:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Sir anjanas are basically kanabis not jats.....kunbi,kurmi,etc...used synomysioly in history and please check census of india 1911,1921,1931 for bombay presidency....you will find truth that anjanas are kanbi/kurmi(cultivators) as same as kadva kanabi and leva kanabi.....there are many books like kulmi kshatriya patidaron ka itihas(mangubhai patel);mahajati patidar(devendra patel),etc.....in which history of kadva,leva and anjanas mentioned....so please classify anjanas in kanbi/kurmi(cultivators) & not in jats......you can visit patidar page of wikipedia and can see also there.......... Akakakalal (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari, you may be blocked from editing. At [[2]], you removed content on the cl. However, the sourced references does indeed support the previous statement, nor does it support the statement about "Kurmi, Kunbi" that you added.This yr last Warning.No change this page. Hind ji (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anjana Chaudhari. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Please classify anjana chaudhari as cultivators as reality of ground Akakakalal (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Anjana Chaudhari) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You seemed to change referenced info, the wording of the internal link you changed did not match its destination, and you didn't include an edit summary to inform others of your edits. Please be mindful of this. Thanks. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 22:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)