AJWittenberg
Welcome!
Hello, AJWittenberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 00:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have to say I agree with your edit here as you say "(The previous text was unbalanced and created the impression to attempt to hide an agenda. I think the new text is fair and leaves it up to the reader to examine the references critically and make up their own mind based on the evidence.)" it serves no great purpose and as you say has "agenda" therefore = POV..... however I think the solution, rather than adding counterweight comments from another POV is simply to remove the OR content of the section to the talk page in case anyone can provide serious academic references to restore some of it. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 01:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Alternatively your approach may be right. I have tried to prune, but instead added a large POV and OR banner on page head :( In ictu oculi (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)