March 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blair has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blair was changed by 85.255.235.120 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924193 on 2017-03-05T16:14:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shuaib— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shuaib. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Kothlover (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Kothlover (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shuaib, you may be blocked from editing. Tillerh11 (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Miller v Jackson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LakesideMinersMy Talk Page 13:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at P.S.K. What Does It Mean?, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 22:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm MrBill3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anonymity have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. MrBill3 (talk) 09:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.255.235.120 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP belongs to Vodafone UK, and unfortunately it seems a network user has used Wikipedia in a disruptive manner. I’m requesting an unblock as I most certainly am not a disruptive user, and neither are thousands of others that use the network. 85.255.235.120 (talk) 22:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your IP is part of a range that has been blocked due to abuse of multiple accounts. As individual IPs cannot be unblocked from within a range, this appeal is declined. If you are not the target of the block, you can however request an account be made for you via WP:ACC as the block targets anonymous editors only Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ya'ammu Nubwoserre, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Lone-078 (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.