20spokesperson

November 2012

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Final Destination 3 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

So, after your weird remarks here, your first edits in four months and indicating you "must be unblocked" when you clearly were not blocked, I think you can see where that might look a little suspiscious. Upon looking further, it was clear that User:87Stone is another account you operate, and as you used it to edit some of the same articles as those you edited with this account, that is a clear violation of the policy on the use of multiple accounts, hence an indefinite block of that account and a timed block of this one.

However, that still leaves me wondering what those remarks at on that talk page were about since the other account I found was not blocked and, like this one, does not appear to have interacted witht the editor you were complaining about getting you blocked. So it seems there is at least one more out there. The best thing for you right now is to be honest, and let us know what other accounts you operate. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

20spokesperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It will not happen again and I read the rules and I will always use my personal account

Decline reason:

See where Beeblebrox said "The best thing for you right now is to be honest, and let us know what other accounts you operate"? As you have clearly been using undeclared sock accounts, this account has now been blocked indefinitely - but it can be unblocked if you make a new request identifying all other accounts you have used. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

20spokesperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will only use User:87Stone as my personal account. This one needs to be removed

Decline reason:

Technical decline, as this is not an unblock request for this account - see below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You need to go and request unblock over at that account and not here (and old accounts are never removed - they need to be kept for copyright attribution requirements). Also, as Beeblebrox pointed out above, it appears you had another account at the time you made that comment about being unblocked on Feb 18, as neither of the two we know about were blocked at the time. You will need to disclose *all* accounts you have used if you wish to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 20spokesperson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)