DYK for Prostitution of children

edit

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Whistleblower

edit


Tintin (character)

edit

Thanks for taking the time to provide your helpful expertise for this review; I have applied all of your suggestions. I hope you can return to give your support for FA. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have done what you asked and made a few more improvements. I respectfully hope you can return to give your support for FA. Many thanks! Prhartcom (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Asia Bibi

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Asia Bibi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ugog Nizdast -- Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Elsa (Disney)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elsa (Disney) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Elsa (Disney)

edit

The article Elsa (Disney) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Elsa (Disney) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 04:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
For making Elsa (Disney) a Good Article in such a short time! Kailash29792 (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Elsa (Disney)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Elsa (Disney) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed rename for Asia Bibi

edit

Greetings, you would be pleased to know that I've done the main part of the review Talk:Asia Bibi/GA1. What do you think about renaming the article from Asia Bibi to Asia Bibi blasphemy case and making the former a redirect? Similar to Madeline McCann and Rimsha Masih blasphemy case, it would be better since such a low profile individual can't have a complete biography without focusing on this event and clearly, the event itself is more notable (like in WP:PSEUDO). I look forward to your response and it won't affect the review much since article titles are beyond the scope. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Asia Bibi blasphemy case

edit

The article Asia Bibi blasphemy case you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Asia Bibi blasphemy case for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Freedom of speech Barnstar

edit
  The Freedom of speech Barnstar
On behalf of WikiProject Freedom of speech, The Freedom of speech Barnstar is awarded to 1ST7, for contributions related to expanding and improving the quality of articles on Wikipedia relevant to freedom of speech and censorship. From the participants at WikiProject Freedom of speech, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! --1ST7 (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

You're most welcome! :) Thanks very much for your contributions along the topics of freedom of speech and censorship on Wikipedia! — Cirt (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject Freedom of speech

edit

There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

  1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
  2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
  3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
  4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
  5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Elsa (Disney)

edit

  Hello! Some issues may need to be clarified with your submission of Elsa (Disney) at the Did You Know nominations page. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EagerToddler39 (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Elsa (Disney)

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:AsiaNoreen.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:AsiaNoreen.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —ШαмıQ @ 14:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Asia Bibi blasphemy case

edit

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please use edit summaries

edit

You really need to start using edit summaries, lest people like me come along and revert your unexplained edits that look disruptive, for example this. I refrained because you evidently worked hard to get this article to GA staus, but be advised that unexplained violations of WP:ENGVAR are not tolerated by many editors here. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the message; I'll try to start leaving summaries more frequently. As for that particular edit, up until around two days ago, the article was written entirely in American English (see here). I thought that switching it to British English was unnecessary (didn't realize there was a "use British English" template at the top of the page until a few hours ago) and switched it back. --1ST7 (talk) 03:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I recommend this...

edit

Hello 1ST7,

It's me Proudbolsahye, if you hadn't noticed already. How are you? I just wanted to tell you I stumbled upon this YouTube video about the Deportation of Armenian intellectuals on 24 April 1915...you know...the topic of the article we worked so hard on together :) Right when I saw this video, I thought that I should share it with you. Anyways, hope all is well. Keep on editing! Regards, Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Proudbolsahye! I've been doing great — how are you? Thanks for the link to the video; it was very interesting and very informative. I'm hoping to start editing regularly again soon, and will hopefully have time to do so within the next couple of weeks. Best regards, --1ST7 (talk) 04:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've been great. Hopefully, we can start working together soon once again. Let me know when you're ready! Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enemies Foreign concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enemies Foreign, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Enemies Foreign (NCIS episode) was accepted

edit
 
Enemies Foreign (NCIS episode), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anne Delong (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

1ST7,

I nominated Deportation of Armenian intellectuals on 24 April 1915 under my former username; Proudbolsahye. My usernname is now EtienneDolet.

You may remember voting for this nomination: [Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Deportation_of_Armenian_intellectuals_on_24_April_1915/archive1]

Just wanted to let you know. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dissent

edit

Saw this headline this morning and thought you, having written the article for The Whistleblower, would be interested: 'The Whistleblower' Director Larysa Kondracki Preps Follow-Up 'Dissent'. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link! --1ST7 (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, fellow FAC issue-haver

edit

You more than likely don't know who I am, but Erik directed me to you. An FAC for a film article I wrote, The FP, has two supports but no comments from anyone other than those two supporters. Looking at your FAC for The Whistleblower, I see that mine is very likely to stall as well. I was wondering if you would be willing to take some time and read through the article, leave some comments and vote on the nomination. Whether you do or don't, I would be happy to comment on The Whistleblower's FAC, should you choose to renominate it. Sidenote; I'd recommend it, as it'll likely pass so long as it gets enough response. Very well done article.

If you don't want to, don't have the time, or just don't like me, I'll understand all the same :P Have an excellent day! Corvoe (speak to me) 20:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'd be happy to help. I don't know if I'll be able to finish by tomorrow, but I'll have the comments and vote posted within the next few days. Any feedback on The Whistleblower (which I'm probably going to renominate really soon) would be greatly appreciated. You have a great day too! --1ST7 (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Corvoe:, just so you know, I've taken your suggestion and renominated The Whistleblower. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Whistleblower/archive2. --1ST7 (talk) 13:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Awesome! I'm at work right now, but I'll be able to look through it tonight. I'm sure there'll be a support vote from me before the day ends (Eastern Time, at least). Corvoe (speak to me) 15:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much for being willing to review it! --1ST7 (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Same to you! I'm going to make some preliminary comments now. Having some friends over until later tonight, then I'll finish out my review. Corvoe (speak to me) 21:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

Hello 1ST7, please take a look at Shaina NC and let me know. Thanks ! Abhi (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Abhi: Sorry for the late reply! I'm confused; I don't know what it is you're asking me to do. --1ST7 (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Complications at the FP's FAC

edit

Due to an extensive (and in my opinion, excellent) copy-edit by a GOCE member, I wanted to check in with everyone who voted on the FAC. I'm sure you're pretty focused on The Whistleblower at the moment, and I totally understand that you may not have time to do this. If you can find the time, though, would you be willing to look through the article again and either confirm your vote or withdraw it with comment? If not, that's perfectly okay. Thank you again for your comments and support! Best of luck on The Whistleblower, it's looking like it'll pass. Corvoe (speak to me) 15:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Corvoe: So sorry for the delay; I haven't had Internet access. Will look over the article again tomorrow. --1ST7 (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
No sweat! Thank you for looking it over again for me, and for all your help thus far. Corvoe (speak to me) 01:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Whistleblower nationality

edit

Hello! I thought I'd let you know I made a change to the nationality of the film, as AFI lists it as a co-production of Canada, Germany, and the United States. If there are other sources in the article that I missed that refute this, feel free to revert me. Good luck on your FAC! I see your images got screened, so that's a good sign! Corvoe (speak to me) 11:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for catching that! --1ST7 (talk) 02:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Congrats on The Whistleblower!

edit

I saw it got passed on Wednesday. Congratulations! You did some fantastic work on that article. Corvoe (be heard) 02:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! And thanks for reviewing it! --1ST7 (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Double congrats! I just saw it on the front page. We both had articles on the front page with a week of each other, that's too cool! Great work! Sock (tock talk) 02:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Congrats to you as well! --1ST7 (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not My Life

edit

Hi 1ST7,

I would like to add my congratulations on your success in getting The Whistleblower promoted to featured status. I'm looking forward to seeing it go up on the main page soon. I recently submitted Not My Life, another article about a human-trafficking-related film, for featured status. I greatly appreciated your taking on the good article review for that article and I was wondering if you might be willing to review the article again for its featured article candidacy. I would be grateful for any constructive comments you might provide there. Thanks for improving Wikipedia's coverage of human trafficking.

Neelix (talk) 17:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the congratulations.   I'd be happy to review Not My Life for featured status, and will start on it tomorrow. --1ST7 (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your contributions to the Not My Life FAC. The article is now featured, and I have requested that it be granted a main page slot. Any input you would be willing to provide at the corresponding discussion would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Precious

edit

the mountains echoed
Thank you for quality articles related to works of literature such as The Whistleblower, And the Mountains Echoed and Stolen Innocence, for reviewing GAs, tagging and supporting freedom of speech, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for the award and for your kind words. They were such a pleasant surprise.  . --1ST7 (talk) 23:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were the 963rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Five years ago, you were recipient no. 963 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

She Has a Name

edit

Hi 1ST7,

Thank you again for your contributions to the Not My Life FAC. I recently initiated an FAC for another human-trafficking-related article, and I thought that you might be willing to participate in the discussion. The article is called She Has a Name and you can find the FAC here. Any constructive comments you are able to provide would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tony and Ziva in Berlin.png

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Tony and Ziva in Berlin.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:PenelopeGarcia.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:PenelopeGarcia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Call (film).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The Call (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured article FAQ

edit

I've created this which you might be interested. If you have any additional questions/answers to add, please feel free to do so. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Palak Muchhal, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Elsa's ice palace.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Elsa's ice palace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ziva's rescue.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ziva's rescue.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply