148.252.129.216

January 2017

Hello, I'm John "Hannibal" Smith. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alan Smith (footballer, born 1980), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 21:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Alan Smith (footballer, born 1980). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 21:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Georgia (U.S. state), you may be blocked from editing. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 21:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Georgia (U.S. state). Drewmutt (talk) 21:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

[stwalkerster|talk] 21:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blade Runner 2049 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blade Runner 2049 was changed by 148.252.129.216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897401 on 2017-10-05T16:22:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 17:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:DC5C:5876:C4E0:DC2C. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James McCue have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:DC5C:5876:C4E0:DC2C (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Your recent editing history at Lauterbrunnen–Mürren Mountain Railway shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
For your ongoing violation of the 3 revert rule per this IP or User talk:109.26.169.68. ZH8000 (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:148.252.129.216 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: ). Thank you. ZH8000 (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Britain. Your deliberately deceptive edit summary is also unacceptable. David Biddulph (talk) 23:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Totally Spies!. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Electromagnet, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

---