If there exists a c such that for all n, then converges
If for all n, and diverges, then diverges.
The proposed extension is written:
where εn is a sequence of real numbers such that .
I think it can be shown that:
If there exists a c such that for all n, then there exists a c such that for all n and so converges.
If for all n, and diverges, then for all n and so diverges.
The problem remains to either show that when and diverges, diverges, or to find further restrictions on εn such that it does diverge, so that the convergence properties specified by are the same as specified by .
The above equation for can be solved for an:
where Qn is the product:
and Q1=1. We may take an and Dn to be unity, without loss of generality. So now we wish to find when
diverges. (Note that when εn = 0, the product Qn = 1, and we recover the simple Kummer's test, and so diverges since diverges).
Abel's test applied to the above sequences states that if:
converges
is monotone and bounded
then
coverges. In the present case, is NOT bounded since εnDn -> 0, but I think Abel's theorem can be modified to prove that if
converges
is unbounded
then
diverges.
So now we just need to deal with the first assumption ( converges). It can be easily seen that
so we want to look at the convergence of which equals Q-1 where Q is defined as:
SO THE CONDITION THAT Q EXISTS is the restriction the εn must obey in order that diverge for the case when .
According to Knopp[1] (page 224, Theorem 9), if converges, Qn will converge to Q. Also according to Knopp (page 225 supplementary theorem), if converges, Qn will converge to Q.
So these are two restrictions on εn that will assure divergence of : εnDn must converge to zero, and one or both of the above two conditions on εn apply. (Note these two conditions are sufficient, but not necessary: if they don't apply, that doesn't mean Q does not exist)
Using the extensions to prove extensions to Raabe's and Bertrand's tests and Gauss's test