User:OrenBochman/Adoption/Wikiquette prt2

This is an assignment for Oren's adoption program. You are welcome to edit this page if you notice any errors or have any additional information to add, but as a courtesy, please notify Oren if you make any major changes to avoid any possible confusion between him and his adoptee(s). Thanks!

Wikiquette 202

Conduct policies
Civility	Consensus	Edit warring	Editing policy	No personal attacks	Ownership of articles

Civility

"Civility is to human nature what warmth is to wax."

—Arthur Schopenhauer

Here are some more pointers on civility and better communication:

Explain yourself. Not sufficiently explaining edits can be perceived as uncivil, whether that's the editor's intention or not. Use good edit summaries, and use the talk page if the edit summary doesn't provide enough space or if a more substantive debate is likely to be needed.
Someone may very well be an idiot. But telling them so is neither going to increase their intelligence nor improve your ability to communicate with them.
No matter how frustrated you are, do not tell people to "grow up" or include any wording along the lines of "if this were kindergarten" in your messages.
Be careful with edit summaries. Edit summaries are relatively short comments, and thus potentially subject to misinterpretation or oversimplification. They cannot be changed after pressing "Save", and are often written in haste, particularly in stressful situations. Remember to explain your edit, especially when things are getting heated; to avoid personal comments about any editors you have disputes with; and to use the talk page to further explain your view of the situation.

Edit summaries

Efficent use of edit summaries is considered one of the hallmarks of a good wikipedian. Aspirants applying for promotion to administration are expected to approach 100% (i.e. 95% or higher) of using edit summaries per edit. An empty edit summary will often be interpreted as a flag of possible vandalism by spam fighting robots. Since you do not want to increase the work of spam fighters - and certainly don't wish them to revert your work - be a good communicator.

When you make a copy-edit, leave a note in the Edit summary field detailing your changes.
Summary notes for copy edits should be concise but should to mention whether the edit is a correction or an enhancement.
- Spelling and grammar corrections generally count as minor edits, which you can denote by checking the box labeled "This is a minor edit";
- Stylistic corrections are generally major and call for written summaries.
It is essential to keep edit summaries civil.
- It is not helpful, nor necessary to comment on the previous editor's language skills. (Most wikipedians are not native english speakers).
- If you are doing a follow-up copy-edit, it is usually best to stay silent about previous copy edits; instead, you may want to refer to your work as follow-up edits or additional improvements.
When working with pages of new editors - e.g. at articles for creation - using long form of edit summaries or better yet comment on the talk page.

Some examples of acceptable edit summaries:

Copy edit: Fact-checked names of ships
Copy edit: Reworded introductory paragraph for clarity
Copy edit: Reworked history section for encyclopedic style

however most editors abbreviate edit summaries:

Edit summaries are the only record many wikipedians will see of your work. Particularly those who are carrying maintenance task using semi-automated tools. Due to their concise nature, edit summaries are often a prefered means of quick communicating between experienced editor.

Making Better Edit Summaries

Full Term	Abbreviations	Description
add	+, add, addition	Addition of something
alphabetization	alpha, abc	Alphabetization of a list
capitalization	cap, capital, cpt, lc, lcase, uc, ucase	Fixing of capitalization
category	+cat, -cat, cat, recat, re-cat	Addition, subtraction or fixing of a category
cleanup	cl, clean, tidy	Many different kinds of small changes in a single edit.
comment	cm, cmt, re	Addition of comment or reply
copyedit	cpyed, ced, c/e, ce	Copy edit
creation	creation, new	Creation of a new article
disambiguation	disambig, disamb, disam, dab, byp disambig	Addition of disambiguation or removal of ambiguity
duplication	dup, dupe	Removal of duplication
external link	EL, xl, ext lk, ext lks, ext lnk, ext lnks, ext link, ext links, URL, http	Addition of external links
formatting	fm, fmt, frmt, MoS, mos, MOS	Formatting, per Manual of Style
short new text (full text)	ft	Addition of short new text, which is fully given in this edit summary
grammar	gr, gm, grmr	Fixing grammar
headers	head, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6	Fixing header markup or changing header wording
interwiki	iwk, iw	Addition of interwiki links (between Wikimedia projects)
links	lk, lks, lnk, ln, wikilink, wl	Addition of internal (Wikipedia) links
merge	mrg, mrgd, merged in	Article merge
miscellaneous	misc	Use only when a more specific and more useful edit summary is not practical.
move	mv, mov	Article move
null edit	null, nx, ø	Saving the page without changing anything, see Null edit.
punctuation	punc, punct, pct	Fixing punctuation
redirect	rd, rdr, redir	Article redirect. Specify what article it redirects to.
redirect fix	snap dbl rdr, fix redir	"Snapping" a double redirect: turning a double redirect into a single redirect.
references	ref, refs	Adding or fixing source citation.
remove/delete	-, rm, rmv, del	Removal of something
revert	rv, rvt, rvrt	Revert to a previous edit
talk	see talk	Explanation of edit on the article's Talk page
spelling	sp, typo, typos	Fixing of typos or incorrect spelling.
wikify	wfy, wky, wkfy	Formatting using wiki markup (as opposed to plain text or HTML) and add internal links to material, incorporating it into the whole of Wikipedia

Edit summary best practices

Remember you can't go back and change your edit summaries.

Do:
- Be clear about what you did, so that other editors can assess it quickly.
- Use neutral language.
- Be calm.
Don't:
- Make snide comments.
- Make personal remarks about editors.
- Be aggressive.