WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality and WP:INCIVILity:
Context: All of this took place in a very long running multi-threaded discussion about some inaccurate information that User:Tenmei became a fanatic defender of. The inaccurate information in question was well-discussed and presumed settle prior to this. Details of this dispute are addressed in other parts of this RFC.
Points of Interest:
- [1] - A separate topic (unrelated to context). When one of his article sections were challenged for irrelevance, he arrogantly claimed his opponents "didn't get it" but he refused to provide a concrete objection.
- [2] - Considers criticisms of his extremely cumbersome style of communication a diversionary tactic. Also asked opponent to "put up or shut up".
- [3] - When asked to help remove the inaccurate information, he made accusations of WP:POKE and made suggestive implications of "consequences".
- [4] - Implied an opponent concerns about the inaccurate information to be bad faith but managed to fool another editor into giving support.
- [5] - Told an opponent to "put up or shut up". Requested the said opinion to answer a question that was address many times prior.
- [6] - Claimed his opponents were fighting an impossible defend position. Tried to make the assertions that as long as he followed WP:RS and WP:V, other editors' could not contest his claims with mere opinions.
- [7] - Refused to enter WP:Mediation
- [8] - Started to call his opponents' arguments to be "factoids"
- [9] - Endorsed the some very rude accusations made by another editor (User:Phoenix7777) towards an opponent. In this accusation, User:Phoenix7777 said the opponent must be lying due to non-response towards an issue (that was actually over-addressed) and that the said opponent is a "loser of the discussion" and did not deserve tolerance.
- [10] - Made lies about an opponent's claims. All three "assertions" were never made at any point
- [11] - Started to call an opponent's ideas to be discredited gambits. Accused another opponent of "trivializing" and "exhausting" the rest.
- [12] - Considers a reference to Gibraltar territorial dispute to be WP:BAIT or WP:POKE because one of his friends is British.
- User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre#Baiting - Complained to an admin about the Gibraltar example being a WP:BAIT after being told to stop complaining.
- [13] - Randomly spamming complaints.
- [14] - Considered the whole dispute a "con game" masterminded by an opponent with another opponent being a shill. Considered the "shill" editor no longer being able to distinguish facts from factoids and fantansy from reality. Considered the "shill" editor to be "seduced by fraud".
- [15] - Again called an opponent a shill and accused him of losing objectivity.
- [16] - Told another editor that a recent locking of the relevant article is masterminded by an opponent and that this opponent is cunning enough to turn opinions against him.