User:B.raven222/Drag king/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

note: it is difficult to find articles that focus on drag kings that are from a reliable source; the few peer reviewed articles about drag usually ignore drag kings or only mention a few underdeveloped claims about them - Surkan, Kim 2008. Drag Kings In the New Wave
-This is a peer reviewed article by a Phd candidate so it is reliable. This source covers the gender fluidity of drag, specifically of drag kings.^[1]
-Basiliere, Jae 2019. Staging Dissents:Drag Kings, Resistance, and Feminist Masculinities
-This is also a peer reviewed article. This offers a feminist perspective of drag kings, and sheds light on why drag kings are often overshadowed by drag queens in the LGBTQ+ community.^[2]

Examples:

Luke, Learie. 2007. Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980 Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
- This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa.
- This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Baker, William J.; Dransfield, John (2016). "Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
- This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source for a specific fact. Since it only dedicates a few sentences to the topic, it can't be used to establish notability.

References

^ Surkan, Kim (2003-04-01). "Drag Kings in the New Wave: Gender Performance and Participation". Journal of Homosexuality. 43 (3–4): 161–186. doi:10.1300/J082v43n03_10. ISSN 0091-8369.
^ Basiliere, Jae (2019-06). "Staging Dissents: Drag Kings, Resistance, and Feminist Masculinities". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 44 (4): 979–1001. doi:10.1086/702034. ISSN 0097-9740. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Outline of proposed changes

Click on the edit button to draft your outline.

The first and most obvious change that must be made is to alter the introduction paragraph with more inclusive language. Right now, the article makes it seem like drag kings can only be women who dress up as famous men, whereas drag kings are people of all genders who create personas that may be solely based on male stereotypes, but often incorporate female aspects as well. The world of drag simply isn't as black and white as this wWkipedia page makes it sound. I also plan on monitoring the language throughout for this very reason.

On my initial read of this article, I already noticed a few spelling/grammar errors, so I will be fixing those. For example, the word "marginalized" is misspelled twice.

Someone in the talk section suggested that there be more pictures, so I plan on adding one of a drag king performer from 2019 in order to include a more modern picture. I found this photo through Wikipedia so it is safe to use.

Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.

In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality.

Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further.

Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap.

Get Help

[1] Surkan, Kim (2003-04-01). "Drag Kings in the New Wave: Gender Performance and Participation". Journal of Homosexuality. 43 (3–4): 161–186. doi:10.1300/J082v43n03_10. ISSN 0091-8369.

[2] Basiliere, Jae (2019-06). "Staging Dissents: Drag Kings, Resistance, and Feminist Masculinities". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 44 (4): 979–1001. doi:10.1086/702034. ISSN 0097-9740. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[1]

[2]