United States v. Hooe, 5 U.S. (Cranch 1) 318 (1803), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. It was a case that hinged mainly on procedural issues relating to the documents that must accompany an appeal from courts within the District of Columbia.[1]
| United States v. Hooe | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Full case name | The United States of America v. T.R. Hooe & Others |
| Citations | 5 U.S. 318 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Subsequent | 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 73 (1805) |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
| Laws applied | |
| District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 | |
Background of the case
editThe Supreme Court had already ruled in Jennings v. The Perseverance, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 336 (1797) that the writs of error must be accompanied by a factual record.[2] The act of Congress 27 February 1801, creating the District of Columbia held that, writs should be prosecuted in the same manner as had been the case of writs of error on judgments or appeals upon orders or decrees rendered in the circuit court of the United States.[1]
The decision
editThe court held that the act of congress and the prior precedent, when taken together meant that all appeals from the District of Columbia must be accompanied by a statement of facts.
See also
editNotes and references
editExternal links
edit- Text of United States v. Hooe, 5 U.S. (Cranch 1) 318 (1803) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |