Uncial 095

(Redirected from Uncial 0123)

Uncial 095 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), α 1002 (Soden),[1] is a Greek uncial manuscript of the New Testament, dated paleographically to the 8th-century.[2]

Uncial 095
New Testament manuscript
TextActs of the Apostles 2-3†
Date8th-century
ScriptGreek
Now atNational Library of Russia
Size28 cm by 19 cm
TypeAlexandrian/mixed
CategoryIII

Description

edit

The codex contains a small part of the Acts of the Apostles 2:45-3:8, on one parchment leaf (28 cm by 19 cm). The text is written in one column per page, 21 lines per page, in large uncial letters.[2]

The manuscript was part of the same codex to which Uncial 0123 belonged. It contains texts of Acts 2:22, 26-28, 45-3:2. 0123 was examined by de Muralt and cited by Tischendorf. Formerly it was classified as lectionary Apostolarion. It was labelled as 72a by Scrivener, as 70a by Gregory.[3]

The Greek text of this codex is mixed. Aland placed it in Category III.[2]

Present location

edit

Currently it is dated by the INTF to the 8th-century.[2][4]

Constantin von Tischendorf brought it from Sinai.

The codex 095 is located now in the National Library of Russia (Gr. 17). The codex 0123 has a catalogue number Gr. 49, 1-2, frag. in the same library in Saint Petersburg.[2]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Gregory, Caspar René (1908). Die griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testament. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung. p. 40.
  2. ^ a b c d e Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-0-8028-4098-1.
  3. ^ Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hinrichs. p. 468.
  4. ^ "Liste Handschriften". Münster: Institute for New Testament Textual Research. Retrieved 21 April 2011.

Further reading

edit
edit
  • Uncial 095: at the Encyclopedia of Textual Criticism