Template talk:This is a redirect
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Template-protected edit request on 19 August 2023
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Template:Redirect category shell Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Template talk:Redirect category shell Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
 | Template:This is a redirect is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 15 November 2009. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
| This template was considered for deletion on 8 April 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
broken substitution
editthis can't be right ... Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Frietjes, that particular issue was fixed, and while I thought I had found the erroneous edits apparently I was wrong. Also, this template is no longer being autosubst. If you have a good way of finding these erroneous substitutions I'm all ears, because I've searched three times now and have fixed everything I've discovered. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Primefac, should be possible with a regexp match + tracking in the redirect category shell. but, that would add some processing overhead. the other option would be to go through the bot's edit history during the time period when this was happening and check all of those pages. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Remaining transclusions
edit@Primefac and Rich Farmbrough: All remaining transclusions of this template are on fully protected pages. —Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, by my reckoning there should be 99 of them. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC).
- Plus 4 not in the Category:Protected redirects, making 103. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC).
- Plus 4 not in the Category:Protected redirects, making 103. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC).
Template-protected edit request on 25 August 2022
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace the following: {{Wikidata redirect}} with: {{Wikidata redirect|Q14450647}} @CLYDEFRANKLIN 17:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- To editor CLYDEFRANKLIN: fixed by tying the {{This is a redirect}} template to its Wikidata item. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 18:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 19 August 2023
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Edit request: change {{Wikidata redirect}} to {{R with Wikidata item}}.
Unless I’m misunderstanding, {{Wikidata redirect}} is intended for soft redirects, and the equivalent for hard redirects is {{R with Wikidata item}}. A smart kitten (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
