Template talk:2016 AFC standings
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 130.108.196.138 in topic Help keeping the standing template correct
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2016 AFC standings template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Format
editsov is tiebreaker first over sos. can it be listed first?
- SOS is first on ESPN website. Just staying with what's already done. Jdavi333 (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
ESPN isn't correct though. Some of the tiebreakers are wrong too :(
Browns' record
editIf the Browns lose to the Ravens next Thursday, they would drop to 0-10. If this happened, would Cleveland be mathematically eliminated from playoff contention? - Joshua Haralson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.198.69 (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- With a loss, a steelers win, and a bengals win the are eliminated from the division. Adding wins by both Dener and KC, they will be eliminated from both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:130D:8005:1141:4A1E:539:E083 (talk) 16:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- See the season talk page for a full discussion of the elimination scenarios for every week.Jdavi333 (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Help keeping the standing template correct
editCan somebody please fix the AFC conference standings template? I messed it up. - Joshua Haralson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.196.138 (talk) 01:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)