Template:Did you know nominations/Who's That Chick?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 19:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Who's That Chick?

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that when "Who's That Chick?" debuted at number nine on the UK Singles Chart, Rihanna became only the fourth act in UK chart history to have at least three songs in the top ten of the UK Singles Chart?

• Reviewed: Schoolin' Life

Created/expanded by Calvin999 (talk). Self nom at 13:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

• Tip: the hook is too long. I suggest you remove "whilst Rihanna's previous singles "Only Girl (In the World)" and "What's My Name" were already in the top-ten". What a pro. (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

• Removed. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 09:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

• Before I can do a full review, the article needs expansion. This revision was 2576 characters long, meaning the article needs to be at least 12880 characters in length. However, the current version is only 11278. This means you need 1602 characters more. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• Okay. I will try an expand it more. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 15:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• How much am I off now? Aaron • ^{You Da One} 15:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• 800, give or take. You are at 12031 characters Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• Okay let me get my thinking cap on haha. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 22:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

• How about now?! I don't think I can get much more out of it. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 16:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

• K, It's long enough. I'll get on the review. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

• Hook: Interesting, short enough, cited.

Article: New enough, long enough. Referencing is good, formatted. Paraphrasing check (duplication detector report) looks fine.

Good to go! Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)