Template:Did you know nominations/Upper Twin Falls Bridge

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Upper Twin Falls Bridge

(

)

... that the Upper Twin Falls Bridge was built to replace a previous span that would have been flooded upon completion of a dam downstream?

ALT1:... that the Upper Twin Falls Bridge is the only NRHP site in both Michigan and Wisconsin?
Reviewed: Texas antelope squirrel

Moved to mainspace by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 03:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

All sources are reliable, and information is adequate and well-written. ~~ALT1 is my preference.~~ I've made edits, but I hope this shall not affect this review. --George Ho (talk) 05:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: striking ALT1, as the article and its sources do not support it. This is the first site nominated by both states, but this doesn't mean that there might not be other NRHP sites—such as other bridges—that were nominated by only one of the states yet exist in both. I also think having NRHP as an acronym detracts from the hookiness, but that's irrelevant given its more fundamental problem. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Original hook might be interesting and well-sourced, but there should be better alternatives. If not, then I hope that it is good enough to go... --George Ho (talk) 03:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)