- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Twin Bing
edit- ... that the Twin Bing has been described as "two brown lumps, about the size of golf balls, roughly textured, and stuck to one another like Siamese twins"?
- Reviewed: Gordian Fulde
5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC).
OK, it's new enough, the image is properly licensed, the hook is verified, and the article is almost/maybe long enough: the 5x is narrowly passed here. BUT, there's a slight catch: SL93, plz look at my edit summaries: I just don't see what those last two sentences are doing in this article, and the very word choice ("Due to the FDA") is a bit odd--accusatory in some libertarian way, or at least that's how I read it. I think, if you'll allow me a suggestion, that it would be more productive to list the actual ingredients and nutritional value; that should get you enough to pass the 5x test even if you scrap the current last two sentences (which I would scrap). Drmies (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
