Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lebel (ice hockey)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Robert Lebel (ice hockey)

edit

5x expanded by Flibirigit (talk). Self-nominated at 15:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC).

  • New enough, good length, well-cited, neutral. I prefer ALT0 for the hook—the only real issue is that the sentence beginning "Lebel also defended an IIHF decision excluding ..." doesn't make sense to me. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
  • During the 1960s, Canada and the IIHF had substantial disagreements over who was classified as an amateur player, versus a professional player. Canada often used former professional players in these events who no longer had a professional contract, and where reinstated as amateurs. The sentence context talks about Lebel going against popular beliefs in Canada regarding the timeline of reinstating amateurism, that is by September 1st, the typical start of a hockey season. In other words, players who didn't make it past professional tryouts in August, would become amateurs again. The context is part of the larger reason why Canada withdrew from IIHF competition in 1970, and the basis for the 1972 Summit Series. Does that help? Flibirigit (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
  • That works for me—I imagine the exact date is not particularly important, then, which may make the sentence easier to read. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 17:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)