- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 03:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Oran fatwa
edit- ... that shortly after the forced conversions of Muslims in Castile, a fatwa was issued which allowed outward practice of Christianity while secretly keeping the Islamic faith ....?
- Reviewed: According to WP:WIADYK, if I have less than five DYK credits, I am exempt from the QPQ requirement.
Created by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC).
Review
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- n - Interesting:
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed: - na
- Used in article: - na
- Clear at 100px: - na
QPQ: 
- not required as this is the author's third DYK (Rebellion of the Alpujarras (1499–1501) and Ahmad ibn Abi Jum'ah)
Overall: 
The hook corresponds to a statement in the lead which doesn't have a direct citation. Also note that there's a quotation "key theological document" which doesn't appear in the citation provided (Stewart). The quotation actually seems to come from Harvey p60. Quotations should have specific citations per WP:V and so this requires attention. Generally, this seems to be good scholarly work, so thanks for the submission. Andrew D. (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I added an inline citation (with direct quoted text inside the <ref> tag) for the passage in the lead corresponding to the fact mentioned in the hook. "Key theological document" also appears in Stewart p. 266, in lines 2-4 of he page. But it seems Stewart actually Harvey p60 here, so I added both as inline citation for this passage. In general I also added several more inline citation throughout the article. Let me know if these changes are sufficient and if there is anything else for me to address! HaEr48 (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Review 2
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed: - na
- Used in article: - na
- Clear at 100px: - na
QPQ: - not required as this is the author's third DYK (Rebellion of the Alpujarras (1499–1501) and Ahmad ibn Abi Jum'ah)
There's a citation for the hook now and so it's good to go. Andrew D. (talk) 09:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)