Template:Did you know nominations/Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut, BWV 199
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut, BWV 199
edit... Bach's early cantata Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut, BWV 199, on a text by Georg Christian Lehms (pictured) was the first church solo cantata Bach showed to his Leipzig audience?
- Reviewed: Diptych by Giovanni da Rimini
Improved to Good Article status by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 20:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC).
- I'd quite like to save this for Halloween as part of a Halloween-themed set, with a new hook (see below). Would you be OK with this? I'll see if I can find an appropriate heart-themed photo to go with it. Prioryman (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that an audience in Leipzig was the first to hear Bach's My heart swims in blood?
- Tempting idea, but as far as I understand we have to be factually correct. We don't know about the first audience. We know that a Weimar audience heard it (possibly in 1715 but not sure, could be 1716, could have been the first but we don't know), only then a Leipzig audience (1723). Please rephrase as ALT2, perhaps using also "a monster [in God's eyes]". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK, how about the following then, with the image on the right? Prioryman (talk) 06:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
ALT2 ... that Bach's My heart swims in blood (heart pictured) is about the redemption of a "monster"?- I think better no image ;) - unless you have one of a swimming heart. Leave room for imagination. Do we have to mantion Bach?
- ALT3: ... that a "monster" confessed dramatically: "My heart swims in blood"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Much better than my suggestion! Nice one. Now let's review the article: it was granted GA status on the nomination date, so no problem there. Clearly long enough and within policy, with a good assortment of reliable sources. ALT3 is interesting and sourced, and a QPQ review has been done. This should be fine to run now. Prioryman (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
