- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Manchurian plague
Plague workers wearing personal protective equipment
Created by Caorongjin (talk) and Bangalamania (talk). Nominated by Caorongjin (talk) at 08:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
I would suggest removing the extra links in your hook so only " Manchurian plague" is linked. You want people to click on your article and not any of the others. Image is OK after a crop. buidhe 19:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks! I have removed most of the extra links. Caorongjin (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this. As we've run quite a few "cloth face masks" hooks lately, I'm wondering what you think of this alt:- ALT1:
... that the origins of the modern hazmat suit can be traced to the first use of personal protective equipment (plague workers pictured) during the Manchurian plague of 1910–1911? Yoninah (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Yoninah: That makes sense. Although, I wonder if it would be better to foreground the plague (and use fewer wikilinks). Not sure which is found to render more clicks! So:
- ALT2:
... that the Manchurian plague of 1910–1911 set a precedence for widespread use of personal protective equipment such as the modern hazmat suit (plague workers pictured)? --Caorongjin (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I'm trying to catch readers' attention with the well-known hazmat suit and leading them to the Manchurian plague. Your wording
set a precedence
(should be "precedent") is also a little wordy. My hook doesn't need so many links:
- ALT1a:
... that the origins of the modern hazmat suit can be traced to the first use of personal protective equipment during the Manchurian plague of 1910–1911 (plague workers pictured)? Yoninah (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Thanks for that. That's fine. Though, I would be cautious not to name it the first use of PPE, given that it can be understood in a generic sense. Also, would not PPE be sufficient as opposed to "personal protective equipment"? Perhaps:
-
That's fine, though we should link PPE. @Buidhe: could you take a look at ALT1b please? Yoninah (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1b per previous review. Thanks for the suggestion, Yoninah! buidhe 19:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
I would suggest removing the extra links in your hook so only " Manchurian plague" is linked. You want people to click on your article and not any of the others. Image is OK after a crop. buidhe 19:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
